Collaborative Mission Design at NASA Langley Research Center

NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) has developed and tested two facilities dedicated to increasing efficiency in key mission design processes, including payload design, mission planning, and implementation plan development, among others. The Integrated Design Center (IDC) is a state-of-the-art concurrent design facility which allows scientists and spaceflight engineers to produce project designs and mission plans in a real-time collaborative environment, using industry-standard physics-based development tools and the latest communication technology. The Mission Simulation Lab (MiSL), a virtual reality (VR) facility focused on payload and project design, permits engineers to quickly translate their design and modeling output into enhanced three-dimensional models and then examine them in a realistic full-scale virtual environment. The authors were responsible for envisioning both facilities and turning those visions into fully operational mission design resources at LaRC with multiple advanced capabilities and applications. In addition, the authors have created a synergistic interface between these two facilities. This combined functionality is the Interactive Design and Simulation Center (IDSC), a meta-facility which offers project teams a powerful array of highly advanced tools, permitting them to rapidly produce project designs while maintaining the integrity of the input from every discipline expert on the project. The concept-to-flight mission support provided by IDSC has shown improved inter- and intra-team communication and a reduction in the resources required for proposal development, requirements definition, and design effort.

[1]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Passive haptics significantly enhances virtual environments , 2001 .

[2]  Greg Welch,et al.  The HiBall Tracker: high-performance wide-area tracking for virtual and augmented environments , 1999, VRST '99.

[3]  R. Marshall Smith.  A Description of the Cockpit Motion Facility and the Research Flight Deck Simulator , 2000 .

[4]  Michael S. Wusk.  ARIES: NASA Langley's Airborne Research Facility , 2002 .

[5]  J. Neff,et al.  Implementing a collaborative conceptual design system: the human element is the most powerful part of the system , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[6]  I Chung Victoria,et al.  A Unique Software System for Simulation-to-Flight Research , 2001 .

[7]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  K. I. Oxnevad.  The NPDT - the next generation concurrent design approach , 2000 .

[9]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Effects of Handling Real Objects and Self-Avatar Fidelity on Cognitive Task Performance and Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Knut I. Oxnevad.  A Concurrent Design Environment for Designing Space Instruments , 1999 .

[11]  David M. Winker,et al.  CALIPSO: global aerosol and cloud observations from lidar and passive instruments , 2003, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[12]  Benjamin Lok,et al.  A pipeline for rapidly incorporating real objects into a mixed environment , 2005, Fourth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR'05).

[13]  D. P. Thunnissen,et al.  Icemaker/sup TM/: an excel-based environment for collaborative design , 2003, 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8652).

[14]  Benjamin Lok,et al.  Rapidly Incorporating Real Objects for Evaluation of Engineering Designs in a Mixed Reality Environment , 2005 .