Prediction and integration in native and second-language processing of elliptical structures*

According to recent views of L2-sentence processing, L2-speakers do not predict upcoming information to the same extent as do native speakers. To investigate L2-speakers’ predictive use and integration of syntactic information across clauses, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) from advanced L2-learners and native speakers while they read sentences in which the syntactic context did or did not allow noun-ellipsis (Lau, E., Stroud, C., Plesch, S., & Phillips, C. (2006). The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language, 98, 74–88.) Both native and L2-speakers were sensitive to the context when integrating words after the potential ellipsis-site. However, native, but not L2-speakers, anticipated the ellipsis, as suggested by an ERP difference between elliptical and non-elliptical contexts preceding the potential ellipsis-site. In addition, L2-learners displayed a late frontal negativity for ungrammaticalities, suggesting differences in repair strategies or resources compared with native speakers.

[1]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[2]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[4]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[5]  Robert A. Bornstein,et al.  The Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised , 1990 .

[6]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[8]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[9]  A. Friederici,et al.  Verb Argument Structure Processing: The Role of Verb-Specific and Argument-Specific Information☆☆☆ , 2000 .

[10]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[11]  A. Friederici,et al.  Processing a second language: Late learners''comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related b , 2001 .

[12]  A. Friederici,et al.  Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[14]  E. Kaan,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: a comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  R. Berndt,et al.  Working memory retention systems: a state of activated long-term memory. , 2003, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[16]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Expecting Gender: An Event Related Brain Potential Study on the Role of Grammatical Gender in Comprehending a Line Drawing Within a Written Sentence in Spanish , 2003, Cortex.

[17]  M. Kutas,et al.  Anticipating Words and Their Gender: An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration, Gender Expectancy, and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  A. Friederici,et al.  Word category and verb–argument structure information in the dynamics of parsing , 2004, Cognition.

[19]  Laura Sabourin,et al.  Memory effects in syntactic ERP tasks , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  Frank Rösler,et al.  Different Anaphoric Expressions Are Investigated by Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[21]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[24]  C. Felser,et al.  Grammatical processing in language learners , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[25]  Merel Keijzer,et al.  Last in first out? : An investigation of the regression hypothesis in Dutch emigrants in Anglophone Canada , 2007 .

[26]  Frédéric Isel,et al.  Syntactic and referential processes in second-language learners: event-related brain potential evidence , 2007, Neuroreport.

[27]  Margarita Kaushanskaya,et al.  The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[28]  L. Stowe,et al.  Second language processing: when are first and second languages processed similarly? , 2008 .

[29]  Craig G. Chambers,et al.  Lexical competition during second-language listening: sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Holger Hopp,et al.  The syntax–discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance* , 2009, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[31]  H. Rabagliati,et al.  Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex , 2009, Cognition.

[32]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Morphosyntactic Processing in Late Second-Language Learners , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  A. Fernald,et al.  Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.

[34]  Frank Wijnen,et al.  Syntactic predictions in second-language sentence processing , 2010 .

[35]  C.J.W. Zwart,et al.  Structure preserved : studies in syntax for Jan Koster , 2010 .

[36]  N. Corver,et al.  Ellipsis in Dutch possessive noun phrases: a micro-comparative approach , 2010 .

[37]  Thomas A. Farmer,et al.  Early Occipital Sensitivity to Syntactic Category Is Based on Form Typicality , 2010, Psychological science.

[38]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism , 2011 .

[39]  Peter Indefrey,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: Electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to spelling violations , 2011, NeuroImage.

[40]  Kara Morgan-Short,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Second Language Training Differentially Affect the Achievement of Native-like Brain Activation Patterns , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Anne Fernald,et al.  Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? , 2012, Second language research.

[42]  José Alemán Bañón,et al.  The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance , 2012, Brain Research.

[43]  Diana V. Dimitrova,et al.  Neural correlates of prosody and information structure , 2012 .

[44]  Kristin Lemhöfer,et al.  Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[45]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies , 2012, Brain and Language.

[46]  Clara D. Martin,et al.  Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do , 2013 .

[47]  L Robert Slevc,et al.  Memory and cognitive control in an integrated theory of language processing , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[48]  Hannah Rohde,et al.  L2 processing is affected by RAGE: Evidence from reference resolution , 2013 .

[49]  D. Tanner,et al.  Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension* , 2013, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[50]  Paola E. Dussias,et al.  WHEN GENDER AND LOOKING GO HAND IN HAND , 2013, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[51]  Holger Hopp,et al.  Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability , 2013 .

[52]  Frank Wijnen,et al.  Processing Gapped Verbs , 2012, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[53]  Colin Phillips,et al.  The psycholinguistics of ellipsis , 2014 .

[54]  D. Tanner,et al.  ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  Albert Costa,et al.  Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  Edith Kaan,et al.  Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? , 2014 .