Robust speed measurements with standard wireless devices

Speed measurements are crucial for controlling traffic and in supporting automation of industrial processes. The speed of moving objects is typically measured from a stationary position using time-of-flight or the Doppler effect. Existing approaches require either relatively bulky physical devices or complex signal processing. The authors propose a new method for measuring the speed of (metal) objects moving on a fixed track. The authors' method is applicable, e.g. to cars on a road, trains on rails, or goods sliding on a conveyor belt. The method relies on the constructive and destructive interference patterns created by the reflections from the moving target. Speed is determined by measuring the signal strength of received messages as perceived by standard wireless devices. The method requires only minimal signal processing and only two commodity wireless transceivers, which are independent of the moving target. The advantages of their system compared to other technologies are reduced size, reduced cost, and in some scenarios robustness.

[1]  T. Pàmies,et al.  Aircraft tracking by means of the Acoustical Doppler Effect , 2013 .

[2]  Erwin Biebl,et al.  A cooperative transponder system for improved traffic safety, localizing road users in the 5 GHz band , 2012 .

[3]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  Nuzzer: A Large-Scale Device-Free Passive Localization System for Wireless Environments , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[4]  Daisuke Inoue,et al.  Amplitude-Modulated Laser Radar for Range and Speed Measurement in Car Applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  Coloring unstructured wireless multi-hop networks , 2009, PODC '09.

[6]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  The SpiderBat ultrasound positioning system , 2010, SenSys '10.

[7]  K. Hatakeyama,et al.  Detection of buried human body by electromagnetic wave reflection , 1999, 1999 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (IEEE Cat. No.99EX147).

[8]  F. Colone,et al.  Comparison of Clutter and Multipath Cancellation Techniques for Passive Radar , 2007, 2007 IEEE Radar Conference.

[9]  W.D. White,et al.  Low-Angle Radar Tracking in the Presence of Multipath , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  Erwin M. Biebl,et al.  Sensor resource management with cooperative sensors for preventive vehicle safety applications , 2013, 2013 Workshop on Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF).

[11]  M. Vossiek,et al.  Precise Distance and Velocity Measurement for Real Time Locating in Multipath Environments Using a Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave Secondary Radar Approach , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[12]  Shambhu Upadhyaya,et al.  Is RSSI a Reliable Parameter in Sensor Localization Algorithms – An Experimental Study , 2009 .

[13]  Mohamed Rehan Karim,et al.  Vehicle speed detection in video image sequences using CVS method , 2010 .

[14]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Experimental comparison of RSSI-based localization algorithms for indoor wireless sensor networks , 2008, REALWSN '08.

[15]  Hao Xu,et al.  Experimental evaluation of reducing ranging-error based on receive signal strength indication in wireless sensor networks , 2015, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst..

[16]  M. Baentsch,et al.  Mote Runner: A Multi-language Virtual Machine for Small Embedded Devices , 2009, 2009 Third International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications.

[17]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  CoSDEO 2016 Keynote: A decade later — Challenges: Device-free passive localization for wireless environments , 2007, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[18]  Benjamin Friedlander,et al.  Accuracy of source localization using multipath delays , 1988 .

[19]  K. W. Lo,et al.  Aircraft flight parameter estimation using acoustic multipath delays , 2003 .

[20]  Ratnasingham Tharmarasa,et al.  Multipath-assisted multitarget tracking using multiframe assignment , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[21]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Looking at Vehicles on the Road: A Survey of Vision-Based Vehicle Detection, Tracking, and Behavior Analysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[22]  Fabrice Valois,et al.  Is RSSI a Good Choice for Localization in Wireless Sensor Network? , 2012, 2012 IEEE 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications.

[23]  Scott D. Coutts Passive localization of moving emitters using out-of-plane multipath , 2000, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst..

[24]  A. Stelzer,et al.  A 77-GHz Cooperative Radar System Based on Multi-Channel FMCW Stations for Local Positioning Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[25]  Maurizio Valle,et al.  Indoor ranging and localisation algorithm based on received signal strength indicator using statistic parameters for wireless sensor networks , 2015, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst..

[26]  Neal Patwari,et al.  Through-Wall Tracking Using Variance-Based Radio Tomography Networks , 2009, ArXiv.

[27]  Erwin Biebl,et al.  A 2.4 GHz high precision local positioning system based on cooperative roundtrip time of flight ranging , 2014 .

[28]  R.-S. Chang,et al.  Tracking objects using hexagons in sensor networks , 2012, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst..