Parafoveal processing efficiency in rapid automatized naming: a comparison between Chinese normal and dyslexic children.

Dyslexic children are known to be slower than normal readers in rapid automatized naming (RAN). This suggests that dyslexics encounter local processing difficulties, which presumably induce a narrower perceptual span. Consequently, dyslexics should suffer less than normal readers from removing parafoveal preview. Here we used a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm in a RAN task to experimentally test this prediction. Results indicate that dyslexics extract less parafoveal information than control children. We propose that more attentional resources are recruited to the foveal processing because of dyslexics' less automatized translation of visual symbols into phonological output, thereby causing a reduction of the perceptual span. This in turn leads to less efficient preactivation of parafoveal information and, hence, more difficulty in processing the next foveal item.

[1]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  T. Nazir,et al.  Developing normal reading skills: aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  Jessica A. R. Logan,et al.  Rapid serial naming and reading ability: the role of lexical access , 2011, Reading and writing.

[4]  A W Inhoff,et al.  Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Hazel I. Blythe,et al.  Children’s eye movements during reading , 2011 .

[6]  Ping Li,et al.  Universality of categorical perception deficit in developmental dyslexia: an investigation of Mandarin Chinese tones. , 2012, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[7]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Development of the letter identity span in reading: evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  See Dick RAN: Rapid Naming and the Longitudinal Prediction of Reading Subskills in First and Second Graders , 1999 .

[9]  Catherine McBride-Chang,et al.  Understanding Chinese Developmental Dyslexia: Morphological Awareness as a Core Cognitive Construct. , 2006 .

[10]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  A. Inhoff,et al.  The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  The Relationship Between Phoneme Awareness and Rapid Serial Naming Skills and Literacy Acquisition: The Role of Developmental Period and Reading Ability , 2004 .

[13]  G. Pavlidis,et al.  Do eye movements hold the key to dyslexia? , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers , 1981, Brain and Language.

[15]  G. Stanley,et al.  Eye-movements and sequential tracking in dyslexic and control children. , 1983, British journal of psychology.

[16]  H. Branigan,et al.  Dyslexia and fluency: parafoveal and foveal influences on rapid automatized naming. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  M. Wolf,et al.  The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. , 1999 .

[18]  J. Bowey,et al.  On the association between serial naming speed for letters and digits and word‐reading skill: towards a developmental account , 2005 .

[19]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Selective attentional dyslexia , 1989 .

[20]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose , 1984 .

[21]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Impaired visual processing of multi-element arrays is associated with increased number of eye movements in dyslexic reading , 2005, Vision Research.

[22]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Covert Attention and Eye Movements during Reading , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  M. L. Kelly,et al.  Dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency: Rapid automatized naming and the importance of continuous lists , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  R. Walker,et al.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  M. L. Kelly,et al.  Elucidating the component processes involved in dyslexic and non-dyslexic reading fluency: An eye-tracking study , 2008, Cognition.

[26]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Rapid processing of letters, digits and symbols: what purely visual-attentional deficit in developmental dyslexia? , 2009, Developmental science.

[27]  G. McConkie,et al.  What guides a reader's eye movements? , 1976, Vision Research.

[28]  K Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. , 1986, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[29]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Perhaps correlational but not causal: No effect of dyslexic readers’ magnocellular system on their eye movements during reading , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Jessica A. R. Logan The role of parafoveal information in rapid letter naming , 2009 .

[31]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[32]  M. Denckla,et al.  Rapid ‘automatized’ naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities , 1976, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Ming Yan,et al.  Eye-voice span during rapid automatized naming of digits and dice in Chinese normal and dyslexic children. , 2013, Developmental science.

[34]  R Kliegl,et al.  Dyslexic and normal readers' eye movements. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  K. Rayner,et al.  Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements , 2006 .

[36]  M. Wolf,et al.  Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[37]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[38]  Rauno Parrila,et al.  Naming Speed and Phonological Awareness as Predictors of Reading Development. , 2003 .

[39]  H. Wimmer,et al.  A dual-route perspective on eye movements of dyslexic readers , 2010, Cognition.

[40]  K. Rayner The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.