A conceptual framework and its application for addressing leakage: the case of avoided deforestation

One of the most challenging technical issues associated with project-based mechanisms is that of leakage. A conceptual framework is proposed for the identification and analysis of leakage potentially generated by a project. The categorization of leakage based on the actors responsible for their manifestation is proposed, which divides sources of leakage into primary and secondary types. It is the actors or agents responsible for the baseline activities that cause primary leakage. Secondary leakage occurs when the project's outputs create incentives for third parties to increase emissions elsewhere. This distinction, based on the source of leakage, provides a basis for the analysis outlined in the paper. The extent and type of leakage will vary depending on the project typology and design. Using a decision tree approach, the process of identifying potential sources of leakage is demonstrated for the case study of avoided deforestation projects. If the main elements determining a baseline are properly identified and understood, in particular the 'baseline agents', a combination of the decision tree approach and apportioning responsibility, can assist in the quantification and monitoring of primary leakage. An analysis at the project design stage can also assist in minimizing the risk of future leakage. Econometric methods may prove more useful in analyzing secondary leakage.

[1]  B. Jong,et al.  Quantification and regulation of carbon offsets from forestry: comparison of alternative methodologies, with special reference to Chiapas, Mexico , 1998 .

[2]  R. Schwarze Activities Implemented Jointly: An Empirical Analysis , 2001 .

[3]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Land use & global climate change : forests, land management and the Kyoto Protocol , 2000 .

[4]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[5]  P. Brown,et al.  Carbon Counts: Estimating Climate Change Mitigation in Forestry Projects , 1997 .

[6]  Laura H. Kosloff,et al.  The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? , 1998 .

[7]  B. Sohngen,et al.  An Optimal Control Model of Forest Carbon Sequestration , 2003 .

[8]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Project-based activities , 2000 .

[9]  K. Chomitz Evaluating Carbon Offsets from Forestry and Energy Projects: How Do They Compare? , 1999 .

[10]  Catrinus Jepma,et al.  Climate Policy 3 , 2003 .

[11]  Pedro Moura-Costa,et al.  SGS Forestry's carbon offset verification service , 1998 .

[12]  M. Pinard,et al.  Elements of a certification system for forestry-based carbon offset projects , 2000 .

[13]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Issues and challenges for forest-based carbon-offset projects: A case study of the Noel Kempff climate action project in Bolivia , 2000 .

[14]  Hanqin Tian,et al.  Modelling spatial and temporal patterns of tropical land use change , 1995 .

[15]  B. Sohngen,et al.  Estimating Carbon Supply Curves for Global Forests and Other Land Uses April 2001, Discussion Paper 01-19 , 2001 .

[16]  K. Chomitz,et al.  Roads, land use, and deforestation : a spatial model applied to Belize , 1996 .

[17]  B. Sohngen,et al.  Forestry Sequestration of CO2 and Markets for Timber , 2000 .