Comparative study of engine control strategies for particulate emissions from direct injection light-duty vehicle fueled with gasoline and liquid phase liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)

To evaluate the potential of a dedicated direct injection liquefied petroleum gas (LPG-DI) vehicle, we investigated several engine control parameters that are closely related to the characteristics of mixture preparation and nano-particle emissions. The fuel supply circuit for the direct injection of LPG in liquid form was modified into a return-type system comprised of a three-way high pressure pump, a low pressure regulator, a brushless direct current (BLDC) pump, and an LPG tank. Particulate number (PN) and size distribution measurements were performed in FTP-75 and HWFET modes, and also using an engine test bench. The experimental results showed that significant PN emissions were produced during the cold start and the transient warm-up operations of the gasoline direct injection (GDI) vehicle; this production of particle emissions was due to application of split injection and catalyst heating function. A bimodal particle size of 10 < dp < 100 nm was formed in the GDI vehicle, whereas a sub 30 nm nuclei mode was mainly formed in the LPG-DI vehicle. Excessive particle formation during sudden acceleration of the GDI vehicle in the HWFET mode was improved with LPG fuel. The reduction rate of the PN concentration with LPG application reached approximately 98% (FTP-75 mode) and 99% (HWFET mode) compared to the GDI vehicle. The total PN concentration in the LPG-DI vehicle was significantly improved to 1.6 × 1010 (N/km) for the FTP-75 mode and 3.4 × 109 (N/km) for the HWFET mode.

[1]  Tetsuya Yamashita,et al.  Nano Particle Emission Evaluation of State of the Art Diesel Aftertreatment Technologies (DPF, urea-SCR and DOC), Gasoline Combustion Systems (Lean Burn / Stoichiometric DISI and MPI) and Fuel Qualities Effects (EtOH, ETBE, FAME, Aromatics and Distillation) , 2007 .

[2]  Junho Cho,et al.  Combustion and Emission Characteristics in a Direct Injection LPG/Gasoline Spark Ignition Engine , 2010 .

[3]  E. R. Jayaratne,et al.  Particle and carbon dioxide emissions from passenger vehicles operating on unleaded petrol and LPG fuel. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Peter Eastwood,et al.  Particulate Emissions from Vehicles , 2008 .

[6]  C. Bae,et al.  The potential of di-methyl ether (DME) as an alternative fuel for compression-ignition engines: A review , 2008 .

[7]  David L. Harrington,et al.  Automotive Spark-Ignited Direct-Injection Gasoline Engines , 2000 .

[8]  Bernd Fusshoeller,et al.  Strategies Towards Meeting Future Particulate Matter Emission Requirements in Homogeneous Gasoline Direct Injection Engines , 2011 .

[9]  D. Kittelson Engines and nanoparticles: a review , 1998 .

[10]  Timothy V. Johnson,et al.  Review of diesel emissions and control , 2009 .

[11]  Jyrki Ristimäki,et al.  Cold temperature PM emissions measurement: method evaluation and application to light duty vehicles. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Simsoo Park,et al.  Experimental investigation on the time resolved THC emission characteristics of liquid phase LPG injection (LPLi) engine during cold start , 2007 .

[13]  Effect of LPG Injection Methods on Engine Performance , 2010 .

[14]  Bruce Campbell,et al.  Study of Particle Number Emissions from a Turbocharged Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) Engine Including Data from a Fast-Response Particle Size Spectrometer , 2011 .

[15]  Guohong Tian,et al.  Dual-injection: The flexible, bi-fuel concept for spark-ignition engines fuelled with various gasoline and biofuel blends , 2011 .

[16]  Kihyung Lee,et al.  An experimental study on the spray behavior and fuel distribution of GDI injectors using the entropy analysis and PIV method , 2004 .

[17]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  GASOLINE VEHICLE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS: COMPARISON OF STEADY STATE, FTP, AND US06 MEASUREMENTS , 1999 .

[18]  J. Heywood,et al.  Trends in Performance Characteristics of Modern Automobile SI and Diesel Engines , 2009 .

[19]  T. Johnson,et al.  Diesel Emissions in Review , 2011 .

[20]  Daniel Sabathil,et al.  The Influence of DISI Engine Operating Parameters on Particle Number Emissions , 2011 .

[21]  Tony Collier,et al.  Particulate Matter and Hydrocarbon Emissions Measurements: Comparing First and Second Generation DISI with PFI in Single Cylinder Optical Engines , 2006 .

[22]  Paul Kapus,et al.  Reduction of particulate number emissions through calibration methods , 2010 .

[23]  C. Myung,et al.  Effects of gasoline, diesel, LPG, and low-carbon fuels and various certification modes on nanoparticle emission characteristics in light-duty vehicles , 2009 .

[24]  Matthias Kratzsch,et al.  Reducing particulate emissions , 2010 .

[25]  Changming Gong,et al.  Catalyst light-off behavior of a spark-ignition LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) engine during cold sta , 2011 .

[26]  Liguang Li,et al.  Cold start characteristics at low temperatures based on the first firing cycle in an LPG engine , 2007 .

[27]  Bruce Campbell,et al.  Analysis of Transient HC, CO, NOx and CO2 Emissions from a GDI Engine using Fast Response Gas Analyzers , 2011 .