Is the future of meat palatable? Perceptions of in vitro meat as evidenced by online news comments

Abstract Objective To understand current public perceptions of in vitro meat (IVM) in light of its potential to be a more environmentally sustainable alternative to conventional meat. Design A qualitative content analysis of the comments made on online news articles highlighting the development of IVM and the world’s first IVM hamburger in August 2013. Setting News article comment sections across seven US-based online news sources (The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Cable News Network and National Public Radio). Subjects Four hundred and sixty-two commenters who made eight hundred and fourteen publicly available online comments addressing IVM. Results Key themes in commenter perceptions of IVM included environmental and public health benefits, but also negative themes such as IVM’s status as an unnatural and unappealing food. Overall, the tone of comments was more negative than positive. Conclusions Findings suggest that while the environmental and public health motivations for developing and in turn consuming IVM resonate with some segments of the population, others find that reasoning both uncompelling and problematic. Concerns about IVM as an unnatural and risky product also appear to be a significant barrier to public acceptance of IVM. Supporters of IVM may wish to begin to develop a regulatory strategy for IVM to build public trust and explore messaging strategies that cast IVM as a new technology with benefits to individuals rather than primarily a solution to global challenges. Those in the public health nutrition field can make an important contribution to the emerging public discussion about IVM.

[1]  J. M. Hodgen,et al.  A fresh look at meat flavor. , 2007, Meat science.

[2]  A. Wolk,et al.  Processed and Unprocessed Red Meat Consumption and Risk of Heart Failure: Prospective Study of Men , 2014, Circulation. Heart failure.

[3]  S. Welin.  Introducing the new meat. Problems and prospects , 2013 .

[4]  P. Hopkins,et al.  Vegetarian Meat: Could Technology Save Animals and Satisfy Meat Eaters? , 2008 .

[5]  A. Yngve,et al.  Climate change: time to redefine our profession , 2010, Public Health Nutrition.

[6]  J. Loke.  Readers' Debate a Local Murder Trial: “Race” in the Online Public Sphere , 2013 .

[7]  Monique M. Raats,et al.  Strategies for dismissing dietary risks: insights from user-generated comments online , 2014 .

[8]  C. Driessen,et al.  Emerging Profiles for Cultured Meat; Ethics through and as Design , 2013, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[9]  W. Willett,et al.  Dietary protein sources in early adulthood and breast cancer incidence: prospective cohort study , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  ‘Their two cents worth’: Exploring user agency in readers’ comments in online news media , 2012 .

[12]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  The "Nasty Effect: " Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Consumer responses to ecolabels , 2010 .

[14]  J. Deckers,et al.  Are Scientists Right and Non-Scientists Wrong? Reflections on Discussions of GM , 2005 .

[15]  A. Corner,et al.  Exploring early public responses to geoengineering , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  M. Betti,et al.  Possibilities for an in vitro meat production system , 2010 .

[17]  G. Rowe,et al.  Initial UK public reaction to avian influenza: Analysis of opinions posted on the BBC website , 2008 .

[18]  C. Shoulders,et al.  The future of meat: a qualitative analysis of cultured meat media coverage. , 2013, Meat science.

[19]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Tackling climate change through livestock : a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities , 2013 .

[21]  J. Spence,et al.  Qualitative content analysis of online news media coverage of weight loss surgery and related reader comments , 2012, Clinical obesity.

[22]  Michael Karlsson.  Participatory Journalism and Crisis Communications: A Swedish Case Study of Swine Flu Coverage , 2010 .

[23]  R. Chiles.  If they come, we will build it: in vitro meat and the discursive struggle over future agrofood expectations , 2013, Agriculture and Human Values.

[24]  Carolyn S. Mattick,et al.  Cultured meat: The systemic implications of an emerging technology , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST).

[25]  G. Rowe,et al.  Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies. , 2011 .

[26]  D. Brossard.  New media landscapes and the science information consumer , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Danny Paskin.  Say what? , 2010 .

[28]  M. Post.  Cultured meat from stem cells: challenges and prospects. , 2012, Meat science.

[29]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[30]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[31]  R. Lau,et al.  Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  N. Stephens.  In vitro meat: Zombies on the menu? , 2010 .

[33]  N. Brossoie,et al.  Making sense of intimate partner violence in late life: comments from online news readers. , 2012, The Gerontologist.

[34]  Natalie Henrich,et al.  What the Public Was Saying about the H1N1 Vaccine: Perceptions and Issues Discussed in On-Line Comments during the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic , 2011, PloS one.

[35]  Rachel Schurman,et al.  Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry Opportunity Structures and the Efficacy of the Anti-Biotech Movement in Western Europe , 2004 .

[36]  A. Corner,et al.  Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK , 2013 .

[37]  Beate Seibt,et al.  Analogies, metaphors, and wondering about the future: Lay sense-making around synthetic meat , 2015, Public understanding of science.

[38]  Harmen Oppewal,et al.  A new medium for data collection: online news discussions , 2003 .