An Approach to Building High-Quality Tag Hierarchies from Crowdsourced Taxonomic Tag Pairs

Building taxonomies for web content is costly. An alternative is to allow users to create folksonomies, collective social classifications. However, folksonomies lack structure and their use for searching and browsing is limited. Current approaches for acquiring latent hierarchical structures from folksonomies have had limited success. We explore whether asking users for tag pairs, rather than individual tags, can increase the quality of derived tag hierarchies. We measure the usability cost, and in particular cognitive effort required to create tag pairs rather than individual tags. Our results show that when applied to tag pairs a hierarchy creation algorithm (Heymann-Benz) has superior performance than when applied to individual tags, and with little impact on usability. However, the resulting hierarchies lack richness, and could be seen as less expressive than those derived from individual tags. This indicates that expressivity, not usability, is the limiting factor for collective tagging approaches aimed at crowdsourcing taxonomies.

[1]  Yong Yu,et al.  Enriching WordNet with Folksonomies , 2008, PAKDD.

[2]  Pierre Andrews,et al.  Sense induction in folksonomies: a review , 2013, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[3]  Andrew Muddimer,et al.  The effect of experience on system usability scale ratings , 2012 .

[4]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  A Comparison of Questionnaires for Assessing Website Usability , 2004 .

[5]  Valentin Robu,et al.  The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging , 2007, WWW '07.

[6]  Joseph G. Davis,et al.  Computational and Crowdsourcing Methods for Extracting Ontological Structure from Folksonomy , 2010, ESWC.

[7]  Peter Mika,et al.  Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics , 2005, J. Web Semant..

[8]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Deriving concept hierarchies from text , 1999, SIGIR '99.

[9]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[10]  Dominik Benz,et al.  Semantics made by you and me: Self-emerging ontologies can capture the diversity of shared knowledge , 2010 .

[11]  Marieke Guy,et al.  Folksonomies: Tidying Up Tags? , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[12]  Jon Atle Gulla,et al.  Mining tag similarity in folksonomies , 2011, SMUC '11.

[13]  P. Schmitz,et al.  Inducing Ontology from Flickr Tags , 2006 .

[14]  James T. Miller,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Steffen Staab,et al.  On How to Perform a Gold Standard Based Evaluation of Ontology Learning , 2006, SEMWEB.

[16]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  The Semantic Web: Research and Applications , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[17]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[18]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[19]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  Mining Association Rules in Folksonomies , 2006, Data Science and Classification.

[20]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  Using WordNet to turn a Folksonomy into a Hierarchy of Concepts , 2007, SWAP.

[21]  Dean Allemang,et al.  The Semantic Web - ISWC 2006, 5th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2006, Athens, GA, USA, November 5-9, 2006, Proceedings , 2006, SEMWEB.

[22]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Collaborative Creation of Communal Hierarchical Taxonomies in Social Tagging Systems , 2006 .

[23]  Dominik Benz,et al.  Evaluation of Folksonomy Induction Algorithms , 2012, TIST.

[24]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Constructing folksonomies from user-specified relations on flickr , 2009, WWW '09.

[25]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..