Theoretical Insights into the Biophysics of Protein Bi-stability and Evolutionary Switches

Deciphering the effects of nonsynonymous mutations on protein structure is central to many areas of biomedical research and is of fundamental importance to the study of molecular evolution. Much of the investigation of protein evolution has focused on mutations that leave a protein’s folded structure essentially unchanged. However, to evolve novel folds of proteins, mutations that lead to large conformational modifications have to be involved. Unraveling the basic biophysics of such mutations is a challenge to theory, especially when only one or two amino acid substitutions cause a large-scale conformational switch. Among the few such mutational switches identified experimentally, the one between the GA all-α and GB α+β folds is extensively characterized; but all-atom simulations using fully transferrable potentials have not been able to account for this striking switching behavior. Here we introduce an explicit-chain model that combines structure-based native biases for multiple alternative structures with a general physical atomic force field, and apply this construct to twelve mutants spanning the sequence variation between GA and GB. In agreement with experiment, we observe conformational switching from GA to GB upon a single L45Y substitution in the GA98 mutant. In line with the latent evolutionary potential concept, our model shows a gradual sequence-dependent change in fold preference in the mutants before this switch. Our analysis also indicates that a sharp GA/GB switch may arise from the orientation dependence of aromatic π-interactions. These findings provide physical insights toward rationalizing, predicting and designing evolutionary conformational switches.

[1]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Consequences of localized frustration for the folding mechanism of the IM7 protein , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  Cation-π interactions in structural biology , 1999 .

[3]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  The Denatured State Dictates the Topology of Two Proteins with Almost Identical Sequence but Different Native Structure and Function* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Pressure-Dependent Properties of Elementary Hydrophobic Interactions: Ramifications for Activation Properties of Protein Folding. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[5]  Carlo Camilloni,et al.  From A to B: a ride in the free energy surfaces of protein G domains suggests how new folds arise. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  M. Harms,et al.  Evolutionary biochemistry: revealing the historical and physical causes of protein properties , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[7]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[8]  Adel Golovin,et al.  Cation-pi interactions in protein-protein interfaces. , 2005, Proteins.

[9]  Jeffrey Skolnick,et al.  All-atom ab initio folding of a diverse set of proteins. , 2006, Structure.

[10]  F. Diederich,et al.  Aromatic Rings in Chemical and Biological Recognition: Energetics and Structures , 2011 .

[11]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Fast folding of a prototypic polypeptide: The immunoglobulin binding domain of streptococcal protein G , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[12]  John Karanicolas,et al.  The origins of asymmetry in the folding transition states of protein L and protein G , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[13]  Wookyung Yu,et al.  Benchmarking all-atom simulations using hydrogen exchange , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity, proteinquakes, and the energy landscapes of functional transitions in proteins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Slow protein conformational dynamics from multiple experimental structures: the helix/sheet transition of arc repressor. , 2005, Structure.

[16]  Diogo Vila-Viçosa,et al.  A Simulated Intermediate State for Folding and Aggregation Provides Insights into ΔN6 β2-Microglobulin Amyloidogenic Behavior , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  P versus Q: structural reaction coordinates capture protein folding on smooth landscapes. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Alessandro Laio,et al.  A Collective Variable for the Efficient Exploration of Protein Beta-Sheet Structures: Application to SH3 and GB1. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[19]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Hydrophobic association of alpha-helices, steric dewetting, and enthalpic barriers to protein folding. , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Carl Troein,et al.  Mutation-induced fold switching among lattice proteins. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  Andrzej Kolinski,et al.  Folding pathway of the b1 domain of protein G explored by multiscale modeling. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[22]  Paul Robustelli,et al.  Water dispersion interactions strongly influence simulated structural properties of disordered protein states. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[23]  Per Jemth,et al.  Folding pathways of proteins with increasing degree of sequence identities but different structure and function , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  L. Serrano,et al.  A short linear peptide that folds into a native stable β-hairpin in aqueous solution , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[25]  A. Liwo,et al.  Protein structure prediction by global optimization of a potential energy function. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Jun Shimada,et al.  Commitment and nucleation in the protein G transition state. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  J. Onuchic,et al.  An all‐atom structure‐based potential for proteins: Bridging minimal models with all‐atom empirical forcefields , 2009, Proteins.

[28]  H. Chan,et al.  Theoretical perspectives on nonnative interactions and intrinsic disorder in protein folding and binding. , 2015, Current opinion in structural biology.

[29]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Coevolutionary information, protein folding landscapes, and the thermodynamics of natural selection , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  J. Skolnick,et al.  MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  GB1 is not a two-state folder: identification and characterization of an on-pathway intermediate. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[32]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  The ensemble folding kinetics of protein G from an all-atom Monte Carlo simulation , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  F. Diederich,et al.  Interactions with aromatic rings in chemical and biological recognition. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[34]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Insights from Coarse-Grained Gō Models for Protein Folding and Dynamics , 2009, International journal of molecular sciences.

[35]  C. Brooks,et al.  Exploring the folding free energy surface of a three-helix bundle protein. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  G. Schreiber,et al.  Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details. , 2009, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[37]  Ulrich H E Hansmann,et al.  Folding simulations of the A and B domains of protein G. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[38]  A. Fersht,et al.  Phi-value analysis and the nature of protein-folding transition states. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Scott Brown,et al.  Influence of denatured and intermediate states of folding on protein aggregation , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[40]  R J Williams,et al.  Topological mirror images in protein structure computation: An underestimated problem , 1991, Proteins.

[41]  T. Head-Gordon,et al.  Intermediates and the folding of proteins L and G , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[42]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[43]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Solution structure of a minor and transiently formed state of a T4 lysozyme mutant , 2011, Nature.

[44]  A. Laio,et al.  Characterization of the free-energy landscapes of proteins by NMR-guided metadynamics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Tao Chen,et al.  Native Contact Density and Nonnative Hydrophobic Effects in the Folding of Bacterial Immunity Proteins , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  P. Alexander,et al.  A minimal sequence code for switching protein structure and function , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  A Kolinski,et al.  Folding simulations and computer redesign of protein A three‐helix bundle motifs , 1996, Proteins.

[48]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Robustness and generalization of structure‐based models for protein folding and function , 2009, Proteins.

[49]  Lijun Zhou,et al.  Identifying the intermediates during the folding/unfolding of protein GB1 with MD simulations , 2012, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts.

[50]  William A Eaton,et al.  Experimental determination of upper bound for transition path times in protein folding from single-molecule photon-by-photon trajectories , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Mirror images as naturally competing conformations in protein folding. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[52]  John Orban,et al.  Mutational tipping points for switching protein folds and functions. , 2012, Structure.

[53]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  Atomic-level description of ubiquitin folding , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Ulrich H E Hansmann,et al.  Modeling Structural Flexibility of Proteins with Go-Models. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[55]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Competition between native topology and nonnative interactions in simple and complex folding kinetics of natural and designed proteins , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Adel Golovin,et al.  Cation–π interactions in protein–protein interfaces , 2005 .

[57]  M. Karplus,et al.  Kinetics of protein folding. A lattice model study of the requirements for folding to the native state. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  Jane R. Allison,et al.  Current computer modeling cannot explain why two highly similar sequences fold into different structures. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[59]  Harold W. Hatch,et al.  Computational study of the stability of the miniprotein trp-cage, the GB1 β-hairpin, and the AK16 peptide, under negative pressure. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[60]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[61]  Erich Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  Evolutionary Dynamics on Protein Bi-stability Landscapes can Potentially Resolve Adaptive Conflicts , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[62]  P. Alexander,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of the folding of the streptococcal protein G IgG-binding domains B1 and B2: why small proteins tend to have high denaturation temperatures. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[63]  A. Irbäck,et al.  An effective all-atom potential for proteins , 2009, PMC biophysics.

[64]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Effects of desolvation barriers and sidechains on local-nonlocal coupling and chevron behaviors in coarse-grained models of protein folding. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[65]  Vincent A Voelz,et al.  Taming the complexity of protein folding. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[66]  Anders Irbäck,et al.  PROFASI: A Monte Carlo simulation package for protein folding and aggregation , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..

[67]  Yang Zhang,et al.  I‐TASSER: Fully automated protein structure prediction in CASP8 , 2009, Proteins.

[68]  Osamu Miyashita,et al.  Conformational transitions of adenylate kinase: switching by cracking. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[69]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[70]  Maxim B. Prigozhin,et al.  Mapping fast protein folding with multiple-site fluorescent probes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  Erich Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  A structural model of latent evolutionary potentials underlying neutral networks in proteins. , 2007, HFSP journal.

[72]  Simone Marsili,et al.  Thermodynamics of stacking interactions in proteins. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[73]  E. Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  Modeling evolutionary landscapes: mutational stability, topology, and superfunnels in sequence space. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  Robert B Best,et al.  Discriminating binding mechanisms of an intrinsically disordered protein via a multi-state coarse-grained model. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[75]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Protein folding mediated by solvation: Water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[76]  G. Favrin,et al.  Monte Carlo update for chain molecules: Biased Gaussian steps in torsional space , 2001, cond-mat/0103580.

[77]  Y. Wang,et al.  Multiscaled exploration of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered molecular recognition element in measles virus nucleoprotein , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[78]  D. Baker,et al.  Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue–residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  Zhengwei Zhu,et al.  Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  Identification of a conserved aggregation-prone intermediate state in the folding pathways of Spc-SH3 amyloidogenic variants. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[81]  Stefan Wallin,et al.  Smooth functional transition along a mutational pathway with an abrupt protein fold switch. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[82]  Pernille R. Jensen,et al.  Continuous Molecular Evolution of Protein-Domain Structures by Single Amino Acid Changes , 2007, Current Biology.

[83]  Yaakov Levy,et al.  Nonnative electrostatic interactions can modulate protein folding: molecular dynamics with a grain of salt. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[84]  Jeffrey K. Noel,et al.  Interdomain Contacts Control Native State Switching of RfaH on a Dual-Funneled Landscape , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[85]  R. Dror,et al.  How Fast-Folding Proteins Fold , 2011, Science.

[86]  Ron Elber,et al.  The energy landscape of a protein switch. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[87]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Cooperativity, local-nonlocal coupling, and nonnative interactions: principles of protein folding from coarse-grained models. , 2011, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[88]  Francesco Luigi Gervasio,et al.  A Hybrid All-Atom Structure-Based Model for Protein Folding and Large Scale Conformational Transitions. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[89]  Carlo Camilloni,et al.  Lymphotactin: how a protein can adopt two folds. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[90]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Latent evolutionary potentials under the neutral mutational drift of an enzyme. , 2007, HFSP journal.

[91]  Lucy J. Colwell,et al.  The interface of protein structure, protein biophysics, and molecular evolution , 2012, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[92]  M. Karplus,et al.  Understanding beta-hairpin formation. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[93]  Arijit Roy,et al.  Computing the relative stabilities and the per-residue components in protein conformational changes. , 2014, Structure.

[94]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Accounting for a mirror-image conformation as a subtle effect in protein folding , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[95]  Soon-Ho Park,et al.  Folding dynamics of the B1 domain of protein G explored by ultrarapid mixing , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[96]  D. Theobald short communications Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of , 2005 .

[97]  Robert B Best,et al.  Microscopic events in β-hairpin folding from alternative unfolded ensembles , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[98]  D Baker,et al.  Critical role of beta-hairpin formation in protein G folding. , 2000, Nature structural biology.

[99]  Justin L. MacCallum,et al.  Hydrophobic association of α-helices, steric dewetting, and enthalpic barriers to protein folding , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[100]  T. Sosnick,et al.  Fast and slow intermediate accumulation and the initial barrier mechanism in protein folding. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[101]  Cecilia Clementi,et al.  Quantifying the roughness on the free energy landscape: entropic bottlenecks and protein folding rates. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[102]  Erich Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  Escape from Adaptive Conflict follows from weak functional trade-offs and mutational robustness , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[103]  Ron Elber,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of sequences of a protein switch , 2016, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[104]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  Cation-pi interactions in structural biology. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[105]  Yoichiro Ito,et al.  On the relation between fluctuation and response in biological systems , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[106]  Qiang Shao,et al.  Important roles of hydrophobic interactions in folding and charge interactions in misfolding of α-helix bundle protein , 2015 .

[107]  Jane R. Allison,et al.  Relative free enthalpies for point mutations in two proteins with highly similar sequences but different folds. , 2013, Biochemistry.

[108]  H. Chan,et al.  Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[109]  Thomas J Lane,et al.  MDTraj: a modern, open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories , 2014, bioRxiv.

[110]  Stefano Piana,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of physical models used in protein-folding simulations: quantitative evidence from long molecular dynamics simulations. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[111]  Peter G Bolhuis,et al.  Effects of a mutation on the folding mechanism of a beta-hairpin. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[112]  Robert T. Sauer,et al.  An evolutionary bridge to a new protein fold , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[113]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Protein Dynamism and Evolvability , 2009, Science.

[114]  Ron Elber,et al.  Computational exploration of the network of sequence flow between protein structures , 2010, Proteins.

[115]  C. Sander,et al.  Verification of protein structures : Side-chain planarity , 1996 .

[116]  KumarShankar,et al.  The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I , 1992 .

[117]  Ulrich H E Hansmann,et al.  Simulation of Top7-CFr: A transient helix extension guides folding , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[118]  Shachi Gosavi,et al.  Modeling Non‐Native Interactions in Designed Proteins , 2014 .

[119]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Folding a protein in a computer: An atomic description of the folding/unfolding of protein A , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[120]  D. Baker,et al.  Critical role of β-hairpin formation in protein G folding , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[121]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[122]  M. J. Parker,et al.  Amyloid formation under physiological conditions proceeds via a native-like folding intermediate , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[123]  Diwakar Shukla,et al.  Complex pathways in folding of protein G explored by simulation and experiment. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[124]  H. Chan,et al.  Theoretical and experimental demonstration of the importance of specific nonnative interactions in protein folding , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[125]  F. Blanco,et al.  NMR solution structure of the isolated N-terminal fragment of protein-G B1 domain. Evidence of trifluoroethanol induced native-like beta-hairpin formation. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[126]  S. Mohanty,et al.  Folding of Top7 in unbiased all‐atom Monte Carlo simulations , 2013, Proteins.

[127]  M. Matz,et al.  Evolution of Coral Pigments Recreated , 2004, Science.

[128]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Folding mechanisms of proteins with high sequence identity but different folds. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[129]  John Orban,et al.  The design and characterization of two proteins with 88% sequence identity but different structure and function , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[130]  S. Takada,et al.  On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction , 2002 .