Maximal revenue with multiple goods: Nonmonotonicity and other observations

Consider the problem of maximizing the revenue from selling a number of goods to a single buyer. We show that, unlike the case of one good, when the buyer's values for the goods increase the seller's maximal revenue may well decrease. We then identify two circumstances where monotonicity does obtain: when optimal mechanisms are deterministic and symmetric, and when they have submodular prices. Next, through simple and transparent examples, we clarify the need for and the advantage of randomization when maximizing revenue in the multiple-good versus the one-good case. Finally, we consider "seller-favorable" mechanisms, the only ones that matter when maximizing revenue. They are essential for our positive monotonicity results, and they also circumvent well-known nondifferentiability issues.

[1]  R. Rockafellar Convex Analysis: (pms-28) , 1970 .

[2]  William James Adams,et al.  What Makes Advertising Profitable , 1977 .

[3]  丸山 徹 Convex Analysisの二,三の進展について , 1977 .

[4]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[5]  J. Rochet The taxation principle and multi-time Hamilton-Jacobi equations☆ , 1985 .

[6]  R. McAfee,et al.  Multidimensional incentive compatibility and mechanism design , 1988 .

[7]  M. Armstrong Multiproduct Nonlinear Pricing , 1996 .

[8]  P. Reny,et al.  On the failure of the linkage principle in multi-unit auctions , 1999 .

[9]  V. Krishna,et al.  Convex Potentials with an Application to Mechanism Design , 2001 .

[10]  F. Schoenberg,et al.  Approximating the Distribution of Pareto Sums , 2003 .

[11]  John Thanassoulis,et al.  Haggling over substitutes , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  H. Fang,et al.  To Bundle or Not to Bundle , 2005 .

[13]  Alejandro M. Manelli,et al.  Bundling as an optimal selling mechanism for a multiple-good monopolist , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[14]  M. Pycia Stochastic vs Deterministic Mechanisms in Multidimensional Screening , 2006 .

[15]  Philippe Jehiel,et al.  Mixed Bundling Auctions , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[16]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  Algorithmic pricing via virtual valuations , 2007, EC '07.

[17]  Alejandro M. Manelli,et al.  Multidimensional Mechanism Design: Revenue Maximization and the Multiple-Good Monopoly , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[18]  Stochastic Orders , 2008 .

[19]  D. Menicucci Competition May Reduce the Revenue in a First Price Auction with Affiliated Private Values , 2009 .

[20]  Jason D. Hartline,et al.  Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing , 2009, STOC '10.

[21]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Pricing randomized allocations , 2009, SODA '10.

[22]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  On optimal single-item auctions , 2010, STOC '11.

[23]  G. Pavlov,et al.  Optimal Mechanism for Selling Two Goods , 2011 .

[24]  Omer Lev,et al.  A two-dimensional problem of revenue maximization , 2011 .

[25]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  On Optimal Multi-Dimensional Mechanism Design , 2011, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[26]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Approximate revenue maximization with multiple items , 2012, EC '12.

[27]  Nir Shabbat Approximate Revenue Maximization with Multiple Items , 2012 .

[28]  Alejandro M. Manelli,et al.  Multidimensional mechanism design: Revenue maximization and the multiple-good monopoly. A corrigendum , 2012, J. Econ. Theory.

[29]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Symmetries and optimal multi-dimensional mechanism design , 2012, EC '12.

[30]  Noam Nisan,et al.  The menu-size complexity of auctions , 2013, EC '13.

[31]  Noam Nisan,et al.  The Menu-Size Complexity of Auctions (Working Paper) , 2013 .

[32]  S. Hart,et al.  How Good Are Simple Mechanisms for Selling Multiple Goods , 2014 .