Dual-source CT for visualization of the coronary arteries in heart transplant patients with high heart rates.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of dual-source CT images of the coronary arteries in heart transplant recipients with high heart rates. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Contrast-enhanced dual-source CT coronary angiography was performed on 23 heart transplant recipients (20 men, three women; mean age, 61.1 +/- 12.8 years). Data sets were reconstructed in 5% steps from 30% to 80% of the R-R interval. Two blinded independent readers using a 5-point scale (0, not evaluative; 4, excellent quality) assessed the quality of images of coronary segments. RESULTS The mean heart rate during scanning was 89.2 +/- 10.4 beats/min. Interobserver agreement on the quality of images of the whole coronary tree was a kappa value of 0.78 and for selection of the optimal reconstruction interval was a kappa value of 0.82. The optimal reconstruction interval was systole in 17 (74%) of the 23 of heart transplant recipients. At the best reconstruction interval, diagnostic image quality (score >or= 2) was obtained in 92.1% (303 of 329) of the coronary artery segments. The mean image quality score for the whole coronary tree was 3.1 +/- 1.01. No significant correlation between mean heart rate (rho = 0.31) or heart rate variability (rho = 0.23) and overall image quality score was observed (p = not significant). CONCLUSION Dual-source CT acquisition yields coronary angiograms of diagnostic quality in heart transplant recipients. Mean heart rate and heart rate variability during scanning do not have a negative effect on the overall quality of images of the coronary arteries.

[1]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  C. Herzog,et al.  Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy? , 2007, Radiology.

[3]  Shawn A. Gregory,et al.  Analysis of cardiac dimensions, mass and function in heart transplant recipients using 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. , 2007, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[4]  J. Barkhausen,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Acta radiologica.

[5]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[6]  Shawn A. Gregory,et al.  Comparison of sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography to coronary angiography with intravascular ultrasound for the detection of transplant vasculopathy. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  Mario J. Garcia,et al.  Detection of transplant coronary artery disease using multidetector computed tomography with adaptative multisegment reconstruction. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience , 2006, European Radiology.

[10]  M. Reiser,et al.  Image Quality, Motion Artifacts, and Reconstruction Timing of 64-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With 0.33-Second Rotation Speed , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[11]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[12]  W. Kalender,et al.  Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography--initial experience. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[13]  G. Raff,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. , 2005, Medical physics.

[15]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. , 2005, European heart journal.

[16]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Paul,et al.  Coronary Stenosis Detection by 16-Slice Computed Tomography in Heart Transplant Patients: Comparison With Conventional Angiography and Impact on Clinical Management , 2005 .

[18]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound evidence of angiographically silent progression in coronary atherosclerosis predicts long-term morbidity and mortality after cardiac transplantation. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Peter Hunold,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  K Stierstorfer,et al.  Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[21]  E. Trulock,et al.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-first official adult lung and heart-lung transplant report--2004. , 2004, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[22]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  K. Bae,et al.  Multi-detector row computed tomographic angiography in pediatric heart transplant recipients: Initial observations , 2004, Transplantation.

[24]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Detection of Calcified and Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Contrast-Enhanced, Submillimeter Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography: A Segment-Based Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound , 2003, Circulation.

[25]  C. Herzog,et al.  Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality , 2002, European Radiology.

[26]  B. Ohnesorge,et al.  Heart Rate Adaptive Optimization of Spatial and Temporal Resolution for Electrocardiogram-Gated Multislice Spiral CT of the Heart , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[27]  M A Hlatky,et al.  American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. , 2001 .

[28]  B. Madden,et al.  Low clinical utility of routine angiographic surveillance in the detection and management of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in transplant recipients , 2001, Clinical cardiology.

[29]  P. Ganz,et al.  Cardiac allograft vasculopathy , 2000, Current opinion in cardiology.

[30]  M. Mehra,et al.  Presence of severe intimal thickening by intravascular ultrasonography predicts cardiac events in cardiac allograft vasculopathy. , 1995, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[31]  D. Renlund,et al.  Task force 5: Complications , 1993 .

[32]  R. Wilson,et al.  Chest pain in cardiac-transplant recipients. Evidence of sensory reinnervation after cardiac transplantation. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  F J Pinto,et al.  Intracoronary Ultrasound in Cardiac Transplant Recipients: In Vivo Evidence of “Angiographically Silent” Intimal Thickening , 1991, Circulation.

[34]  S. Kovacs.  The duration of the QT interval as a function of heart rate: a derivation based on physical principles and a comparison to measured values. , 1985, American heart journal.

[35]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[36]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[37]  A. Schröter,et al.  # Springer-Verlag 2006 , 2005 .

[38]  Michael Grass,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. , 2005, Radiology.

[39]  Gustavo Rincon,et al.  Lumen Loss in Transplant Coronary Artery Disease Is a Biphasic Process Involving Early Intimal Thickening and Late Constrictive Remodeling Results From a 5-Year Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study , 2001 .