The Quality Interaction Function Deployment for lean Human-Robot Interaction

In standardized sectors such as the automotive, the cost-benefit ratio of automation solutions is high as they contribute to increase capacity, decrease costs and improve product quality. In less standardized application fields, the contribution of automation to improvements in capacity, cost and quality blurs. The automation of complex and unstructured tasks requires sophisticated, expensive and low-performing systems, whose impact on product quality is oftentimes not directly perceived by customers. As a result, the full automation of process chains in the general manufacturing or the logistic sectors is often a sub-optimal solution. Taking the distance from the false idea that a process should be either fully automated, or fully manual, this paper presents a novel heuristic method for design of lean human-robot interaction, the Quality Interaction Function Deployment, with the objective of the “right level of automation”. Functions are divided among human and automated agents and several automation scenarios are created and evaluated with respect to their compliance to the requirements of all process' stakeholders. As a result, synergies among operators (manual tasks) and machines (automated tasks) are improved, thus reducing time-losses and increasing productivity.

[1]  Vera Hummel,et al.  Capability-based Task Allocation in Human-robot Collaboration , 2017 .

[2]  Kristina Säfsten,et al.  The content and process of automation strategies , 2007 .

[3]  Harold E. Price,et al.  The Allocation of Functions in Systems , 1985 .

[4]  Toshiyuki Inagaki,et al.  Adaptive Automation: Sharing and Trading of Control , 2001 .

[5]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators , 1978 .

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[8]  Sebastian Steinau,et al.  Automation of Intralogistic Processes through Flexibilisation - A Method for the Flexible Configuration and Evaluation of Systems of Systems , 2018, ICINCO.

[9]  Eric Mayer Design For Success A Human Centered Approach To Designing Successful Products And Systems , 2016 .

[10]  Wolfgang Echelmeyer,et al.  Lean Human-Robot Interaction Design for the Material Supply Process , 2019, ICINCO.

[11]  Wolfgang Echelmeyer,et al.  A Method for the Design of Lean Human-Robot Interaction , 2018, 2018 11th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI).

[12]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .

[13]  A. Abeliansky,et al.  Automation and Demographic Change , 2017 .

[14]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[15]  Wolfgang Echelmeyer,et al.  Towards the full automation of distribution centers , 2015, 2015 4th International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT).

[16]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues , 2002 .

[18]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Allocating functions in human–machine systems. , 1998 .

[19]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[20]  S S Stevens,et al.  HUMAN ENGINEERING FOR AN EFFECTIVE AIR-NAVIGATION AND TRAFFIC-CONTROL SYSTEM, AND APPENDIXES 1 THRU 3 , 1951 .