End-digits preference for self-reported height depends on language

BackgroundWhen individuals report figures, they often prefer to round to specific end-digits (e.g. zero). Such preference has been found in reports of body weight, cigarette consumption or blood pressure measurements. Very little is known about self-reported body height. End-digit preference can distort estimates of prevalence and other statistical parameters. This study examines end-digit preference for self-reported height and how it relates with sex, age, educational level or cultural affiliation.MethodsWe analysed reports of height of 47,192 individuals (aged 15 years or older) living in Switzerland and participating in one of the three population-based Swiss Health Surveys carried out in 1992/93, 1997 and 2002 respectively. Digit preferences were analysed by sex, age group, educational level, survey, smoking status, interview language (only for Swiss nationals) and nationality. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval were calculated by using multivariate logistic regression.ResultsItalian and French nationals (44.1% and 40.6%) and Italian and French Swiss (39.6% and 35.3%) more strongly preferred zero and five than Germans and German Swiss (29.2% and 30.3%). Two, four, six and eight were more popular in Germans and German Swiss (both 44.4%). Compared to German Swiss (OR = 1), for the end-digits zero and five, the OR were 1.50 (1.38–1.63) for Italian Swiss and 1.24 (1.18–1.30) for French Swiss; 1.73 (1.58–1.89) for Italian nationals and 1.61 (1.33–1.95) for French nationals. The end-digits two, four, six and eight showed an opposite pattern.ConclusionDifferent preferences for end-digits depending on language and nationality could be observed consistently in all three national health surveys. The patterns were strikingly similar in Swiss and foreign nationals speaking the same language, suggesting that preferences were specific to language rather than to nationality. Taking into account rounding preferences could allow more valid comparisons in analyses of self-reported data originating from different cultures.

[1]  A. Chiolero,et al.  Obesity in Switzerland: do estimates depend on how body mass index has been assessed? , 2008, Swiss medical weekly.

[2]  G David Batty,et al.  Adult socioeconomic position and the association between height and coronary heart disease mortality: findings from 33 years of follow-up in the Whitehall Study. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[3]  M. Cogswell,et al.  Validity of Self-reported Pregnancy Delivery Weight: An Analysis of the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey , 1999 .

[4]  Robert J Adams,et al.  How valid are self‐reported height and weight? A comparison between CATI self‐report and clinic measurements using a large cohort study , 2006, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[5]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Validity of self-reported weight and height in the French GAZEL cohort , 2000, International Journal of Obesity.

[6]  T. Byers,et al.  THE VALIDITY OF SELF‐REPORTS OF PAST BODY WEIGHTS BY U.S. ADULTS , 1995, Epidemiology.

[7]  S. Kanazawa Big and tall soldiers are more likely to survive battle: a possible explanation for the 'returning soldier effect' on the secondary sex ratio. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[8]  M. Cogswell,et al.  Validity of self-reported pregnancy delivery weight: an analysis of the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey. NMIHS Collaborative Working Group. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  C. Murray,et al.  Trends in national and state-level obesity in the USA after correction for self-report bias: analysis of health surveys. , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[10]  C. Nelson,et al.  Food insecurity and obesity: a comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. , 2008, American journal of public health.

[11]  T. Judge,et al.  The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: preliminary test of a theoretical model. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  A. Stewart,et al.  The reliability and validity of self-reported weight and height. , 1982, Journal of chronic diseases.

[13]  D. Moher,et al.  A comparison of direct vs. self‐report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review , 2007, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[14]  C. Barbaranelli,et al.  National Character Does Not Reflect Mean Personality Trait Levels in 49 Cultures , 2005, Science.

[15]  C. Sempos,et al.  Ethnic variation in validity of classification of overweight and obesity using self-reported weight and height in American women and men: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey , 2005, Nutrition journal.

[16]  R. Marshall,et al.  Zero end-digit preference in recorded blood pressure and its impact on classification of patients for pharmacologic management in primary care - PREDICT-CVD-6. , 2007, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[17]  R. Heller,et al.  Risk factor measurement quality in primary care routine data was variable but nondifferential between individuals. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  K. Flegal,et al.  Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  S de Lusignan,et al.  End-digit preference in blood pressure recordings of patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care , 2004, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[20]  R. Kuczmarski,et al.  Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. , 2001, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[21]  M. Rowland,et al.  Self-reported weight and height. , 1990, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[22]  J. Seidell,et al.  Underreporting of BMI in Adults and Its Effect on Obesity Prevalence Estimations in the Period 1998 to 2001 , 2006, Obesity.

[23]  M. Marmot,et al.  Adult height in relation to mortality from 14 cancer sites in men in London (UK): evidence from the original Whitehall study. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[24]  J. Bassino Inequality in Japan (1892-1941): physical stature, income, and health. , 2006, Economics and human biology.

[25]  Nicolas Herpin Love, careers, and heights in France, 2001. , 2005, Economics and human biology.

[26]  M Debon,et al.  Are self-reports of smoking rate biased? Evidence from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Cognitive function in childhood and early adulthood and injuries later in life: the Metropolit 1953 male birth cohort. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.

[28]  R J Prineas,et al.  Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[29]  T. Christensen,et al.  An evaluation of the relationship between adult height and health‐related quality of life in the general UK population , 2007, Clinical endocrinology.

[30]  F. Gutzwiller,et al.  Trends in cardiovascular risk factors (1984-1993) in a Swiss region: results of three population surveys. , 1997, Preventive medicine.