Toward DNA-based facial composites: preliminary results and validation.

The potential of constructing useful DNA-based facial composites is forensically of great interest. Given the significant identity information coded in the human face these predictions could help investigations out of an impasse. Although, there is substantial evidence that much of the total variation in facial features is genetically mediated, the discovery of which genes and gene variants underlie normal facial variation has been hampered primarily by the multipartite nature of facial variation. Traditionally, such physical complexity is simplified by simple scalar measurements defined a priori, such as nose or mouth width or alternatively using dimensionality reduction techniques such as principal component analysis where each principal coordinate is then treated as a scalar trait. However, as shown in previous and related work, a more impartial and systematic approach to modeling facial morphology is available and can facilitate both the gene discovery steps, as we recently showed, and DNA-based facial composite construction, as we show here. We first use genomic ancestry and sex to create a base-face, which is simply an average sex and ancestry matched face. Subsequently, the effects of 24 individual SNPs that have been shown to have significant effects on facial variation are overlaid on the base-face forming the predicted-face in a process akin to a photomontage or image blending. We next evaluate the accuracy of predicted faces using cross-validation. Physical accuracy of the facial predictions either locally in particular parts of the face or in terms of overall similarity is mainly determined by sex and genomic ancestry. The SNP-effects maintain the physical accuracy while significantly increasing the distinctiveness of the facial predictions, which would be expected to reduce false positives in perceptual identification tasks. To the best of our knowledge this is the first effort at generating facial composites from DNA and the results are preliminary but certainly promising, especially considering the limited amount of genetic information about the face contained in these 24 SNPs. This approach can incorporate additional SNPs as these are discovered and their effects documented. In this context we discuss three main avenues of research: expanding our knowledge of the genetic architecture of facial morphology, improving the predictive modeling of facial morphology by exploring and incorporating alternative prediction models, and increasing the value of the results through the weighted encoding of physical measurements in terms of human perception of faces.

[1]  Daniel Gianola,et al.  Using Whole-Genome Sequence Data to Predict Quantitative Trait Phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[2]  Mary L Marazita,et al.  Heritability of Face Shape in Twins: A Preliminary Study using 3D Stereophotogrammetry and Geometric Morphometrics. , 2013, Dentistry 3000.

[3]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  An empirical comparison of permutation methods for tests of partial regression coefficients in a linear model , 1999 .

[4]  P. Claes,et al.  Improved facial outcome assessment using a 3D anthropometric mask. , 2012, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[5]  Wojciech Branicki,et al.  Prediction of eye color in the Slovenian population using the IrisPlex SNPs , 2013, Croatian medical journal.

[6]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Modeling 3D Facial Shape from DNA , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[7]  Marleen de Bruijne,et al.  A Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Five Loci Influencing Facial Morphology in Europeans , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[8]  Susan E. Brennan,et al.  Caricature Generator: The Dynamic Exaggeration of Faces by Computer , 2017 .

[9]  P. Claes,et al.  The Facial Evolution: Looking Backward and Moving Forward , 2013, Human mutation.

[10]  John M. Butler,et al.  Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing , 2009 .

[11]  L. Jin,et al.  Ethnic-affiliation estimation by use of population-specific DNA markers. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  Johan T den Dunnen,et al.  Three genome-wide association studies and a linkage analysis identify HERC2 as a human iris color gene. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  P. Gill,et al.  Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[14]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes , 2000 .

[15]  R. Wu,et al.  Mapping shape quantitative trait loci using a radius-centroid-contour model , 2013, Heredity.

[16]  Dirk Vandermeulen,et al.  Objective 3D face recognition: Evolution, approaches and challenges. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[17]  D. Vandermeulen,et al.  Spatially-dense 3D facial asymmetry assessment in both typical and disordered growth , 2011, Journal of anatomy.

[18]  John M. Butler,et al.  Forensic DNA Typing: Biology, Technology, and Genetics of STR Markers , 2001 .

[19]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue depths: methodology and validation. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[20]  Cedric Gondro,et al.  Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Prediction , 2013, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[21]  Paul Suetens,et al.  A spatially-dense regression study of facial form and tissue depth: towards an interactive tool for craniofacial reconstruction. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[22]  D. Vandermeulen,et al.  Computerized craniofacial reconstruction: Conceptual framework and review. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[23]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Bayesian estimation of optimal craniofacial reconstructions. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[24]  Peter M Schneider,et al.  DNA-based prediction of human externally visible characteristics in forensics: motivations, scientific challenges, and ethical considerations. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[25]  A. Cecile J.W. Janssens,et al.  Eye color and the prediction of complex phenotypes from genotypes , 2009, Current Biology.

[26]  Peter Hammond,et al.  The use of 3D face shape modelling in dysmorphology , 2007, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[27]  Dirk Vandermeulen,et al.  Targeting specific facial variation for different identification tasks. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[28]  K. Lai,et al.  Application of biometric technologies in biomedical systems , 2014, The 10th International Conference on Digital Technologies 2014.

[29]  Nicholas J Timpson,et al.  Genome-wide association study of three-dimensional facial morphology identifies a variant in PAX3 associated with nasion position. , 2012, American journal of human genetics.

[30]  Guifang Fu,et al.  Shape mapping: genetic mapping meets geometric morphometrics , 2014, Briefings Bioinform..

[31]  Peter Hammond,et al.  Face shape differs in phylogenetically related populations , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[32]  Mark D. Shriver,et al.  Molecular Photofitting: Predicting Ancestry and Phenotype Using DNA , 2007 .

[33]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Caricature Effects, Distinctiveness, and Identification: Testing the Face-Space Framework , 2000, Psychological science.

[34]  Hang Zhou,et al.  Detecting Genetic Association of Common Human Facial Morphological Variation Using High Density 3D Image Registration , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  Siby Abraham,et al.  A Facial Caricature Generation system using Adaptive Thresholding , 2011, 2011 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies.

[36]  Wiro J Niessen,et al.  Genetic determination of human facial morphology: links between cleft-lips and normal variation , 2011, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[37]  S Hollander,et al.  Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[38]  Carl N. Stephan The accuracy of facial “reconstruction”: a review of the published data and their interpretive value , 2009 .

[39]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[40]  Paul Suetens,et al.  A Comparative Study of 3-D Face Recognition Under Expression Variations , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[41]  B Budowle,et al.  CODIS STR loci data from 41 sample populations. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[42]  Caroline Wilkinson,et al.  Facial reconstruction – anatomical art or artistic anatomy? , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[43]  L. Kohn,et al.  THE ROLE OF GENETICS IN CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY AND GROWTH , 1991 .

[44]  John M. Butler,et al.  Forensic DNA typing : biology & technology behind STR markers , 2001 .

[45]  G. Verbeke,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3D facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics , 2012, Journal of anatomy.

[46]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[47]  Peter Claes,et al.  How Different is Different? Criterion and Sensitivity in Face-Space , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[48]  Carl N Stephan,et al.  The reproducibility of facial approximation accuracy results generated from photo-spread tests. , 2010, Forensic science international.