Towards a relational approach to design process

This research aims to develop an approach to technology design that will support relational nature of human agency, i.e. the human capacity for action. Supporting relationality requires a different approach from the ways in which we have hitherto performed design practice. Rather than trying to control, predict or prescribe actions and relations of users, designers may design for actions more emergent and relations more fluid. In this paper, we suggest six qualities to characterize a more relational design approach referred to as Agency Sensitive Design (ASD): relationality, visibility, multiplicity, accountability, duality and configurability. We demonstrate how recent design cases and approaches in the broad field of interaction design deal with the relational character of human agency. We conclude with some possible ways of employing ASD qualities in the field of architecture. Although our study focuses on design cases drawn from interaction design field mostly, we nonetheless see broader relevance to other design domains. Conference theme: Computer Science

[1]  Shiv Visvanathan,et al.  Knowledge, justice and democracy. , 2005 .

[2]  Pirjo Elovaara,et al.  Carthographic mappings: participative methods , 2010, PDC '10.

[3]  L. Suchman Agencies in Technology Design: Feminist Reconfigurations* , 2020, Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics.

[4]  Mike Michael,et al.  On Making Data Social: Heterogeneity in Sociological Practice , 2004 .

[5]  Isabelle Doucet,et al.  Agency in Architecture , 2009 .

[6]  Karen Barad Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[7]  A. Bruni,et al.  Reassembling the Social—An Introduction to Actor Network Theory , 2007 .

[8]  Toru Iiyoshi,et al.  Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge , 2008 .

[9]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Socio-Theoretic Accounts of IS: The Problem of Agency , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  S. Guy,et al.  Understanding Architecture, Accounting Society , 2008 .

[11]  Albena Yaneva,et al.  How Buildings 'Surprise': The Renovation of the Alte Aula in Vienna , 2008 .

[12]  N. K. Hayles Desiring Agency: Limiting Metaphors and Enabling Constraints in Dawkins and Deleuze/Guattari , 2001 .

[13]  Trevor van Weeren,et al.  Designing digital knowledge management tools with Aboriginal Australians , 2007, Digit. Creativity.

[14]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Technomethodology: paradoxes and possibilities , 1996, CHI.

[15]  Rob Saunders,et al.  Enabling new forms of agency using wearable environments , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[16]  Kathy Velikov,et al.  Matters of Concern , 2009 .

[17]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[18]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Human agency and responsible computing: Implications for computer system design , 1992, J. Syst. Softw..

[19]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[20]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[21]  Paul Dourish,et al.  How emotion is made and measured , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  三嶋 博之 The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[23]  L. Suchman Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). , 2007 .

[24]  M. V. D. Velden,et al.  Design for a common world: On ethical agency and cognitive justice , 2009, Ethics and Information Technology.

[25]  Sha Xin Wei Poetics of performative space , 2008, Cognition, Communication and Interaction.

[26]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[27]  Margunn Aanestad,et al.  The Camera as an Actor Design-in-Use of Telemedicine Infrastructure in Surgery , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[28]  Rob Saunders,et al.  TRANSFORMATIONS , ENACTMENTS AND DISTRUST IN PROMOTING MULTIPLICITY IN DESIGN PROCESS , 2011 .

[29]  Georges M. Fadel,et al.  An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice , 2009 .

[30]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[31]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[32]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[33]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.

[34]  Mads Bødker,et al.  Performative artefacts: users "speaking through" artefacts in collaborative design , 2009, OZCHI.

[35]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Located Accountabilities in Technology Production , 2002, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Albena Yaneva,et al.  Give me a Gun and I will Make All Buildings Move: An ANT’s View of Architecture , 2008 .

[37]  Reyner Banham,et al.  The New Brutalism , 2011, October.

[38]  M. Callon The role of hybrid communities and socio-technical arrangements in the participatory design , 2004 .