Structure of the transition state for folding of the 129 aa protein CheY resembles that of a smaller protein, CI-2.

Backgound. Protein engineering analysis has been used as a tool to determine the structure of the transition state of two different proteins: CI-2 and barnase. CI-2 belongs to the group of small, globular proteins with no disulphide bonds that fold via a two-state mechanism. Barnase is a larger protein (110 aa) and displays a folding intermediate. The structure of the transition state of both proteins is quite different. Whereas in CI-2 no region is fully native and it looks like an expanded form of the folded state, in barnase several regions are folded and the rate-limiting step seems to be the consolidation of the hydrophobic core. On the basis of these results, a unified scheme for the transition state of protein folding has been presented. We decided to characterize the folding pathway, or pathways, present in the alpha/beta parallel family of proteins using one of the smallest members, CheY (129 aa), as a model case. Results. The folding pathway of CheY contains, as does that of barnase, a kinetic intermediate. The picture obtained for CheY from the equilibrium and kinetic analyses of several mutations scattered throughout the whole protein is different from that found for barnase. On the basis of the experimental results and the structure of CheY, the protein can be divided into two subdomains (from beta-strand 1 to beta-strand 3 and from beta-strand 3 to the C terminus). Whereas the structure of the first subdomain in the transition state resembles that found for the CI-2 protein, the second subdomain is compact but unstructured. The packing of the first alpha-helix against beta-strands 1 and 2 seems to be the nucleus around which the rest of the protein folds. Conclusion. Comparison of the transition state of barnase with those of CheY and CI-2 indicates that different proteins have different transition states, probably depending on the energetics and the position of the rate-limiting step in the folding pathway. CheY appears to fold through a nucleation/condensation mechanism as has been found for CI-2. The rate-determining step in some multi-modular proteins could be the formation of a stable domain, with the less stable domains folding after the major rate-determining step.

[1]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[2]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data. , 1989, Analytical biochemistry.

[3]  Andreas Matouschek,et al.  Transient folding intermediates characterized by protein engineering , 1990, Nature.

[4]  A. Fersht,et al.  Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. 2. Influence of proline isomerization on the folding kinetics and thermodynamic characterization of the transition state of folding. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[5]  P. Matsumura,et al.  Crystal structure of Escherichia coli CheY refined at 1.7-A resolution. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[6]  R. L. Baldwin.  Pulsed H/D-exchange studies of folding intermediates , 1993 .

[7]  C. Schutt,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of CheY, the response regulator of bacterial chemotaxis , 1989, Nature.

[8]  L Serrano,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. III. Structure of the transition state for unfolding of barnase analysed by a protein engineering procedure. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  G Vriend,et al.  WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. , 1990, Journal of molecular graphics.

[10]  L. Serrano,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of the chemotactic protein from Escherichia coli, CheY. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[11]  L Serrano,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. VI. The folding pathway of barnase: comparison with theoretical models. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  L Serrano,et al.  Evidence for a two-state transition in the folding process of the activation domain of human procarboxypeptidase A2. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[13]  L Serrano,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. II. Substructure of barnase and the contribution of different interactions to protein stability. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  A. Fersht,et al.  Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. 1. Evidence for a two-state transition. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[15]  A. Fersht,et al.  Single versus parallel pathways of protein folding and fractional formation of structure in the transition state. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  U. Hahn,et al.  A general method for rapid site-directed mutagenesis using the polymerase chain reaction. , 1990, Gene.

[17]  L Serrano,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. IV. Structure of an intermediate in the refolding of barnase analysed by a protein engineering procedure. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  J. Richardson,et al.  Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. , 1988, Science.

[19]  A. Fersht,et al.  Characterizing transition states in protein folding: an essential step in the puzzle. , 1995, Current opinion in structural biology.

[20]  F M Poulsen,et al.  Folding of a four-helix bundle: studies of acyl-coenzyme A binding protein. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[21]  A. Fersht,et al.  Structure of the hydrophobic core in the transition state for folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2: a critical test of the protein engineering method of analysis. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[22]  A. Fersht,et al.  The structure of the transition state for folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 analysed by protein engineering methods: evidence for a nucleation-condensation mechanism for protein folding. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  J. Stock,et al.  Signal transduction in bacteria , 1990, Nature.

[24]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  Specific nucleus as the transition state for protein folding: evidence from the lattice model. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[25]  R. Sauer,et al.  P22 Arc repressor: transition state properties inferred from mutational effects on the rates of protein unfolding and refolding. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[26]  A. Fersht,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  V. Muñoz,et al.  Kinetic characterization of the chemotactic protein from Escherichia coli, CheY. Kinetic analysis of the inverse hydrophobic effect. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[28]  A. Fersht,et al.  Effect of cavity-creating mutations in the hydrophobic core of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[29]  A. Fersht,et al.  Mapping the transition state and pathway of protein folding by protein engineering , 1989, Nature.

[30]  L. Serrano,et al.  Magnesium binding to the bacterial chemotaxis protein CheY results in large conformational changes involving its functional surface. , 1994, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[31]  V L Arcus,et al.  A comparison of the pH, urea, and temperature-denatured states of barnase by heteronuclear NMR: implications for the initiation of protein folding. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  L. Serrano,et al.  1H- and 15N-NMR assignment and solution structure of the chemotactic Escherichia coli Che Y protein. , 1993, European journal of biochemistry.

[33]  B. Matthews,et al.  Energetic cost and structural consequences of burying a hydroxyl group within the core of a protein determined from Ala-->Ser and Val-->Thr substitutions in T4 lysozyme. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[34]  A. Fersht,et al.  Structure of the transition state for the folding/unfolding of the barley chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 and its implications for mechanisms of protein folding. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[36]  M. Marahiel,et al.  Extremely rapid protein folding in the absence of intermediates , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[37]  Luis Serrano,et al.  Empirical correlation for the replacement of Ala by Gly: Importance of amino acid secondary intrinsic propensities , 1995, Proteins.

[38]  P. Alexander,et al.  Kinetic analysis of folding and unfolding the 56 amino acid IgG-binding domain of streptococcal protein G. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[39]  V. Muñoz,et al.  Structural analysis of peptides encompassing all α-helices of three α/β parallel proteins: Che-Y, flavodoxin and P21-Ras: Implications for α-Helix stability and the folding of α/β parallel proteins , 1995 .

[40]  L. Serrano,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of chemotactic Che Y protein in aqueous solution by nuclear magnetic resonance methods. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  Assignments, secondary structure, global fold, and dynamics of chemotaxis Y protein using three- and four-dimensional heteronuclear (13C,15N) NMR spectroscopy. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[42]  A. Fersht,et al.  Exploring the energy surface of protein folding by structure-reactivity relationships and engineered proteins: observation of Hammond behavior for the gross structure of the transition state and anti-Hammond behavior for structural elements for unfolding/folding of barnase. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[43]  L Serrano,et al.  Thermodynamic and kinetic analysis of the SH3 domain of spectrin shows a two-state folding transition. , 1994, Biochemistry.