Industry Dynamics and the Distiribution of Firm Sizes: A Non-Parametric Apporoach

The aim of this paper is to analyze the evolution of the size distribution of young firms within some selected industries, trying to assess the empirical implications of different models of industry dynamics: the model of passive learning (Jovanovic 1982), the model of active learning (Ericson and Pakes, 1995), and the evolutionary model (Audretsch, 1995). We use a non-parametric technique, the Kernel density estimator, applied to a data set from the Italian National Institute for Social Security (INPS), consisting in 12 cohorts of new manufacturing firms followed for 6 years. Since the patterns of convergence to the limit distribution are different between industries, we conclude that the model of passive learning is consistent with some of them, the active exploration model with others, the evolutionary model with all of them.

[1]  J. Mata,et al.  BOX-COX QUANTILE REGRESSION AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF FIRM SIZES , 2000 .

[2]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Entry, exit, and shakeouts in the United States in new manufactured products , 1995 .

[3]  Gibrat, Galton and Job Generation , 1999 .

[4]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Interpretations of Departures from the Pareto Curve Firm-Size Distributions , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Paul Geroski,et al.  The Growth of Firms in Theory and in Practice , 2000 .

[6]  Sergey V. Buldyrev,et al.  Scaling behavior in economics: I Epirical results for company growth , 1997, cond-mat/9702082.

[7]  Luís M. B. Cabral,et al.  On the Evolution of the Firm Size Distribution: Facts and Theory , 2001 .

[8]  A. Pakes,et al.  Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work , 1995 .

[9]  A. Pakes,et al.  Empirical Implications of Alternative Models of Firm Dynamics , 1989 .

[10]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Innovation and Industry Evolution , 1985 .

[11]  Francesca Lotti,et al.  The relationship between size and growth: the case of Italian newborn firms , 2001 .

[12]  J. Mata.  Firm growth during infancy , 1994 .

[13]  Enrico Santarelli,et al.  Start-up size and industrial dynamics: some evidence from Italian manufacturing , 1999 .

[14]  H. A. Simon,et al.  Skew Distributions and the Size of Business Firms , 1977 .

[15]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Evolution of New Industries and the Determinants of Market Structure , 1990 .

[16]  William A. Brock,et al.  Scaling in Economics: A Reader's Guide , 1999 .

[17]  L. Bellmann,et al.  Post-entry behaviour and the cycle: Evidence from Germany , 1995 .

[18]  Francesca Lotti,et al.  Does Gibrat’s Law Hold in the Case of Young, Small Firms? , 1999 .

[19]  P. Geroski.  What do we know about entry , 1995 .

[20]  Peter Pashigian,et al.  Firm Size and Rate of Growth , 1962, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Boyan Jovanovic.  Selection and the evolution of industry , 1981 .