Shifting attention between global features and small details: an event-related potential study

In two experiments, large letters H or Z composed of small letters (also H or Z) were presented. Subjects had to make a two-choice motor response (e.g. H--left key, Z--right key). A cue presented 500 ms before the letter indicated which level (global or local) was relevant. In Experiment I, a third letter (T) sometimes appeared either at the cued or the non-cued level; in the former case, subjects had to shift their attention and to respond to stimulus features located at the non-cued level. The interference effect (RT delay in response to incongruent stimuli as compared to congruent ones) was larger when the local, rather than global, level was cued. A slow anterior negativity preceding globally-cued stimuli and shorter N1 and P2 ERP component latencies to these stimuli indicated better preparation for processing of global, as compared to local, stimulus features. The shift from local to global focus yielded a larger increase of RT, error rate, and of the P600 latency than the global-to-local shift. The P600 latency changes were parallel to those of RT. In Experiment II, the attentional shift was provoked by stimulus color red-colored letters meant that the cue was invalid, and thus, subjects had to respond to the non-cued level. Neither the interference nor the attentional shift demonstrated any asymmetry between the global and local levels. ERPs also did not differ substantially after local and global cues. In the condition demanding a shift of focus (invalid cue, incongruent letter), a positive deflection of the lateralized readiness potential indicated the activation of the wrong response channel. The large RT increment in this condition was not accompanied by an increase of the P600 latency. Two possible mechanisms of attentional shift may be proposed, the first related to perceptual processes (e.g. an additional visual search), and the second, to the competition between two response intentions.

[1]  Does the attentional state determine processing dominance in to-be-ignored compound stimuli? , 1994, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the phonological processing of words and non-words , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  M. Wertheimer Drei Abhandlungen zur Gestalttheorie , 1925 .

[4]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[5]  L M Ward,et al.  Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  L. Robertson,et al.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  E Donchin,et al.  Second Thoughts : Multiple P 3 OOs Elicited by a Single Stimulus , 2005 .

[8]  M. Coles Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[9]  M. Rugg The effects of handedness on event-related potentials in a rhyme-matching task , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  T. Stoffer,et al.  The time course of attentional zooming: A comparison of voluntary and involuntary allocation of attention to the levels of compound stimuli , 1993, Psychological research.

[11]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Ruchkin,et al.  Event-related potentials during arithmetic and mental rotation. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  K. Brookhuis,et al.  Late positive components and stimulus evaluation time , 1981, Biological Psychology.

[14]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Event-related potentials and the matching of familiar and unfamiliar faces , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  E. Donchin,et al.  On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[16]  L. Paquet Global and local processing in nonattended objects: a failure to induce local processing dominance. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  H. J. Eysenck,et al.  Advances in psychophysiology: J.R. Jennings, P.K. Ackles & M.G.H. Coles (Eds) Vol.5 (1993).320 pp. £42.50 (hardback). ISBN 185302 191 1 , 1994 .

[18]  M. Falkenstein,et al.  Late visual and auditory ERP components and choice reaction time , 1993, Biological Psychology.

[19]  H. Heinze,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical stimulus processing: Dissociation between onset and later stages of global and local target processing , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  C. Brunia,et al.  Waiting in readiness: gating in attention and motor preparation. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels , 1975, Vision Research.

[22]  Maryanne Martin Local and global processing: The role of sparsity , 1979 .

[23]  L C Robertson,et al.  The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  S J Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  J. R. Pomerantz Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Walter Ritter,et al.  The N2 component elicited by stimulus matches and multiple targets , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[28]  V. Johnston,et al.  Multiple P3s to emotional stimuli and their theoretical significance. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[29]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  R. Verleger On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Jeff Miller Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[32]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Gergely Csibra,et al.  Effects of stimulus alternation, repetition and response requirements on event-related potentials to patterned visual stimuli , 1994, Biological Psychology.

[34]  T. Stoffer Attentional zooming and the global-dominance phenomenon: Effects of level-specific cueing and abrupt visual onset , 1994, Psychological research.

[35]  J Wandmacher,et al.  Superiority of global features in classification and matching , 1985, Psychological research.

[36]  John A. Baro,et al.  The effects of uniform field flicker and blurring on the global precedence effect , 1991 .

[37]  F. George ACUITY AND THE STATISTICAL THEORY OF FIGURAL AFTEREFFECTS , 1962 .

[38]  K. Richard Ridderinkhof,et al.  When global information and local information collide: a brain potential analysis of the locus of interference effects , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[39]  D. LaBerge,et al.  PRESENTATION PROBABILITY AND CHOICE TIME. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  D. Navon,et al.  Testing a queue hypothesis for the processing of global and local information. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  R. Kimchi Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Modern mental chronometry , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[43]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[44]  David Navon,et al.  The forest revisited: More on global precedence , 1981 .

[45]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials in phonological matching tasks , 1984, Brain and Language.