On the Causes of IQ Differences between Groups and Implications for Social Policy

This paper presents an analysis, supported by recently published data, which suggests that IQ differences between groups may be explained by environmental factors. Jensen's hypothesis that such differences may be primarily genetic is critically examined and rejected on the basis of his misinterpretation of the meaning of the concept of heritability, the difficulties with the heritability formula, and several studies which indicate that when environmental factors are controlled the correlation between IQ and race vanishes. An alternative approach to the analysis of IQ differences between groups is then presented which emphasizes differential diffusion of the cognitive components measured in IQ tests, and differential nutritional advantages. In conclusion, the implications of this approach for social policy are discussed and suggestions are made concerning the need for a greater emphasis on the analysis of American social and national needs in the training of anthropologists.

[1]  Eaves Lj.  Computer simulation of sample size and experimental design in human psychogenetics. , 1972 .

[2]  S Scarr-Salapatek,et al.  Race, social class, and IQ. , 1971, Science.

[3]  R. Light,et al.  Accumulating Evidence: Procedures for Resolving Contradictions among Different Research Studies. , 1971 .

[4]  S. Scarr-Salapatek.  Unknowns in the IQ Equation. (Book Reviews: Environment, Heredity, and Intelligence. Compiled from the Harvard Educational Review; The IQ Argument. Race, Intelligence and Education) , 1971 .

[5]  J. Mercer.  Pluralistic Diagnosis in the Evaluation of Black and Chicano Children: A Procedure for Taking Sociocultural Variables into Account in Clinical Assessment. , 1971 .

[6]  B. Birns,et al.  Social-Class Differentiation in Cognitive Development among Black Preschool Children. , 1971 .

[7]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  Intelligence and race. , 1970, Scientific American.

[8]  F. Fehr.  Critique of Hereditarian Accounts of "Intelligence" and Contrary Findings: A Reply to Jensen , 1969 .

[9]  M. Deutsch.  Happenings on the Way Back to the Forum: Social Science, IQ, and Race Differences Revisited. , 1969 .

[10]  A. Stinchcombe.  Environment: The Cumulation of Effects Is Yet to be Understood. , 1969 .

[11]  R. Light,et al.  Social Allocation Models of Intelligence: A Methodological Inquiry. , 1969 .

[12]  William F. Brazziel.  A Letter from the South , 1969 .

[13]  A. Jensen,et al.  How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement , 1969 .

[14]  R. Osborne,et al.  Racial Differences in Environmental Influences on Numerical Ability as Determined by Heritability Estimates , 1969, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  A. Gregor,et al.  Racial Differences in Heritability Estimates for Tests of Spatial Ability , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  A. Gregor,et al.  Heritability of Factor V: Verbal Comprehension , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  A. Jensen,et al.  Estimation of the limits of heritability of traits by comparison of monozygotic and dizygotic twins. , 1967, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  L. Jarvik,et al.  Genetics and Intelligence: A Review , 1963, Science.

[19]  B. Estes.  Influence of socioeconomic status on Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: addendum. , 1955, Journal of consulting psychology.

[20]  E. Graham,et al.  Use of the performance scale of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children with the deaf child. , 1953, Journal of consulting psychology.

[21]  B. Estes.  Influence of socioeconomic status on Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children; an exploratory study. , 1953, Journal of consulting psychology.

[22]  L. R. Wheeler.  A comparative study of the intelligence of East Tennessee mountain children. , 1942 .

[23]  W. Kennedy,et al.  A NORMATIVE SAMPLE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ACHIEVEMENT OF NEGRO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES. , 1963, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.