Rearward movement of the heel at heel strike.

This paper describes the observation of rearward movement (RM) of the heel following heel strike occurring during normal gait. Thirty-one participants recruited as part of a larger study on slip kinematics walked the length of an 8-m runway at a speed of 1.5 m/s. Several floor surfaces, presented dry and with contaminant, were used for the purpose of eliciting a wide range of small slip distances. The normal force applied to a forceplate mounted in the runway was used to identify heel strike, as well as to calculate the utilized coefficient of friction during early stance phase. A motion analysis system tracked the displacement of two heel-mounted markers, and the data were used to derive kinematic variables related to the heel strike event. Results showed that RMs occurred in 18.1% of 494 trials, with a mean rearward displacement of 5.02 (+/-3.68) mm. When present, RMs occurred in close temporal proximity to heel strike, typically completing RM within 40 ms of the heel strike event. When divided into groups by age, older participants (>40 years) were more than twice as likely to have RMs as younger participants. When grouped by height or weight, differences in the proportion of trials with RMs were small. In trials where RMs were observed, forward slip distances were significantly less than for trials with no RMs, 2.17 (+/-3.87) mm vs. 12.58 (+/-10.71) mm, respectively. The time until the heel stopped moving during the post-heel strike period was not significantly different between RM and non-RM trials. Further investigation of this gait feature may improve understanding of normal gait patterns and may have implications for future slipmeter development.

[1]  E. T. Hsiao,et al.  Biomechanical influences on balance recovery by stepping. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Chien-Chi Chang,et al.  The use of a heel-mounted accelerometer as an adjunct measure of slip distance. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  Chien-Chi Chang,et al.  Association of subjective ratings of slipperiness to heel displacement following contact with the floor. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  Mark S. Redfern,et al.  Kinematics of the foot during slips , 2002 .

[5]  P. J. Perkins,et al.  Measurement of Slip Between the Shoe and Ground During Walking , 1978 .

[6]  Stephen W Marshall,et al.  Prevalence of selected risk and protective factors for falls in the home. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[7]  Karen L Troy,et al.  Recovery responses to surrogate slipping tasks differ from responses to actual slips. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[8]  Don B Chaffin,et al.  Kinematics of heelstrike during walking and carrying: implications for slip resistance testing , 2007, Ergonomics.

[9]  R. Cham,et al.  Heel contact dynamics during slip events on level and inclined surfaces , 2002 .

[10]  Tom B. Leamon,et al.  Slip Distance as an Objective Criterion to Determine the Dominant Parameter between Static and Dynamic Cofs , 1992 .

[11]  C. Anderson,et al.  Walkway Surfaces: Measurement of Slip Resistance , 1978 .

[12]  D. Winter,et al.  Gait in the elderly , 1997 .

[13]  Brian E. Moyer,et al.  Gait parameters as predictors of slip severity in younger and older adults , 2006, Ergonomics.

[14]  R. Cham,et al.  Changes in gait when anticipating slippery floors. , 2002, Gait & Posture.

[15]  L Strandberg,et al.  On accident analysis and slip-resistance measurement. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[16]  Lennart Strandberg,et al.  The dynamics of slipping accidents , 1981 .

[17]  Christianna S. Williams,et al.  Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.