Second screening for news: Effects of presentation on information processing and program liking

Abstract This study investigated the effects of second screen presentation mode on information processing and program liking. In an experiment, 121 participants watched a television news program. One group was assigned to a dual screen condition in which participants were required to actively look up additional information on a second screen (‘look-up condition’), while a second group were assigned to a dual screen condition in which participants were directly presented with the additional information on the second screen, with no looking-up required (‘presented information condition’). In a third condition, the single-screen condition, participants merely watched the news program. Results show that second screening negatively impacts factual recognition and program liking, regardless of presentation mode. While cued recall of information was lower in the second screen conditions than in the single screen condition, participants in the condition with presented information scored significantly higher on cued recall compared to the look-up condition. Analyses show the effects can be explained by the different levels of cognitive load elicited by different presentation modes.

[1]  J. Beentjes,et al.  Enjoyment of arousing television news: The role of age and sensation seeking , 2014 .

[2]  J. Russell,et al.  An approach to environmental psychology , 1974 .

[3]  FANGFANG DIAO,et al.  Orienting Response and Memory for Web Advertisements: , 2004, Commun. Res..

[4]  Zheng Wang,et al.  Multidimensions of Media Multitasking and Adaptive Media Selection , 2015 .

[5]  Yoori Hwang,et al.  Does Multitasking Increase or Decrease Persuasion? Effects of Multitasking on Comprehension and Counterarguing , 2012 .

[6]  Annie Lang,et al.  Media Multitasking: Good, Bad, or Ugly? , 2015 .

[7]  T. Gog,et al.  Measuring cognitive load with subjective rating scales during problem solving: differences between immediate and delayed ratings , 2015 .

[8]  Hilde A. M. Voorveld,et al.  Media multitasking and the effectiveness of combining online and radio advertising , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[10]  Brittany R. L. Duff,et al.  Doing It All: An Exploratory Study of Predictors of Media Multitasking , 2014 .

[11]  Mark Andrejevic,et al.  Second-screen theory: From the democratic surround to the digital enclosure , 2014 .

[12]  R. Mayer,et al.  Maximizing Constructivist Learning From Multimedia Communications by Minimizing Cognitive Load , 1999 .

[13]  M. Kleemans Arousing television news: Concept, causes, & consequences , 2013 .

[14]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[15]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[16]  Gabi Schaap,et al.  "TV no longer commands our full attention": Effects of second-screen viewing and task relevance on cognitive load and learning from news , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Yung Kyun Choi,et al.  When Intrusive Can Be Likable , 2011 .

[18]  Yoori Hwang,et al.  Media Multitasking Effects on Cognitive vs. Attitudinal Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis , 2016 .

[19]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[20]  Weiyu Zhang,et al.  Situational Factors Competing for Attention , 2010, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[21]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[22]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[23]  Yoori Hwang,et al.  Why do media users multitask?: Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Anastasia Kononova,et al.  Why do we multitask with media? Predictors of media multitasking among Internet users in the United States and Taiwan , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[26]  M. Huang,et al.  Flow, enduring, and situational involvement in the Web environment: A tripartite second-order examination , 2006 .

[27]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[28]  F. Paas,et al.  Measurement of Cognitive Load in Instructional Research , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[29]  Paul Coulton,et al.  Sharing the viewing experience through second screens , 2012, EuroITV.

[30]  John M. Tchernev,et al.  The “Myth” of Media Multitasking: Reciprocal Dynamics of Media Multitasking, Personal Needs, and Gratifications , 2012 .

[31]  Julia R. Fox,et al.  The Influence of Message and Audience Characteristics on TV News Grazing Behavior , 2013 .

[32]  Aishah Bakhtiar,et al.  Growing up multitasking: The costs and benefits for cognitive development , 2015 .

[33]  J. Sweller Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[34]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[35]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Examining Information Processing on the World Wide Web Using Think Aloud Protocols , 2000 .

[36]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Applying Research on the Uses and Cognitive Effects of Hypermedia to the Study of the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[37]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. , 2008, Psychological review.

[38]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[39]  Michael A. Horning,et al.  Interacting with news: Exploring the effects of modality and perceived responsiveness and control on news source credibility and enjoyment among second screen viewers , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  J. Merriënboer,et al.  Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning , 2005 .

[41]  Deborah Potter,et al.  How attention partitions itself during simultaneous message presentations , 2005 .

[42]  H. G. D. Zúñiga,et al.  What Is Second Screening? Exploring Motivations of Second Screen Use and Its Effect on Online Political Participation , 2015 .

[43]  Jon-Chao Hong,et al.  Gender differences in cognitive load and competition anxiety affect 6th grade students' attitude toward playing and intention to play at a sequential or synchronous game , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[44]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Selective Exposure To Communication , 2013 .

[45]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[46]  Allerd Peeters,et al.  Explaining Effects of Sensationalism on Liking of Television News Stories , 2008, Commun. Res..

[47]  Hongjin Shim,et al.  What makes us two-screen users? The effects of two-screen viewing motivation and psychological traits on social interactions , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  Peter Vorderer,et al.  Does Entertainment Suffer From Interactivity? The Impact of Watching an Interactive TV Movie on Viewers' Experience of Entertainment , 2001 .

[49]  Chance York,et al.  Overloaded By the News: Effects of News Exposure and Enjoyment on Reporting Information Overload , 2013 .

[50]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Flow Online: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects , 2009 .

[52]  Yoonhyuk Jung,et al.  The effects of second-screen viewing and the goal congruency of supplementary content on user perceptions , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  Se-Hoon Jeong,et al.  Predictors of Multitasking with Media: Media Factors and Audience Factors , 2007 .

[54]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[55]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[56]  Brittany R. L. Duff,et al.  The effect of multitasking on time perception, enjoyment, and ad evaluation , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  J. G. Webster,et al.  Structural determinants of exposure to television: The case of repeat viewing , 1992 .