Common world model for unmanned systems

The Robotic Collaborative Technology Alliance (RCTA) seeks to provide adaptive robot capabilities which move beyond traditional metric algorithms to include cognitive capabilities. Key to this effort is the Common World Model, which moves beyond the state-of-the-art by representing the world using metric, semantic, and symbolic information. It joins these layers of information to define objects in the world. These objects may be reasoned upon jointly using traditional geometric, symbolic cognitive algorithms and new computational nodes formed by the combination of these disciplines. The Common World Model must understand how these objects relate to each other. Our world model includes the concept of Self-Information about the robot. By encoding current capability, component status, task execution state, and histories we track information which enables the robot to reason and adapt its performance using Meta-Cognition and Machine Learning principles. The world model includes models of how aspects of the environment behave, which enable prediction of future world states. To manage complexity, we adopted a phased implementation approach to the world model. We discuss the design of “Phase 1” of this world model, and interfaces by tracing perception data through the system from the source to the meta-cognitive layers provided by ACT-R and SS-RICS. We close with lessons learned from implementation and how the design relates to Open Architecture.

[1]  Maxim Likhachev,et al.  Search-Based Planning with Provable Suboptimality Bounds for Continuous State Spaces , 2011, SOCS.

[2]  Daniel D. Lee,et al.  The University of Pennsylvania MAGIC 2010 multi‐robot unmanned vehicle system , 2012, J. Field Robotics.

[3]  D. Reitter,et al.  Resistance is Futile: Winning Lemonade Market Share through Metacognitive Reasoning in a Three-Agent Cooperative Game , 2010 .

[4]  Lyle N. Long,et al.  Deep Blue Cannot Play Checkers: The Need for Generalized Intelligence for Mobile Robots , 2010, J. Robotics.

[5]  Moritz Tenorth,et al.  KNOWROB — knowledge processing for autonomous personal robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  Andrew Birrell,et al.  Implementing Remote procedure calls , 1983, SOSP '83.

[7]  Barry A. Bodt,et al.  Assessing unmanned ground vehicle tactical behaviors performance , 2010, PerMIS.

[8]  Christian Lebiere,et al.  Unsurpervised Learning in Hybrid Cognitive Architectures , 2012 .

[9]  A L Rankin,et al.  Daytime Mud Detection for Unmanned Ground Vehicle Autonomous Navigation , 2008 .

[10]  Yury Vinokurov,et al.  A Metacognitive Classifier Using a Hybrid ACT-R/Leabra Architecture , 2011, Lifelong Learning.

[11]  Moritz Tenorth,et al.  KNOWROB-MAP - knowledge-linked semantic object maps , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[12]  Martial Hebert,et al.  An architecture for online semantic labeling on UGVs , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[13]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Alberto Lacaze,et al.  Unmanned Ground Vehicle Two-Level Planning Technology Assessment , 2010 .

[15]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Using Expectations to Drive Cognitive Behavior , 2012, AAAI.

[16]  John R. Anderson,et al.  ACT-R: A Theory of Higher Level Cognition and Its Relation to Visual Attention , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Troy D. Kelley,et al.  A cognitive robotics system: the symbolic and sub-symbolic robotic intelligence control system (SS-RICS) , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.