The end of public housing as we know it: public housing policy, labor regulation and the US city

In this article I argue that the US public housing policy, as codified by the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 (QHWRA), is helping to reconfigure the racial and class structure of many inner cities. By promoting the demolition of public housing projects and replacement with mixed-income housing developments, public housing policy is producing a gentrified inner-city landscape designed to attract middle and upper-class people back to the inner city. The goals of public housing policy are also broadly consonant with those of welfare reform wherein the 'workfare' system helps to bolster and produce the emergence of contingent low-wage urban labor markets. In a similar manner, I argue that public housing demonstration programs, such as the 'Welfare-to-Work' initiative, encourage public housing residents to join the lowwage labor market. Although the rhetoric surrounding the demolition of public housing emphasizes the economic opportunities made available by residential mobility, I argue that former public housing residents are simply being relocated into private housing within urban ghettos. Such a spatial fix to the problems of unemployment and poverty will not solve the problems of inner-city poverty. Will it take another round of urban riots before we seriously address the legacy of racism and discrimination that has shaped the US city? Copyright Joint Editors and Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2003.

[1]  S. Popkin,et al.  The Gautreaux Legacy: What Might Mixed‐Income and Dispersal Strategies Mean for the Poorest Public Housing Tenants? , 2000 .

[2]  J. Peck,et al.  Commentary: 'Work First': Workfare and the Regulation of Contingent Labour Markets , 2000 .

[3]  Elvin K. Wyly,et al.  Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification , 1999 .

[4]  Sharon Zukin How ‘Bad’ Is It?: Institutions and Intentions in the Study of the American Ghetto , 1998 .

[5]  Linda K. Stroh,et al.  Lake Parc Place: A study of mixed‐income housing , 1998 .

[6]  Margery Austin Turner,et al.  Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant‐based housing assistance , 1998 .

[7]  Loïc Wacquant Three Pernicious Premises in the Study of the American Ghetto , 1997 .

[8]  H. Donald Comment on Sandra J. Newman and Ann B. Schnare's “'… And a suitable living environment’: The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality” , 1997 .

[9]  A. Schnare,et al.  “… And a suitable living environment”: The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality , 1997 .

[10]  Lawrence J. Vale The Imaging of the City , 1995 .

[11]  James E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Changing the Geography of Opportunity by Expanding Residential Choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux Program , 1995 .

[12]  Nancy Fraser,et al.  A Genealogy of Dependency: Tracing a Keyword of the U.S. Welfare State , 1994, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[13]  Douglas S. Massey,et al.  Public housing and the concentration of poverty , 1993 .

[14]  D. Massey,et al.  Segregation in the Second Ghetto: Racial and Ethnic Segregation in American Public Housing, 1977 , 1991 .

[15]  J. Rosenbaum Black pioneers—do their moves to the suburbs increase economic opportunity for mothers and children? , 1991 .