A counselee-oriented perspective on risk communication in genetic counseling: Explaining the inaccuracy of the counselees' risk perception shortly after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure

Purpose: Genetic counseling may help counselees understand their genetic risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer. However, many studies have shown that their perception of their risks is inaccurate. Information-oriented variables often predicted the level of accuracy, focusing on specific processes of receiving and processing risks. We examined counselee-oriented predictors about how counselees embed cancer risks in their lives. These predictors reflect the personal meaning of genetic risks and are expected to explain/mediate the impact of genetic counseling on risk-perception-accuracy.Method: We analyzed 248 questionnaires of a prospective study, filled in by probands with breast/ovarian cancer and pathogenic mutations, unclassified variants, or uninformative results (n = 30, 16, and 202, respectively). Mediation regression analyses were performed to examine whether counselee predictors mediated/explained the influence of information predictors on the accuracy. Information-oriented predictors regarded presentation format, communicated information, question format, education, pedigree information, cancer experience, and cognitive processes/heuristics. Counselee-oriented predictors regarded their self/personality, life/existence, and need for certainty about DNA test result, heredity, and cancer.Results: Both information-oriented and counselee-oriented variables significantly predicted the accuracy of the counselees' risk perception, with moderate to large effect sizes. Counselee-oriented variables completely mediated/explained the effects of information-oriented variables on the accuracy.Discussion: Counselees seemed to transform objective cancer risks into personally relevant information. Only through this personal meaning of genetic information, information-oriented processes seemed to cause inaccurate perceptions. Genetic counselors are suggested to focus communication on these personal processes.

[1]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2‐result , 2012, Psycho-oncology.

[2]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Family communication matters: The impact of telling relatives about unclassified variants and uninformative DNA-test results , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[3]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Perceiving cancer‐risks and heredity‐likelihood in genetic‐counseling: how counselees recall and interpret BRCA 1/2‐test results , 2011, Clinical genetics.

[4]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  What are effective strategies to communicate cardiovascular risk information to patients? A systematic review. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[5]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives , 2010, Familial Cancer.

[6]  R. Klitzman.  Misunderstandings Concerning Genetics Among Patients Confronting Genetic Disease , 2010, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[7]  S. Lee.  Uncertain futures: Individual risk and social context in decision-making in cancer screening , 2010, Health, risk & society.

[8]  Yaniv Hanoch,et al.  Genetic testing and risk interpretation: How do women understand lifetime risk results? , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[9]  W. Breitbart,et al.  Meaning‐centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer: a pilot randomized controlled trial , 2010, Psycho-oncology.

[10]  R. Klitzman,et al.  “Am I my genes?”: Questions of identity among individuals confronting genetic disease , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[11]  G. Glendon,et al.  The BRCA Self‐Concept Scale: a new instrument to measure self‐concept in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers , 2009, Psycho-oncology.

[12]  L. Patrick-Miller,et al.  Controversies in Communication of Genetic Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer , 2009, The breast journal.

[13]  Kyung-Ah Kang,et al.  The Effect of Logotherapy on the Suffering, Finding Meaning, and Spiritual Well-being of Adolescents with Terminal Cancer , 2009 .

[14]  E. Friedman,et al.  Being ‘at-risk’ for developing cancer: cognitive representations and psychological outcomes , 2009, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[15]  Chris M. R. Smerecnik,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Impact of Genetic Counseling on Risk Perception Accuracy , 2009, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[16]  E. Danielson,et al.  Existential concerns among patients with cancer and interventions to meet them: an integrative literature review , 2009, Psycho-oncology.

[17]  T. Marteau,et al.  The impact of numeracy on reactions to different graphic risk presentation formats: An experimental analogue study. , 2009, British journal of health psychology.

[18]  Lidewij Henneman,et al.  Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[19]  Caroline F. Ockhuysen-Vermey,et al.  Design of the BRISC study: a multicentre controlled clinical trial to optimize the communication of breast cancer risks in genetic counselling , 2008, BMC Cancer.

[20]  T. Marteau,et al.  Clinical geneticists' and genetic counselors' views on the communication of genetic risks: a qualitative study. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[21]  V. Kraaij,et al.  How do cancer patients manage unattainable personal goals and regulate their emotions? , 2008, British journal of health psychology.

[22]  W. Otten,et al.  The counsellees' view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: recall, interpretation, and impact on life , 2008, Psycho-oncology.

[23]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[24]  J Dundon,et al.  Interventions to improve risk communication in clinical genetics: systematic review. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[25]  K. Wilson,et al.  Treatment of existential distress in life threatening illness: a review of manualized interventions. , 2008, Clinical psychology review.

[26]  J. Bower,et al.  Benefit Finding in Response to BRCA1/2 Testing , 2008, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[27]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Psychological Factors Associated with Emotional Responses to Receiving Genetic Risk Information , 2008, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[28]  G. Elwyn,et al.  How Risk is Perceived, Constructed and Interpreted by Clients in Clinical Genetics, and the Effects on Decision Making: Systematic Review , 2008, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[29]  Jürgen Kasper,et al.  Decision‐related uncertainties perceived by people with cancer—modelling the subject of shared decision making , 2008, Psycho-oncology.

[30]  S. Aranda,et al.  To what extent does meaning mediate adaptation to cancer? The relationship between physical suffering, meaning in life, and connection to others in adjustment to cancer , 2007, Palliative and Supportive Care.

[31]  B. LeRoy,et al.  Coming Full Circle: A Reciprocal-Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice , 2007, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[32]  W. Klein,et al.  Cancer Risk Elicitation and Communication: Lessons from the Psychology of Risk Perception , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[33]  H. Etchegary,et al.  Information Processing in the Context of Genetic Risk: Implications for Genetic-Risk Communication , 2007, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[34]  J. Klijn,et al.  Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study , 2006, Clinical genetics.

[35]  W. Rubinstein,et al.  Referral to cancer genetic counseling: Are there stages of readiness? , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics.

[36]  A. Kinney,et al.  Uncertainty in BRCA1 cancer susceptibility testing , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics.

[37]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  Measuring Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[38]  J. Coyne,et al.  Psychological interventions for distress in cancer patients: a review of reviews , 2006, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[39]  J. Barth,et al.  Variations in subjective breast cancer risk estimations when using different measurements for assessing breast cancer risk perception , 2006 .

[40]  R. Bennett,et al.  A New Definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ Task Force Report , 2006, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[41]  S. Thorne,et al.  Hope and Probability: Patient Perspectives of the Meaning of Numerical Information in Cancer Communication , 2006, Qualitative health research.

[42]  Shoshana Shiloh,et al.  Patients' information needs and decision-making processes: what can be learned from genetic counselees? , 2006, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[43]  J. Dale,et al.  The effectiveness of treatment for depression/depressive symptoms in adults with cancer: a systematic review , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[44]  Ellen Peters,et al.  A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: Contributions from judgment and decision-making research , 2006, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[45]  J. Simard,et al.  No Evidence of False Reassurance among Women with an Inconclusive BRCA1/2 Genetic Test Result , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[46]  D. Kahn,et al.  Transcending Breast Cancer , 2005, Journal of holistic nursing : official journal of the American Holistic Nurses' Association.

[47]  Susan McClement,et al.  Dignity therapy: a novel psychotherapeutic intervention for patients near the end of life. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  Penny Hopwood.  Psychosocial aspects of risk communication and mutation testing in familial breast-ovarian cancer , 2005, Current opinion in oncology.

[49]  T. Revenson,et al.  A contextual approach to treatment decision making among breast cancer survivors. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[50]  J. Goldblatt,et al.  Evaluating Genetic Counseling: Client Expectations, Psychological Adjustment and Satisfaction with Service , 2005, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[51]  W. Otten,et al.  What’s the message? Interpretation of an uninformative BRCA1/2 test result for women at risk of familial breast cancer , 2005, Genetics in Medicine.

[52]  H. Etchegary.  Psychological Aspects of Predictive Genetic‐Test Decisions: What Do We Know So Far? , 2004 .

[53]  S. Sutton,et al.  Illness perceptions and distress in women at increased risk of breast cancer , 2004 .

[54]  W. Otten,et al.  Feeling at risk: How women interpret their familial breast cancer risk , 2004, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[55]  Lidewij Henneman,et al.  Public Experiences, Knowledge and Expectations about Medical Genetics and the Use of Genetic Information , 2004, Public Health Genomics.

[56]  R. Eeles,et al.  Accommodating risk: responses to BRCA1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[57]  R. Eeles,et al.  Juggling roles and expectations: dilemmas faced by women talking to relatives about cancer and genetic testing , 2004 .

[58]  M. Schapira,et al.  Agreement Between Scales in the Measurement of Breast Cancer Risk Perceptions , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[59]  Stephen G West,et al.  Personality factors in older women's perceived susceptibility to diseases of aging. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[60]  N. Facione,et al.  Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review. , 2004, Preventive medicine.

[61]  D. Dierendonck,et al.  The construct validity of Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-being and its extension with spiritual well-being , 2004 .

[62]  R. Eeles,et al.  Family stories and the use of heuristics: women from suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[63]  P. Hopwood,et al.  Risk communication strategies: state of the art and effectiveness in the context of cancer genetic services , 2003, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[64]  M. McAllister.  Personal theories of inheritance, coping strategies, risk perception and engagement in hereditary non‐polyposis colon cancer families offered genetic testing , 2003, Clinical genetics.

[65]  W. Breitbart,et al.  Effect of spiritual well-being on end-of-life despair in terminally-ill cancer patients , 2003, The Lancet.

[66]  R. Eeles,et al.  Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information , 2003, Journal of medical ethics.

[67]  P. Butow,et al.  Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[68]  D. Cella,et al.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire. , 2002, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[69]  E. Gelmann,et al.  The impact of item order on ratings of cancer risk perception. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[70]  W. Otten,et al.  What do women really want to know? Motives for attending familial breast cancer clinics , 2002, Journal of medical genetics.

[71]  W. Klein,et al.  Dispositional, Unrealistic, and Comparative Optimism: Differential Relations with the Knowledge and Processing of Risk Information and Beliefs about Personal Risk , 2002 .

[72]  B. Meiser,et al.  What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[73]  H. Chochinov.  Dignity-conserving care--a new model for palliative care: helping the patient feel valued. , 2002, JAMA.

[74]  W. Breitbart,et al.  Spirituality, religion, and depression in the terminally ill. , 2002, Psychosomatics.

[75]  I. Langford.  An Existential Approach to Risk Perception , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[76]  H. Chochinov,et al.  Dignity in the terminally ill: a developing empirical model. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[77]  S. Sutton,et al.  Intention to Participate in Predictive Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer: The Role of Attitude toward Uncertainty , 2002 .

[78]  H. Skirton.  The Client's Perspective of Genetic Counseling—A Grounded Theory Study , 2001, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[79]  Angela Sammarco,et al.  Perceived Social Support, Uncertainty, and Quality of Life of Younger Breast Cancer Survivors , 2001, Cancer nursing.

[80]  L. d'Agincourt-Canning.  Experiences of genetic risk: disclosure and the gendering of responsibility. , 2001, Bioethics.

[81]  W. Burke,et al.  Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility may be based on unrealistic expectations. , 2001, American journal of medical genetics.

[82]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect , 2000, Prevention Science.

[83]  G. Evers‐Kiebooms,et al.  Cognitive representations of breast cancer, emotional distress and preventive health behaviour: a theoretical perspective , 2000, Psycho-oncology.

[84]  P. Hopwood,et al.  Breast cancer risk perception: what do we know and understand? , 2000, Breast Cancer Research.

[85]  A. Robertson.  Embodying risk, embodying political rationality: Women's accounts of risks for breast cancer , 2000 .

[86]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Certainty and uncertainty in genetic counselling: A qualitative case study , 2000, Psychology & health.

[87]  E. Giarelli.  Spiraling out of control: one case of pathologic anxiety as a response to a genetic risk of cancer. , 1999, Cancer nursing.

[88]  D. Cella,et al.  A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology , 1999, Psycho-oncology.

[89]  N. Hallowell.  Doing the right thing: genetic risk and responsibility , 1999 .

[90]  H. Welch,et al.  Women's Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[91]  D. Timmermans.  What Clinicians Can Offer: Assessing and Communicating Probabilities for Individual Patient Decision Making , 1999, Hormone Research in Paediatrics.

[92]  G. Anderson.  Storytelling: a holistic foundation for genetic nursing. , 1998, Holistic Nursing Practice.

[93]  A. Kavanagh,et al.  Embodied risk: my body, myself? , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[94]  C. Ryff,et al.  Personality and well-being: reexamining methods and meanings. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[95]  Susan Folkman,et al.  Meaning in the Context of Stress and Coping , 1997 .

[96]  Michael W. Bridges,et al.  Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[97]  Taylor Ej.  Factors associated with meaning in life among people with recurrent cancer. , 1993 .

[98]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Personal Need for Structure: Individual Differences in the Desire for Simple Structure , 1993 .

[99]  S. Thompson,et al.  Maintaining perceptions of control: finding perceived control in low-control circumstances. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[100]  R. Roos,et al.  DNA-testing for Huntington's disease in The Netherlands: a retrospective study on psychosocial effects. , 1992, American journal of medical genetics.

[101]  R. W. Trijsburg,et al.  Effects of psychological treatment on cancer patients: a critical review. , 1992, Psychosomatic medicine.

[102]  C. Carver,et al.  Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update , 1992, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[103]  Shelley E. Taylor.  Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. , 1983 .

[104]  M. Horowitz,et al.  Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress , 1979, Psychosomatic medicine.

[105]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Perceiving cancer-risks and heredity-likelihood in genetic-counseling: the analysis of the counselees’ recollections and interpretations of BRCA1/2-test results , 2011 .

[106]  Brenda Wilson,et al.  A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.

[107]  C. Verhaak,et al.  Genetic uptake in BRCA-mutation families is related to emotional and behavioral communication characteristics of index patients , 2004, Familial Cancer.

[108]  Rachael T. Brandt,et al.  Motivations and concerns of women considering genetic testing for breast cancer: a comparison between affected and at-risk probands. , 2002, Genetic testing.

[109]  K. Clark.  Depression , Hopelessness , and Desire for Hastened Death in Terminally Ill Patients With Cancer — Does Insurance Medicine Have a Role to Play ? , 2001 .

[110]  G. L. Heck,et al.  Ervaringen met een Nederlandse bewerking van de COPE copingvragenlijst : De COPE-Easy , 2000 .

[111]  K. Petrie,et al.  The illness perception questionnaire: A new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness , 1996 .

[112]  E. Taylor.  Factors associated with meaning in life among people with recurrent cancer. , 1993, Oncology nursing forum.

[113]  C. Ryff.  Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. , 1989 .

[114]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.