Co-development of the ENVISAGE-Families programme for parents of children with disabilities: Reflections on a parent-researcher partnership.

INTRODUCTION In childhood disability research, the involvement of families is essential for optimal outcomes for all participants. ENVISAGE (ENabling VISions And Growing Expectations)-Families is a programme comprising five online workshops for parents of children with neurodevelopmental disorders. The workshops aim to introduce parents to strengths-based perspectives on health and development. The research is based on an integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) approach, in which knowledge users are involved throughout the research process. This article is co-authored by the ENVISAGE health service researchers (N = 9) and parent partners (N = 3) to describe the process through which we co-developed and implemented the workshops. METHODS Collaborative auto-ethnography methods, based on a combination of interviews, qualitative surveys, and discussions held to complete the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and Public-2 tool, were used to describe the co-design process, the benefits gained, and lessons learned. FINDINGS Parents (n = 118) were involved in developing and implementing the ENVISAGE workshops across the different phases, as partners, collaborators, or participants. Three parents were involved as investigators throughout. We identify seven key ingredients that we believe are necessary for a successful parent-researcher working relationship: (i) consistent communication; (ii) clear roles and expectations; (iii) onboarding and feedback; (iv) flexibility; (v) understanding; (vi) self-reflection; and (vii) funding. CONCLUSION Patient and family engagement in research is a rapidly growing area of scholarship with new knowledge and tools added every year. As our team embarks on new collaborative studies, we incorporate this knowledge as well as the practical experience we gain from working together.

[1]  J. Ziviani,et al.  Impact of “early intervention” parent workshops on outcomes for caregivers of children with neurodisabilities: a mixed-methods study , 2022, Disability and rehabilitation.

[2]  J. Ziviani,et al.  ENabling VISions and Growing Expectations (ENVISAGE): Parent reviewers' perspectives of a co-designed program to support parents raising a child with an early-onset neurodevelopmental disability. , 2021, Research in developmental disabilities.

[3]  L. Forsythe,et al.  Researchers, patients, and other stakeholders’ perspectives on challenges to and strategies for engagement , 2020, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[4]  M. Ketelaar,et al.  Designing a tool to support patient and public involvement in research projects: the Involvement Matrix , 2020, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[5]  I. Graham,et al.  Building an integrated knowledge translation (IKT) evidence base: colloquium proceedings and research direction , 2020, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[6]  S. Mahant,et al.  Health Outcomes of Parents of Children with Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2019, The Journal of pediatrics.

[7]  S. Scott,et al.  Engaging children and families in pediatric Health Research: a scoping review , 2019, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[8]  N. Modi,et al.  Parent, child and public involvement in child health research: core value not just an optional extra , 2018, Pediatric Research.

[9]  E. Jacobs,et al.  Go Slow to Go Fast: Successful Engagement Strategies for Patient-Centered, Multi-Site Research, Involving Academic and Community-Based Organizations , 2018, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[10]  D. G. Altman,et al.  GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research , 2017, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[11]  J. Lapadat Ethics in Autoethnography and Collaborative Autoethnography , 2017 .

[12]  A. McPherson,et al.  How and why should we engage parents as co‐researchers in health research? A scoping review of current practices , 2016, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[13]  K Boddy,et al.  Involving disabled children and young people as partners in research: a systematic review. , 2015, Child: care, health and development.

[14]  S. Mayhew,et al.  When can research from one setting be useful in another? Understanding perceptions of the applicability and transferability of research. , 2013, Health promotion international.

[15]  C. Morris,et al.  Why it is crucial to involve families in all stages of childhood disability research , 2011, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[16]  Ronald J. Pelias,et al.  A Collaborative Autoethnography , 2013 .