NCTE/CCCC’s Recent War on Scholarship

This article documents aspects of the history of support for scholarship by two professional organizations involved with teaching composition at the postsecondary level: the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) and the Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC). Evidence is found that for the past two decades, the two organizations have substantially withdrawn their sponsorship of one kind of scholarship. That scholarship is defined as RAD: replicable, aggregable, and data supported. The history of RAD scholarship as published in NCTE and CCCC books and journals, compared to that published elsewhere, is traced from 1940 to 1999 in three areas: teaching of the research paper, gain in writing skills during a writing course, and methods of peer critique. The history of NCTE and CCCC attempts at scholarly bibliography is also traced. Implications are considered for the future of the study of college composition as an academic discipline.

[1]  Keith Baker,et al.  The Educational Effectiveness of Bilingual Education. , 1996 .

[2]  E. Boyer Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[3]  E. Flynn Feminism and Scientism. , 1995 .

[4]  Robert J. Connors,et al.  Textbooks and the Evolution of the Discipline. , 1986 .

[5]  M. S. Macnealy Strategies for Empirical Research in Writing , 1998 .

[6]  Davida Charney Empiricism Is not a Four-Letter Word. , 1996 .

[7]  Bernard Susser,et al.  The mysterious disappearance of word processing , 1998 .

[8]  Joan Rothstein-Vandergriff,et al.  Collaboration with Basic Writers in the Composition Classroom. , 1988 .

[9]  Robert C. Harvey Annotated Index to the English Journal, First Supplement: 1964-1970. , 1972 .

[10]  D. Charney From Logocentrism to Ethocentrism: Historicizing Critiques of Writing Research , 1998 .

[11]  John S. Lochrie Perry revisited—A fresh look at Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years , 1989 .

[12]  Doris V. Gunderson Research in the Teaching of English , 1971, English Journal.

[13]  The One-to-One Method of Teaching Composition. , 1984 .

[14]  Linda Flower,et al.  Cognition, Context, and Theory Building , 1989 .

[15]  Maxine C. Hairston Breaking our Bonds and Reaffirming our Connections , 1985 .

[16]  George Hillocks,et al.  Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. , 1986 .

[17]  Ann M. Penrose,et al.  Hearing Ourselves Think: Cognitive Research in the College Writing Classroom. Social and Cognitive Studies in Writing and Literacy. , 1993 .

[18]  Richard L. Larson,et al.  Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching , 1987 .

[19]  Cynthia L. Johanek,et al.  Composing Research: A Contextualist Research Paradigm for Rhetoric and Composition , 2000 .

[20]  Carol Berkenkotter,et al.  Paradigm Debates, Turf Wars, and the Conduct of Sociocognitive Inquiry in Composition. , 1991 .

[21]  Stephen M. North,et al.  The Making of Knowledge in Composition: Portrait of an Emerging Field. , 1989 .

[22]  R. Connors The Erasure of the Sentence , 2000, College Composition & Communication.

[23]  William G. Perry join The 600-Word Theme and Human Dignity , 1953 .

[24]  Robert J. Connors,et al.  Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy , 1997 .

[25]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[26]  Jennifer Beech Redneck and Hillbilly Discourse in the Writing Classroom: Classifying Critical Pedagogies of Whiteness. , 2004 .

[27]  Robert Scholes,et al.  The Rise and Fall of English: Reconstructing English as a Discipline , 1998 .

[28]  James E. Ford Teaching the research paper: from theory to practice, from research to writing , 1995 .

[29]  George Braine Writing Across the Curriculum: A Case Study of Faculty Practices at a Research University. , 1990 .

[30]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[31]  J. E. Ford,et al.  Research Paper Instruction in the Undergraduate Writing Program. , 1982 .