Reconfigurable 3D-Printed headplates for reproducible and rapid implantation of EEG, EMG and depth electrodes in mice

Mouse models are beneficial to understanding neural networks given a wide array of transgenic mice and cell-selective techniques. However, instrumentation of mice for neurophysiological studies is difficult. Often surgery is prolonged with experimental error arising from non-concurrent and variable implantations. While similar approaches with microelectrodes have been used in rats before, and related approaches exist for targeting tetrodes to one brain region, we do not know of similar head-plates for mice, nor a strictly source-code and easily reconfigurable approach. We describe a method that provides: Implantation of the headplate reliably takes less than 40 minutes, enabling a cohort of eight mice to be implanted in one day. Good quality recordings were obtained after surgical recovery and the headplate was stable for at least four weeks. Microwire electrode placement was found to be accurate.

[1]  Vance Gao,et al.  Multiple classifier systems for automatic sleep scoring in mice , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  D. Wahlsten Genetic variation in the development of mouse brain and behavior: evidence from the middle postnatal period. , 1975, Developmental psychobiology.

[3]  David Costa-Miserachs,et al.  Automated sleep staging in rat with a standard spreadsheet , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Ann M. Graybiel,et al.  HOPE: Hybrid-Drive Combining Optogenetics, Pharmacology and Electrophysiology , 2018, Front. Neural Circuits.

[5]  Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt,et al.  Morphological maturation of the mouse brain: An in vivo MRI and histology investigation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[6]  D. Wahlsten,et al.  Implications of genetic variation in mouse brain structure for electrode placement by stereotaxic surgery , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  Christelle Anaclet,et al.  Basal forebrain control of wakefulness and cortical rhythms , 2015, Nature Communications.

[8]  Sergey L. Gratiy,et al.  Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity , 2017, Nature.

[9]  Matthew Wilson,et al.  Design and Fabrication of Ultralight Weight, Adjustable Multi-electrode Probes for Electrophysiological Recordings in Mice , 2014, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[10]  Clifford B Saper,et al.  Supramammillary glutamate neurons are a key node of the arousal system , 2017, Nature Communications.

[11]  R. Mark Henkelman,et al.  High resolution three-dimensional brain atlas using an average magnetic resonance image of 40 adult C57Bl/6J mice , 2008, NeuroImage.

[12]  Li Liang,et al.  Scalable, Lightweight, Integrated and Quick-to-Assemble (SLIQ) Hyperdrives for Functional Circuit Dissection , 2017, Front. Neural Circuits.

[13]  D. Henshall,et al.  Distinct behavioral and epileptic phenotype differences in 129/P mice compared to C57BL/6 mice subject to intraamygdala kainic acid-induced status epilepticus , 2016, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[14]  Jakob Voigts,et al.  The flexDrive: an ultra-light implant for optical control and highly parallel chronic recording of neuronal ensembles in freely moving mice , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[15]  George Paxinos,et al.  The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 2001 .

[16]  Drew B Headley,et al.  Incorporating 3D-printing technology in the design of head-caps and electrode drives for recording neurons in multiple brain regions. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Peyman Golshani,et al.  All the light that we can see: a new era in miniaturized microscopy , 2018, Nature Methods.

[18]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Brain-wide Electrical Spatiotemporal Dynamics Encode Depression Vulnerability , 2018, Cell.

[19]  Hee-Sup Shin,et al.  High resolution electroencephalography in freely moving mice. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Farnaz Sharif,et al.  Micro-drive and headgear for chronic implant and recovery of optoelectronic probes , 2017, Scientific Reports.