Regional hospital solid waste assessment using the evidential reasoning approach.

Hospital solid waste assessment is regularly characterized by a large number of known criteria that are both qualitative and quantitative in nature. The qualitative criteria can only be assessed by human judgments, which predictably engage a variety of uncertainties such as fuzziness and ignorance. Therefore, hospital solid waste assessments need to be analyzed and modeled using approaches that can handle uncertainties. The evidential reasoning (ER) approach can be utilized for such an analysis. In this paper, perhaps for the first time, the ER approach is applied to regional hospital solid waste assessment. The assessment criteria are characterized by a set of assessment grades assumed to be commonly exclusive and communally exhaustive. All assessment information, incomplete or complete, qualitative or quantitative, and imprecise or precise, are modeled using a cohesive belief structure. The ER approach will be used to aggregate multiple hospital solid waste assessment criteria, resulting in distributed assessment for each alternative. The proposed methodology is applied for regional hospital solid waste assessment in the province of Khuzestan, Iran.

[1]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[2]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning Approach-RIMER , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[3]  Catherine K. Murphy.  Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Yesim Kop,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) of solid waste collection methods using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) outputs , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering.

[5]  Thierry Denoeux,et al.  Handling possibilistic labels in pattern classification using evidential reasoning , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[6]  Malcolm J. Beynon,et al.  Understanding local ignorance and non-specificity within the DS/AHP method of multi-criteria decision making , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  A R Awad,et al.  Mathematical-Statistical Models of Generated Hazardous Hospital Solid Waste , 2004, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[8]  Sabino De Gisi,et al.  Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP. , 2010, Waste management.

[9]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  M. Singh,et al.  An Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple-Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[11]  Mohammad Karamouz,et al.  Development of a Master Plan for Water Pollution Control Using MCDM Techniques: A Case Study , 2003 .

[12]  Larry W. Canter,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment , 1995 .

[13]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[15]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  A Comparison of Bayesian and Belief Function Reasoning , 2003, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[16]  Eyke Hüllermeier,et al.  Similarity-based inference as evidential reasoning , 2000, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[17]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Comparison of evidence theory and Bayesian theory for uncertainty modeling , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A General Multi-Level Evaluation Process for Hybrid MADM With Uncertainty , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[19]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  James W. Hall,et al.  A software-supported process for assembling evidence and handling uncertainty in decision-making , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  N. Pal,et al.  QUANTIFICATION OF CONFLICT IN DEMPSTER-SHAFER FRAMEWORK: A NEW APPROACH , 1996 .

[22]  Ling Xu,et al.  Application of FCE–AHP method for multi-criteria decision-making of municipal solid waste management alternatives: a case study in the Dalian Development Zone of China , 2011 .

[23]  Mohammad Karamouz,et al.  Monitoring and Evaluation Scheme using the Multiple-Criteria-Decision-Making Technique: Application to Irrigation Projects , 2002 .

[24]  Mohammad Karamouz,et al.  Developing a master plan for hospital solid waste management: a case study. , 2007, Waste management.

[25]  A J Morrissey,et al.  Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. , 2004, Waste management.

[26]  Zamali Tarmudi,et al.  A new fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for municipal solid waste disposal options , 2009 .

[27]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Evidential Reasoning Based Hierarchical Analysis for Design Selection of Ship Retro-Fit Options , 1994 .

[28]  T. Saaty.  Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1994 .

[29]  L. Liberti,et al.  Optimization of Infectious Hospital Waste Management in Italy: Part II. Waste Characterization By Origin , 1996 .

[30]  Sunil Kumar,et al.  Selection of a Landfill Site for Solid Waste Management: An Application of AHP and Spatial Analyst Tool , 2013, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing.

[31]  Goran Vego,et al.  Application of multi-criteria decision-making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia, Croatia. , 2008, Waste management.

[32]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..