How Certain Physical Considerations Impact Aerostructural Wing Optimization

Wing design optimization has been studied extensively and is of continued interest as optimization tools are developed and become more accessible. In each of these studies, certain assumptions and simplifications are made to make the design problem tractable. However, it is difficult to find systematic studies in which several considerations are added or removed one at a time to study how much impact they have. In this work, we examine how certain physical considerations (viscous drag, wave drag, thrust loads, and inertial relief from structural, fuel, and engine masses), impact the aerostructural optimization results for three distinct aircraft wings. The goal is to help develop a rough idea of how important these physical considerations are. We do this using gradient-based optimization and a multidisciplinary design optimization framework, OpenMDAO. We use the open-source tool OpenAeroStruct that couples a vortex lattice method to a finite element method. We establish a baseline aerostructural design optimization problem then perform a series of optimizations, each with one physical consideration removed from the baseline case. We find that depending on the size of the aircraft and flight conditions, the importance of some of these physical considerations varies considerably whereas the importance of others do not. Specifically, the optimal designs change radically without proper viscous and wave drag considerations and smaller aircraft with more distributed propulsion are more affected by the inclusion of engine loads.

[1]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Low-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization of Aircraft Wings with a Simplified Wingbox Model Using OpenAeroStruct , 2018, EngOpt 2018 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering Optimization.

[2]  C. Mader,et al.  Modeling Boundary Layer Ingestion Using a Coupled Aeropropulsive Analysis , 2018 .

[3]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  OpenMDAO: an open-source framework for multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization , 2019, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[4]  Raymond M. Kolonay,et al.  Service ORiented Computing EnviRonment (SORCER) for Large Scale, Distributed, Dynamic Fidelity Aeroelastic Analysis & Optimization , 2010 .

[5]  Brian J. German,et al.  A surrogate-based multi-disciplinary design optimization framework modeling wing–propeller interaction , 2018, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[6]  Mark Drela,et al.  Development of the D8 Transport Configuration , 2011 .

[7]  Robert D. Falck,et al.  Simultaneous Propulsion System and Trajectory Optimization , 2017 .

[8]  Michel van Tooren,et al.  Coupled adjoint aerostructural wing optimization using quasi-three-dimensional aerodynamic analysis , 2016 .

[9]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A Computational Architecture for Coupling Heterogeneous Numerical Models and Computing Coupled Derivatives , 2018, ACM Trans. Math. Softw..

[10]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multifidelity optimization under uncertainty for a tailless aircraft , 2018 .

[11]  Eric Ting,et al.  Optimization of Variable-Camber Continuous Trailing-Edge Flap Configuration for Drag Reduction , 2018, Journal of Aircraft.

[12]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes , 2012, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[13]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[14]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A parallel aerostructural optimization framework for aircraft design studies , 2014 .

[15]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Development of a Common Research Model for Applied CFD Validation Studies , 2008 .

[16]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  pyOpt: a Python-based object-oriented framework for nonlinear constrained optimization , 2011, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[17]  Gerald Kress,et al.  Mass estimation of transport aircraft wingbox structures with a CAD/CAE-based multidisciplinary process , 2011 .

[18]  John T. Hwang,et al.  Large-Scale Multidisciplinary Optimization of an Electric Aircraft for On-Demand Mobility , 2018 .

[19]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  An automated selection algorithm for nonlinear solvers in MDO , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[20]  Andrew Ning,et al.  Integrated Design of Downwind Land-based Wind Turbines using Analytic Gradients , 2016 .

[21]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[22]  Timothy R. Brooks,et al.  Benchmark Aerostructural Models for the Study of Transonic Aircraft Wings , 2018, AIAA Journal.

[23]  C. Farhat,et al.  Coupled Analytical Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Aeroelastic Systems , 2001 .

[24]  Sharon L. Padula,et al.  Multidisciplinary Environments: A History of Engineering Framework Development , 2006 .

[25]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  The complex-step derivative approximation , 2003, TOMS.

[26]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Design and Trajectory Optimization of a Morphing Wing Aircraft , 2018 .

[27]  Philip S. Beran,et al.  Spiral: A General Framework For Parameter Sensitivity Analysis , 2017 .

[28]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Multi-point Aero-Structural Optimization of Wings Including Planform Variations , 2007 .

[29]  Luciano Demasi,et al.  Vortex Lattice Method Coupled with Advanced One-Dimensional Structural Models , 2011 .

[30]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multipoint Variable Cycle Engine Design Using Gradient-Based Optimization , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[31]  Wayne Johnson,et al.  Concept Vehicles for VTOL Air Taxi Operations , 2018 .

[32]  J. C. Townsend,et al.  Framework Requirements for MDO Application Development , 1998 .

[33]  Timothy R. Brooks,et al.  Undeflected common research model (uCRM): An aerostructural model for the study of high aspect ratio transport aircraft wings , 2017 .

[34]  Brett Malone,et al.  Multidisciplinary optimization in aircraft design using analytic technology models , 1991 .

[35]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multimodality in aerodynamic wing design optimization , 2017 .

[36]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Coupled aeropropulsive design optimisation of a boundary-layer ingestion propulsor , 2018, The Aeronautical Journal.

[37]  Graeme J. Kennedy,et al.  Scalable Parallel Approach for High-Fidelity Steady-State Aeroelastic Analysis and Adjoint Derivative Computations , 2014 .

[38]  Andrew Ning,et al.  Coupled wind turbine design and layout optimization with nonhomogeneous wind turbines , 2019, Wind Energy Science.

[39]  Robert D. Falck,et al.  Trajectory Optimization of Electric Aircraft Subject to Subsystem Thermal Constraints , 2017 .

[40]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Open-source coupled aerostructural optimization using Python , 2018 .

[41]  P. M. Fischer,et al.  Open source software framework for applications in aeronautics and space , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[42]  Mark Drela,et al.  Method for Simultaneous Wing Aerodynamic and Structural Load Prediction , 1989 .