Properties of the primary organization field in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. II. Positional information for axial organization in embryos with two head organizers.

The results are reported of a series of experiments, the exact geometry of which has been presented in a previous paper. Late blastulae and early stage-10 gastrulae are supplied with a second head organizer region at varying angular distances, in the marginal zone, from the presumptive site of their own organizer. The configuration of positional information existing in the mesodermal mantle of the late gastrula or earliest neurula, as a final result of such operations, was recorded by observing the pattern of axial organ differentiation obtained by tailbud stages (26–28). The operational differences between various current theories as to the nature of embryonic differentiation fields are briefly discussed, as a framework within which to consider the results of experiments such as those reported here. It is suggested that in the future, and using the present results as a basis, experiments may be possible that are more critical in distinguishing between the various theoretical suppositions involved. Evidence is presented that the final configuration of positional information, achieved as a result of the implantation of a second head organizer at or before the onset of host gastrulation, becomes stable some time before it is irreversibly expressed in terms of a pattern of cell commitment in the mesodermal/endodermal mantle. It is insensitive both to relative ages of host and graft at the time of operation, over the range employed and, probably, to the ambient temperature of development between operation and the time of cell differentiation, being dependent only on the angular distance originally existing between graft and presumptive host organizer sites. In the discussion, a model is given for the visualization of positional information in partially double fields, produced in a two-dimensional sheet of cells where the normal end-point of field formation is a bilateral symmetry of differentiation zones.

[1]  J. Cooke Properties of the primary organization field in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. V. Regulation after removal of the head organizer, in normal early gastrulae and in those already possessing a second implanted organizer. , 1973, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[2]  J. Cooke Properties of the primary organization field in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. IV. Pattern formation and regulation following early inhibition of mitosis. , 1973, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[3]  F. Crick,et al.  A gradient of positional information in an insect, Rhodnius. , 1972, Journal of cell science.

[4]  J. Cooke Properties of the primary organization field in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. I. Autonomy of cell behaviour at the site of initial organizer formation. , 1972, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[5]  O K Wilby,et al.  Experimental studies on axial polarity in hydra. , 1970, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[6]  O K Wilby,et al.  Studies on the transmission of hypostome inhibition in hydra. , 1970, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[7]  F. Crick Diffusion in Embryogenesis , 1970, Nature.

[8]  B. Goodwin,et al.  A phase-shift model for the spatial and temporal organization of developing systems. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  L. Wolpert Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  L. Hamilton The formation of somites in Xenopus. , 1969, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[11]  P. Nieuwkoop The “Organization centre” , 1967, Acta biotheoretica.

[12]  R. Flickinger,et al.  The relation of DNA synthesis to RNA synthesis in developing frog embryos. , 1967, Developmental biology.

[13]  R. W. Morgan,et al.  Changes in the cell cycle during early amphibian development , 1966 .

[14]  G. Webster Studies on pattern regulation in hydra. II. Factors controlling hypostome formation. , 1966, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[15]  G. Webster Studies on pattern regulation in hydra. 3. Dynamic aspects of factors controlling hypostome formation. , 1966, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[16]  C. Waddington,et al.  Ultrastructure of the blastopore cells in the newt. , 1966, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[17]  A. Curtis Morphogenetic interactions before gastrulation in the amphibian, Xenopus laevis--regulation in blastulae. , 1962, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[18]  A. Curtis Morphogenetic interactions before gastrulation in the amphibian, Xenopus laevis--the cortical field. , 1962, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[19]  S. Rose,et al.  A Hierarchy of Self-Limiting Reactions as the Basis of Cellular Differentiation and Growth Control , 1952, The American Naturalist.

[20]  P. Nieuwkoop,et al.  Activation and organization of the central nervous system in amphibians. Part III. Synthesis of a new working hypothesis , 1952 .

[21]  P. Lawrence The organization of the insect segment. , 1971, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[22]  Cohen Mh,et al.  Models for the control of development. , 1971 .

[23]  L. Wolpert,et al.  Positional information and pattern regulation in regeneration of hydra. , 1971, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[24]  M. Cohen Models for the control of development. , 1971, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[25]  Peter A. Lawrence,et al.  Polarity and Patterns in the Postembryonic Development of Insects , 1970 .

[26]  P. Nieuwkoop The “Organization centre” , 1967, Acta biotheoretica.

[27]  C. Waddington Fields and Gradients , 1966 .

[28]  H. Holtzer CONTROL OF CHONDROGENESIS IN THE EMBRYO. , 1964, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  Analysis of development , 1955 .

[30]  A. Dalcq,et al.  Une conception nouvelle des bases physiologiques de la morphogénèse , 1937 .