Application in the Dairy Industry and Implications for Systems Analysis

Background, Aims and Scope. Allocation is required when quantifying environmental impacts of individual products from multi-product manufacturing plants. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) recommends in ISO 14041 that allocation should reflect underlying physical relationships between inputs and outputs, or in the absence of such knowledge, allocation should reflect other relationships (e.g. economic value). Economic allocation is generally recommended if process specific information on the manufacturing process is lacking. In this paper, a physico-chemical allocation matrix, based on industry-specific data from the dairy industry, is developed and discussed as an alternative allocation method. Methods. Operational data from 17 dairy manufacturing plants was used to develop an industry specific physico-chemical allocation matrix. Through an extensive process of substraction/substitution, it is possible to determine average resource use (e.g. electricity, thermal energy, water, etc) and wastewater emissions for individual dairy products within multi-product manufacturing plants. The average operational data for individual products were normalised to maintain industry confidentiality and then used as an industry specific allocation matrix. The quantity of raw milk required per product is based on the milk solids basis to account for dairy 'by-products' that would otherwise be neglected. Results and Discussion. Applying fixed type allocation methods (e.g. economic) for all input and outputs based on the quantity of product introduces order of magnitude sized deviations from physico-chemical allocation in some cases. The error associated with the quality of the whole of factory plant data or truncation error associated with setting system boundaries is insignificant in comparison. The profound effects of the results on systems analysis are discussed. The results raise concerns about using economic allocation as a default when allocating intra-industry sectoral flows (i.e. mass and process energy) in the absence of detailed technical information. It is recommended that economic allocation is better suited as a default for reflecting inter-industry sectoral flows. Conclusion. The study highlights the importance of accurate causal allocation procedures that reflect industry-specific production methods. Generation of industry-specific allocation matrices is possible through a process of substitution/subtraction and optimisation. Allocation using such matrices overcomes the inherit bias of mass, process energy or price allocations for a multi-product manufacturing plant and gives a more realistic indication of resource use or emissions per product. The approach appears to be advantageous for resource use or emissions allocation if data is only available on a whole of factory basis for several plants with a similar level of technology.

[1]  Mathias Borg,et al.  Proposal of a method for allocation in building-related environmental LCA based on economic parameters , 2001 .

[2]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review , 2001 .

[3]  Michael Wang,et al.  Allocation of energy use in petroleum refineries to petroleum products , 2004 .

[4]  Ramesh Chandan Dairy-Based Ingredients , 1997 .

[5]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Economic allocation: Examples and derived decision tree , 2004 .

[6]  Frank Werner,et al.  Allocation in LCA of wood-based products experiences of cost action E9 , 2002 .

[7]  C. Cederberg,et al.  Life cycle assessment of milk production — a comparison of conventional and organic farming , 2000 .

[8]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Allocation of environmental burdens in co-product systems: Process and product-related burdens (Part 2) , 1999 .

[9]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Allocation of environmental burdens in co-product systems: Product-related burdens (Part 1) , 1999 .

[10]  B. Weidema Market information in life cycle assessment , 2003 .

[11]  G. C. Cox,et al.  Comparative energy efficiencies of the dairy manufacturing and processing industry: Australia and New Zealand , 1986 .

[12]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  A special view on the nature of the allocation problem , 1998 .

[13]  G. Treloar Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input–Output Tables: Towards an Input–Output-based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method , 1997 .

[14]  Michael R. Overcash,et al.  Allocation procedure in multi-output process: an illustration of ISO 14041 , 2000 .

[15]  Christel Cederberg,et al.  System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production , 2003 .

[16]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories , 2000 .

[17]  Seungdo Kim,et al.  Allocation procedure in ethanol production system from corn grain i. system expansion , 2002 .

[18]  Merete Høgaas Eide,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of industrial milk production , 2002 .

[19]  A. Hospido,et al.  Simplified life cycle assessment of galician milk production , 2003 .

[20]  Erik Dietzenbacher,et al.  The Determinants of Structural Change in the European Union: A New Application of RAS , 2000 .

[21]  Frank Werner,et al.  Economic Allocation in LCA: A Case Study About Aluminium Window Frames , 2000 .

[22]  R. Frischknecht Allocation in Life Cycle Inventory Analysis for Joint Production , 2000 .

[23]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[24]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis , 1998 .

[26]  Ashok Parikh,et al.  Forecasts of Input-Output Matrices Using the R.A.S. Method , 1979 .

[27]  Joost G. Vogtländer,et al.  Allocation in recycling systems , 2001 .

[28]  J. Berlin Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of Swedish semi-hard cheese , 2002 .

[29]  Frank Werner,et al.  Allocation in lca of wood-based products experiences of cost action E9 part i. methodology , 2002 .