Assessment of bootstrap resampling performance for PET data

Bootstrap resampling has been successfully used for estimation of statistical uncertainty of parameters such as tissue metabolism, blood flow or displacement fields for image registration. The performance of bootstrap resampling as applied to PET list-mode data of the human brain and dedicated phantoms is assessed in a novel and systematic way such that: (1) the assessment is carried out in two resampling stages: the 'real world' stage where multiple reference datasets of varying statistical level are generated and the 'bootstrap world' stage where corresponding bootstrap replicates are generated from the reference datasets. (2) All resampled datasets were reconstructed yielding images from which multiple voxel and regions of interest (ROI) values were extracted to form corresponding distributions between the two stages. (3) The difference between the distributions from both stages was quantified using the Jensen-Shannon divergence and the first four moments. It was found that the bootstrap distributions are consistently different to the real world distributions across the statistical levels. The difference was explained by a shift in the mean (up to 33% for voxels and 14% for ROIs) being proportional to the inverse square root of the statistical level (number of counts). Other moments were well replicated by the bootstrap although for very low statistical levels the estimation of the variance was poor. Therefore, the bootstrap method should be used with care when estimating systematic errors (bias) and variance when very low statistical levels are present such as in early time frames of dynamic acquisitions, when the underlying population may not be sufficiently represented.

[1]  Ranjan Maitra,et al.  An approximate bootstrap technique for variance estimation in parametric images , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  S. Glick,et al.  Using the bootstrap method to evaluate image noise for investigation of axial collimation in hybrid PET , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  Andrew J Reader,et al.  Task-oriented quantitative image reconstruction in emission tomography for single- and multi-subject studies , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Yaakov Stern,et al.  Multivariate and univariate neuroimaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease , 2008, NeuroImage.

[5]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  D R Haynor,et al.  Resampling estimates of precision in emission tomography. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[7]  Magnus Dahlbom,et al.  Estimation of image noise in PET using the bootstrap method , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[8]  A J Reader,et al.  A custom-built PET phantom design for quantitative imaging of printed distributions. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  A new improved version of the realistic digital brain phantom , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Comparison of Bootstrap Resampling Methods for 3-D PET Imaging , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[12]  Sunil L. Kukreja,et al.  Bootstrapped DEPICT for error estimation in PET functional imaging , 2004, NeuroImage.

[13]  Julian C. Matthews,et al.  Robustness of multivariate image analysis assessed by resampling techniques and applied to FDG-PET scans of patients with Alzheimer's disease , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  G Lucignani,et al.  Estimation of Component and Parameter Distributions in Spectral Analysis , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  Irène Buvat,et al.  A non-parametric bootstrap approach for analysing the statistical properties of SPECT and PET images. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  S. Glick,et al.  Performance evaluation of the channelized Hotelling observer using bootstrap list-mode PET studies , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[17]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  EM algorithm system modeling by image-space techniques for PET reconstruction , 2003 .

[18]  C. Comtat,et al.  Image based resolution modeling for the HRRT OSEM reconstructions software , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[19]  Karl Herholz,et al.  Robustness of correlations between PCA of FDG-PET scans and biological variables in healthy and demented subjects , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  Z. H. Cho,et al.  Ultra Fast Symmetry and SIMD-Based Projection-Backprojection (SSP) Algorithm for 3-D PET Image Reconstruction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  R. Van de Walle,et al.  Evaluating human observer performance for list mode PET using the bootstrap method , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[22]  I. Buvat,et al.  A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.