SPoC: A novel framework for relating the amplitude of neuronal oscillations to behaviorally relevant parameters

Previously, modulations in power of neuronal oscillations have been functionally linked to sensory, motor and cognitive operations. Such links are commonly established by relating the power modulations to specific target variables such as reaction times or task ratings. Consequently, the resulting spatio-spectral representation is subjected to neurophysiological interpretation. As an alternative, independent component analysis (ICA) or alternative decomposition methods can be applied and the power of the components may be related to the target variable. In this paper we show that these standard approaches are suboptimal as the first does not take into account the superposition of many sources due to volume conduction, while the second is unable to exploit available information about the target variable. To improve upon these approaches we introduce a novel (supervised) source separation framework called Source Power Comodulation (SPoC). SPoC makes use of the target variable in the decomposition process in order to give preference to components whose power comodulates with the target variable. We present two algorithms that implement the SPoC approach. Using simulations with a realistic head model, we show that the SPoC algorithms are able extract neuronal components exhibiting high correlation of power with the target variable. In this task, the SPoC algorithms outperform other commonly used techniques that are based on the sensor data or ICA approaches. Furthermore, using real electroencephalography (EEG) recordings during an auditory steady state paradigm, we demonstrate the utility of the SPoC algorithms by extracting neuronal components exhibiting high correlation of power with the intensity of the auditory input. Taking into account the results of the simulations and real EEG recordings, we conclude that SPoC represents an adequate approach for the optimal extraction of neuronal components showing coupling of power with continuously changing behaviorally relevant parameters.

[1]  Bernadette C. M. van Wijk,et al.  On the Influence of Amplitude on the Connectivity between Phases , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[2]  A. Dimitrijevic,et al.  Efficient Stimuli for Evoking Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[3]  Christopher James,et al.  Neuronal oscillations in the EEG under varying cognitive load: A comparative study between slow waves and faster oscillations , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Gamma-band activity over early sensory areas predicts detection of changes in audiovisual speech stimuli , 2006, NeuroImage.

[6]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Large-scale EEG/MEG source localization with spatial flexibility , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  Philippe Kahane,et al.  High gamma frequency oscillatory activity dissociates attention from intention in the human premotor cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[8]  Barbara F. Händel,et al.  Top-Down Controlled Alpha Band Activity in Somatosensory Areas Determines Behavioral Performance in a Discrimination Task , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Theta and Gamma Oscillations Predict Encoding and Retrieval of Declarative Memory , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Andreas Ziehe,et al.  Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction , 2008, NeuroImage.

[11]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Enhanced Performance by a Hybrid Nirs–eeg Brain Computer Interface , 2022 .

[12]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Recipes for the linear analysis of EEG , 2005, NeuroImage.

[13]  T. Jung,et al.  Tonic, phasic, and transient EEG correlates of auditory awareness in drowsiness. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  Robert Du,et al.  Towards measurement of brain function in operational environments , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[15]  R. Romo,et al.  Beta oscillations in the monkey sensorimotor network reflect somatosensory decision making , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Causal influence of gamma oscillations on the sensorimotor rhythm , 2011, NeuroImage.

[17]  S. Baker Oscillatory interactions between sensorimotor cortex and the periphery , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  M. Delong,et al.  Deep-Brain Stimulation for Basal Ganglia Disorders. , 2011, Basal ganglia.

[19]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Introduction to machine learning for brain imaging , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  E. Garcia-Rill,et al.  Gamma Band Activity , 2015 .

[21]  Kristian Lukander,et al.  Estimating Brain Load from the EEG , 2009, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[22]  D. Linden,et al.  What, When, Where in the Brain? Exploring Mental Chronometry with Brain Imaging and Electrophysiology , 2007, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[23]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity , 1997, Neuroreport.

[24]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[25]  G. Nolte,et al.  Analytic expansion of the EEG lead field for realistic volume conductors , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  E. Basar,et al.  Alpha oscillations in brain functioning: an integrative theory. , 1997, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[28]  Jochen Kaiser,et al.  Human γ-band activity and behavior. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[29]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  It is not all about phase: Amplitude dynamics in corticomuscular interactions , 2013, NeuroImage.

[30]  T. Hafting,et al.  Frequency of gamma oscillations routes flow of information in the hippocampus , 2009, Nature.

[31]  Daniel Gembris,et al.  Top-down attentional processing enhances auditory evoked gamma band activity , 2003, Neuroreport.

[32]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Prediction of response speed by anticipatory high‐frequency (gamma band) oscillations in the human brain , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[33]  M. Scherg,et al.  Intracerebral Sources of Human Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2004, Brain Topography.

[34]  M Hämäläinen,et al.  Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[36]  Haipeng Shen,et al.  EEG/MEG Source Reconstruction with Spatial-Temporal Two-Way Regularized Regression , 2013, Neuroinformatics.

[37]  T W Picton,et al.  The human auditory steady-state evoked potentials. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[38]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  The relationship between peripheral and early cortical activation induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  S. Makeig,et al.  A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  F. Meinecke,et al.  Analysis of Multimodal Neuroimaging Data , 2011, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[41]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Modern mental chronometry , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[42]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[43]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  A resampling approach to estimate the stability of one-dimensional or multidimensional independent components , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady state responses: effects of intensity and frequency. , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[46]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Spontaneous locally restricted EEG alpha activity determines cortical excitability in the motor cortex , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[48]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[49]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Ethem Alpaydin,et al.  Introduction to machine learning , 2004, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[51]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Attention modulates gamma-band oscillations differently in the human lateral occipital cortex and fusiform gyrus. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The non-invasive Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects , 2007, NeuroImage.

[53]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric fields of the brain , 1981 .

[54]  B. Blankertz,et al.  Pre-Stimulus Sensorimotor Rhythms Influence Brain–Computer Interface Classification Performance , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[55]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Induced alpha band power changes in the human EEG and attention , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[56]  Steven G Potkin,et al.  ALPHA EEG PREDICTS VISUAL REACTION TIME , 2006, The International journal of neuroscience.

[57]  E. Harth,et al.  Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of Eeg , 2005 .

[58]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Modulation of electroencephalographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation: evidence for changes in cortical excitability related to movement , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[59]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[60]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Analyzing Local Structure in Kernel-Based Learning: Explanation, Complexity, and Reliability Assessment , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[61]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  The role of neuronal synchronization in selective attention , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[62]  Irwin Feinberg,et al.  Kinetics of NREM delta EEG power density across NREM periods depend on age and on delta-band designation. , 2007, Sleep.

[63]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Electromagnetic brain mapping , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[64]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Tactile Spatial Attention Enhances Gamma-Band Activity in Somatosensory Cortex and Reduces Low-Frequency Activity in Parieto-Occipital Areas , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.