Financial Valuation and Risk Management Working Paper No . 248 Individual Irrationality and Aggregate Outcomes

There is abundant evidence that many individuals violate the rationality assumptions routinely made in economics. However, powerful evidence also indicates that violations of individual rationality do not necessarily refute the aggregate predictions of standard economic models that assume full rationality of all agents. Thus, a key question is how the interactions between rational and irrational people shape the aggregate outcome in markets and other institutions. We discuss evidence indicating that strategic complementarity and strategic substitutability are decisive determinants of aggregate outcomes. Under strategic complementarity, a small amount of individual irrationality may lead to large deviations from the aggregate predictions of rational models, whereas a minority of rational agents may suffice to generate aggregate outcomes consistent with the predictions of rational models under strategic substitutability.

[1]  Jean-Robert Tyran,et al.  Money Illusion and Coordination Failure , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[2]  C. Plott,et al.  Prices and Portfolio Choices in Financial Markets: Theory and Experiment , 2005 .

[3]  John A. List,et al.  Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis , 2005 .

[4]  Christopher Polk,et al.  Money Illusion in the Stock Market: The Modigliani-Cohn Hypothesis , 2005 .

[5]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Safety in Markets: An Impossibility Theorem for Dutch Books , 2007 .

[6]  P. Kooreman,et al.  Charity Donations and the Euro Introduction: Some Quasi-Experimental Evidence on Money Illusion , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  Steve B. Wyatt,et al.  Are Judgment Errors Reflected in Market Prices and Allocations? Experimental Evidence Based on the Monty Hall Problem , 2004 .

[8]  P. Temin,et al.  Riding the South Sea Bubble , 2003 .

[9]  J. List Does market experience eliminate market anomalies , 2003 .

[10]  [Perspectives on Behavioral Finance: Does "Irrationality" Disappear with Wealth? Evidence from Expectations and Actions]: Comment , 2003, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[11]  E. Fehr,et al.  Limited Rationality and Strategic Interaction - the Impact of the Strategic Environment on Nominal Inertia , 2007 .

[12]  Lucy F. Ackert,et al.  Bubbles in Experimental Asset Markets: Irrational Exuberance No More , 2002 .

[13]  Helge Bennmarker,et al.  Wage Policy and Endogenous Wage Rigidity: A Representative View from the Inside , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  C. Plott,et al.  NONSPECULATIVE BUBBLES IN EXPERIMENTAL ASSET MARKETS: LACK OF COMMON KNOWLEDGE OF RATIONALITY VS. ACTUAL IRRATIONALITY , 2001 .

[15]  David Genesove,et al.  Loss Aversion and Seller Behaviour: Evidence from the Housing Market , 2001 .

[16]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance , 2002 .

[17]  Donald V. Moser,et al.  Do Asset Market Prices Reflect Traders' Judgment Biases? , 2000 .

[18]  R. Cooper,et al.  Coordination Games: Technological Complementarities , 1999 .

[19]  E. Fehr,et al.  Wage Rigidity in a Competitive Incomplete Contract Market , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  Daniel Friedman,et al.  Monty Hall's Three Doors: Construction and Deconstruction of a Choice Anomaly , 1998 .

[21]  Karim Jamal,et al.  Bayesian Equilibrium in Double Auctions Populated by Biased Heuristic Traders , 1996 .

[22]  A. Shleifer,et al.  The Limits of Arbitrage , 1995 .

[23]  V. Smith,et al.  Stock Market Bubbles in the Laboratory , 1994 .

[24]  Dhananjay K. Gode,et al.  Allocative Efficiency of Markets with Zero-Intelligence Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  The rationality of prices and volume in experimental markets , 1992 .

[26]  Robert B. Barsky,et al.  Why Does the Stock Market Fluctuate? , 1992 .

[27]  L. Summers,et al.  Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Limited Rationality and Strategic Complements: The Implications for Macroeconomics , 1989 .

[29]  L. Summers,et al.  Positive Feedback Investment Strategies and Destabilizing Rational Speculation , 1989 .

[30]  R. Shiller,et al.  The Behavior of Home Buyers in Boom and Post-Boom Markets , 1988 .

[31]  V. Smith,et al.  Bubbles, Crashes, and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets , 1988 .

[32]  L. Summers,et al.  The Survival of Noise Traders in Financial Markets , 1988 .

[33]  P. Junger Evaluating Uncertain Evidence with Sir Thomas Bayes: A Note for Teachers , 1988 .

[34]  Colin Camerer Do Biases in Probability Judgment Matter in Markets? Experimental Evidence , 1987 .

[35]  B. Nalebuff Puzzles: Choose a Curtain, Duel-ity, Two Point Conversions, and More , 1987 .

[36]  Olivier J. Blanchard,et al.  Monopolistic Competition and the Effects of Aggregate Demand , 1987 .

[37]  Kenneth A. Froot,et al.  Explaining the Demand for Dollars: International Rates of Return and the Expectations of Chartists and Fundamentalists , 1986 .

[38]  Janet L. Yellen,et al.  Can Small Deviations from Rationality Make Significant Differences to Economic Equilibria , 1985 .

[39]  Thomas Russell,et al.  The Relevance of Quasi Rationality in Competitive Markets: Reply , 1985 .

[40]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Rational Expectations and the Limits of Rationality: An Analysis of Heterogeneity , 1983 .

[41]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma , 1982 .

[42]  V. Smith Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science , 1982 .

[43]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[44]  I. Fisher,et al.  The Money Illusion. , 1929 .