Optimization of a heliostat field site in central receiver systems based on analysis of site slope effect

Abstract This paper proposes a methodology to select a site for a heliostat field to further improve its optical efficiency. Site selection implies to select a location with advantageous geographical features for optical efficiency improvement. Therefore, analysis on the site slope effect and guideline to select the most optically efficient site type are the main concerns of this study. The paper consists of two parts: (1) analysis of the site slope effect and determination of the most efficient site type at each latitude, and (2) optimization of heliostat layout on the optimal site for further improvement. Latitude is treated as a control variable since it changes all the solar characteristics, so the site effects at different latitudes are examined independently in this study. Surrogate modeling and genetic algorithm are utilized for efficient and accurate optimization of the heliostat field layout. This study reveals that the optimal site type varies according to the latitude, and utilization of the most efficient heliostat field site improves the optical efficiency by up to 1.65% point that can hardly be achieved by field layout optimization only. Furthermore, this study suggests the applicability of central receiver system (CRS) at high latitude with appropriate site selection and layout optimization.

[1]  Elysia J. Sheu,et al.  A Review of Hybrid Solar–Fossil Fuel Power Generation Systems and Performance Metrics , 2012 .

[2]  B L Kistler,et al.  A user's manual for DELSOL3: A computer code for calculating the optical performance and optimal system design for solar thermal central receiver plants , 1986 .

[3]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .

[4]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  A Unifying View of Sparse Approximate Gaussian Process Regression , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[5]  Fahad A. Al-Sulaiman,et al.  Optimization of heliostat field layout in solar central receiver systems on annual basis using differential evolution algorithm , 2015 .

[6]  Yongping Yang,et al.  Comparing Study of Biomimetic Spiral and Radial Staggered Layouts of the Heliostat Field , 2015 .

[7]  Emilio Carrizosa,et al.  Optimization of multiple receivers solar power tower systems , 2015 .

[8]  Xavier Pelet,et al.  Multi-objective thermoeconomic optimisation of the design of heliostat field of solar tower power plants , 2007 .

[9]  Zhifeng Wang,et al.  Modeling and simulation of the pioneer 1 MW solar thermal central receiver system in China , 2009 .

[10]  Manuel Torrilhon,et al.  Heliostat field optimization: A new computationally efficient model and biomimetic layout , 2012 .

[11]  D. Yogi Goswami,et al.  A computationally efficient method for the design of the heliostat field for solar power tower plant , 2014 .

[12]  Yingxue Yao,et al.  Heliostat field layout methodology in central receiver systems based on efficiency-related distribution , 2015 .

[13]  Elysia J. Sheu,et al.  Optimization of a hybrid solar-fossil fuel plant: Solar steam reforming of methane in a combined cycle , 2013 .

[14]  W. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes , 1985 .

[15]  Alexander Mitsos,et al.  Site selection for hillside central receiver solar thermal plants , 2011 .

[16]  P. Talebizadeh,et al.  Optimization of Heliostat Layout in Central Receiver Solar Power Plants , 2014 .

[17]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Diagnostics for Gaussian Process Emulators , 2009, Technometrics.

[18]  Ikjin Lee,et al.  Development of performance analysis model for central receiver system and its application to pattern-free heliostat layout optimization , 2017 .

[19]  Francisco J. Collado,et al.  Two-stages optimised design of the collector field of solar power tower plants , 2016 .

[20]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[21]  Xiudong Wei,et al.  A new code for the design and analysis of the heliostat field layout for power tower system , 2010 .

[22]  Zhifeng Wang,et al.  A new method for the design of the heliostat field layout for solar tower power plant , 2010 .

[23]  Bruno D’Aguanno,et al.  CRS4-2: A numerical code for the calculation of the solar power collected in a central receiver syst , 2011 .

[24]  Jean-Jacques Bezian,et al.  PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION OF SOLAR CENTRAL RECEIVER SYSTEMS FROM A MONTE CARLO DIRECT MODEL , 2013 .

[25]  Francisco J. Collado,et al.  Quick evaluation of the annual heliostat field efficiency , 2008 .

[26]  Sebastian-James Bode,et al.  On Using a Gradient-based Method for Heliostat Field Layout Optimization , 2014 .

[27]  Weidong Huang,et al.  Development of an analytical method and its quick algorithm to calculate the solar energy collected by a heliostat field in a year , 2014 .

[28]  F. W. Lipps,et al.  A solar flux density calculation for a solar tower concentrator using a two-dimensional Hermite function expansion , 1977 .

[29]  Manuel Romero,et al.  Methodology for generation of heliostat field layout in central receiver systems based on yearly normalized energy surfaces , 2006 .

[30]  A. Ramos,et al.  Strategies in tower solar power plant optimization , 2012 .

[31]  A. Kribus,et al.  Solar hybrid steam injection gas turbine (STIG) cycle , 2012 .

[32]  Edgar N. Sanchez,et al.  Neural control for a field of concentrator heliostats , 2014, 2014 World Automation Congress (WAC).

[33]  F. W. Lipps,et al.  A cellwise method for the optimization of large central receiver systems , 1978 .

[34]  Ikjin Lee,et al.  Variable selection using Gaussian process regression-based metrics for high-dimensional model approximation with limited data , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[35]  Francisco J. Collado,et al.  Campo: Generation of regular heliostat fields , 2012 .