A Structural Hole-Based Approach to Control Public Opinion

Structural hole spanners play an important role in information diffusion. Compared with opinion leader, structural hole spanners have better location in social network to expand the scope of information diffusion. In the past, researchers focused on the evolution rules and the opinion dynamics environments to monitor public opinion and even manage public opinion to the place they want. In this paper, we propose a novel structural-hole-based approach to control public opinion in social networks (shorten for SHCPO approach). We discuss influences of opinion evolution with ordinary agents and structural hole spanners via using our improving Friedkin-Johnsen (FJ) model. We analysis evolution tendency of public opinion, which is the final consensus of public opinion via FJ model, with ordinary agents in a community and with structural hole spanners in joint communities. We conclude three kinds of connections between structural hole spanners and ordinary agents in joint communities. They are structural hole spanners connecting (1) two opinion leaders; (2) two ordinary agents; (3) one opinion leader and one ordinary agents. The three connections will lead to different conditions for opinion evolution. And then, we remove the connections if public opinion tendencies are negative in joint communities and its end-communities. It prevents public opinion of the community and one of its end-communities. It guides the public opinion tendencies of joint communities going towards positive. The experiment result shows that SHCPO approach has certain extent effects.

[1]  Nuno Crokidakis,et al.  The influence of contrarians in the dynamics of opinion formation , 2017, 1705.10761.

[2]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  Opinion evolution influenced by informed agents , 2016 .

[3]  Cheng-Te Li,et al.  Forecasting participants of information diffusion on social networks with its applications , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[4]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  How Peer Pressure Shapes Consensus, Leadership, and Innovations in Social Groups , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Xiaoliang Chen,et al.  Information propagation model based on hybrid social factors of opportunity, trust and motivation , 2019, Neurocomputing.

[6]  Charalampos E. Tsourakakis,et al.  Minimizing Polarization and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2017, WWW.

[7]  R. Srikant,et al.  Opinion dynamics in social networks: A local interaction game with stubborn agents , 2012, 2013 American Control Conference.

[8]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[9]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Social influence and opinions , 1990 .

[10]  Yizhou Sun,et al.  RAIN: Social Role-Aware Information Diffusion , 2015, AAAI.

[11]  Taher H. Haveliwala Topic-sensitive PageRank , 2002, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[12]  Caiyun Wang,et al.  Soft-control for collective opinion of weighted DeGroot model , 2017, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity.

[13]  Hongning Wang,et al.  When Sentiment Analysis Meets Social Network: A Holistic User Behavior Modeling in Opinionated Data , 2018, KDD.

[14]  Yongbin Liu,et al.  Understanding User Behavior in Sina Weibo Online Social Network: A Community Approach , 2018, IEEE Access.

[15]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[16]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[17]  R. Lambiotte,et al.  Random Walks, Markov Processes and the Multiscale Modular Organization of Complex Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering.

[18]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[19]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Managing consensus based on leadership in opinion dynamics , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[20]  Jie Tang,et al.  Mining structural hole spanners through information diffusion in social networks , 2013, WWW.

[21]  R. Berger A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Reaching a Consensus Using DeGroot's Method , 1981 .

[22]  Gang Kou,et al.  A survey on the fusion process in opinion dynamics , 2018, Inf. Fusion.

[23]  Charalampos E. Tsourakakis,et al.  Opinion Dynamics with Varying Susceptibility to Persuasion , 2018, KDD.

[24]  Weifa Liang,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for the Identification of Top-$k$ Structural Hole Spanners in Large Social Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[25]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[26]  Roberto Tempo,et al.  Novel Multidimensional Models of Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[27]  K. Fu,et al.  Networked framing between source posts and their reposts: an analysis of public opinion on China's microblogs , 2016 .

[28]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Joint Community and Structural Hole Spanner Detection via Harmonic Modularity , 2016, KDD.