Digital Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry: Craniofacial Applications to Facial Growth, Orthognathic and Reconstructive Surgery, and Morphometrics

Three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging systems have been extensively used in the past three decades by orthodontists and maxillofacial surgeons. The principal advantages of these devices are their quick image acquisition time, non-invasiveness and ease of application, which make them particularly suitable for children and patients with disabilities. In addition, they have been validated against anthropometry for precision, accuracy, bias and reproducibility. The generated models are easy to store and manipulate, making them a unique tool for diagnosis, treatment planning, surgical evaluation and longitudinal studies. Three-dimensional photogrammetry has multiple applications: The creation of average faces has been described and allows age, gender and racial comparison. Monitoring and quantitation of post-surgical changes in reconstructive surgery and orthognathic interventions is also possible using surface imaging. Moreover, it is a powerful morphometrics method used to identify phenotypic markers associated with genetic risk for a particular condition such as non-syndromic cleft lip and palate. Finally, a virtual face can be created by combining surface imaging with cone beam computed tomography.

[1]  V F Ferrario,et al.  Soft tissue facial growth and development as assessed by the three-dimensional computerized mesh diagram analysis. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  Chung How Kau,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology surface changes in untreated children from 12 to 14 years of age. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  S. Richmond,et al.  Facial templates: a new perspective in three dimensions. , 2006, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[4]  J. P. Moss,et al.  Three-dimensional facial growth studied by optical surface scanning. , 2000, Journal of orthodontics.

[5]  S. Weinberg,et al.  Face shape of unaffected parents with cleft affected offspring: combining three-dimensional surface imaging and geometric morphometrics. , 2009, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[6]  Sybill Naidoo,et al.  Anthropometric Precision and Accuracy of Digital Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry: Comparing the Genex and 3dMD Imaging Systems with One Another and with Direct Anthropometry , 2006, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  Pravin K. Patel,et al.  Three-Dimensional Facial Surface Analysis of Patients With Skeletal Malocclusion , 2009, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[8]  Mary L Marazita,et al.  Three‐dimensional morphometric analysis of craniofacial shape in the unaffected relatives of individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts: A possible marker for genetic susceptibility , 2008, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[9]  C. Kau,et al.  Three-dimensional comparison of facial morphology in white populations in Budapest, Hungary, and Houston, Texas. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  Kristina Aldridge,et al.  Precision and error of three‐dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images , 2005, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[11]  C. Kau,et al.  Facial morphologies of an adult Egyptian population and an adult Houstonian white population compared using 3D imaging. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  C. A. Hood,et al.  Validation of a Vision-Based, Three-Dimensional Facial Imaging System , 2003, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[13]  B. Maher,et al.  Parental craniofacial morphology in cleft lip with or without cleft palate as determined by cephalometry: a meta-analysis. , 2006, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[14]  L. Farkas Anthropometry of the head and face , 1994 .

[15]  Randy K. Ellis,et al.  Retrospective cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of temporary anchorage devices. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  Mohammad Y Hajeer,et al.  Three-dimensional assessment of facial soft-tissue asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery. , 2004, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[17]  Chung How Kau,et al.  The 3-dimensional construction of the average 11-year-old child face: a clinical evaluation and application. , 2006, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[18]  S. Richmond,et al.  Three‐dimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery , 2007, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[19]  Chung How Kau,et al.  Facial morphology of Slovenian and Welsh white populations using 3-dimensional imaging. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[20]  E Guest,et al.  Novel methods for quantifying soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. , 2001, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[21]  Chung How Kau,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Postoperative Swelling following Orthognathic Surgery at 6 Months , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  W R Fright,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis techniques--Part 2: Laser scanning: a quantitative three-dimensional soft-tissue analysis using a color-coding system. , 1997, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[23]  T. Goto,et al.  A 3-dimensional method for analyzing facial soft-tissue morphology of patients with jaw deformities. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[24]  V F Ferrario,et al.  Soft-tissue facial morphometry from 6 years to adulthood: a three-dimensional growth study using a new modeling. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[25]  A. Ayoub,et al.  Methods of Assessment of Cleft-Related Facial Deformity: A Review , 2005, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[26]  R Bibb,et al.  The investigation of the changing facial appearance of identical twins employing a three-dimensional laser imaging system. , 2005, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[27]  S. Bishara,et al.  Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial parameters between Egyptian and North American adolescents. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[28]  Gary F. Rogers,et al.  Validity and Reliability of Craniofacial Anthropometric Measurement of 3D Digital Photogrammetric Images , 2008, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[29]  S. Weinberg,et al.  Three-dimensional surface imaging: limitations and considerations from the anthropometric perspective. , 2005, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[30]  Christopher Lane,et al.  Completing the 3-dimensional picture. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[31]  S. Richmond,et al.  Use of 3-dimensional surface acquisition to study facial morphology in 5 populations. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.