Capturing metastable structures during high-rate cycling of LiFePO4 nanoparticle electrodes

Introduction The ability to achieve high cycling rates in a lithium-ion battery is limited by the Li transport within the electrolyte; the transport of Li ions and electrons within the electrodes; and, when a phase transformation is induced as a result of the Li compositional changes within an electrode, the nucleation and growth of the second phase. The absence of a phase transformation involving substantial structural rearrangements and large volume changes is generally considered to be key for achieving high rates. This assumption has been challenged by the discovery that some nanoparticulate electrode materials, most notably LiFePO4, can be cycled in a battery at very high rates, even though they cycle between two phases during battery operation. This apparent contradiction has been reconciled by the hypothesis that a nonequilibrium solid solution can be formed during reaction to bypass the nucleation step. Phase transformation from LiFePO4 (blue) to FePO4 (red). The delithiation (indicated by yellow arrows) proceeds at high rates via the formation of a nonequilibrium solid solution phase LixFePO4 (intermediate purple color), avoiding a classical nucleation process (indicated by dashed arrows). When the reaction is interrupted, the particles relax into the equilibrium configuration (shaded region), where only single-phase particles of LiFePO4 and/or FePO4 are present. Rationale To test this proposal, in situ techniques with high temporal resolution must be used to capture the fast phase transformation processes. We performed in situ synchrotron x-ray diffraction (XRD), which readily detects the structural changes and allows for fast data collection, on a LiFePO4-Li battery at high cycling rates, conditions that are able to drive the system away from equilibrium. We used an electrode comprising ~190-nm LiFePO4 particles, carbon, and binder (30:60:10 weight %), along with an electrochemical cell designed to yield reproducible results over multiple cycles, even at high rates. The high carbon content ensures that the reaction at high rates is not limited by either the electronic conductivity or ionic diffusion within the electrode composite. We compared the experimental results with simulated XRD patterns, in which the effects of strain versus compositional variation were explored. We then adapted a whole-pattern fitting method to quantify the compositional variation in the electrode during cycling. Results The XRD patterns, collected during high-rate galvanostatic cycling, show the expected disappearance of LiFePO4 Bragg reflections on charge and the simultaneous formation of FePO4 reflections. In addition, the development of positive intensities between the LiFePO4 and FePO4 reflections indicates that particles with lattice parameters that deviate from the equilibrium values of LiFePO4 and FePO4 are formed. The phenomenon is more pronounced at high currents. Detailed simulations of the XRD patterns reveal that this lattice-parameter variation cannot be explained by a LiFePO4-FePO4 interface within the particles, unless the size of the interface is similar to or greater than the size of the entire particle. Instead, the results indicate compositional variation either within or between particles. Conclusion The results demonstrate the formation of a nonequilibrium solid solution phase, LixFePO4 (0 < x < 1), during high-rate cycling, with compositions that span the entire composition between two thermodynamic phases, LiFePO4 and FePO4. This confirms the hypothesis that phase transformations in nanoparticulate LiFePO4 proceed, at least at high rates, via a continuous change in structure rather than a distinct moving phase boundary between LiFePO4 and FePO4. The ability of LiFePO4 to transform via a nonequilibrium single-phase solid solution, which avoids major structural rearrangement across a moving interface, helps to explain its high-rate performance despite a large Li miscibility gap at room temperature. The creation of a low-energy nonequilibrium path by, for example, particle size reduction or cation doping should enable the high-rate capabilities of other phase-transforming electrode materials. Watching battery materials in action When batteries get rapidly charged and discharged repeatedly, they will often stop working. This is especially true when the cycling changes the crystal structure of the battery components. Liu et al. examined the structural changes in components of a type of lithium battery (see the Perspective by Owen and Hector). Their findings explain why LiFePO4 delivers unexpectedly good electrochemical performances, particularly during rapid cycling. Science, this issue p. 10.1126/science.1252817; see also p. 1451 X-ray diffraction reveals that metastable solid solution reactions undergird the high-rate capability of LiFePO4 electrodes. [Also see Perspective by Owen and Hector] The absence of a phase transformation involving substantial structural rearrangements and large volume changes is generally considered to be a key characteristic underpinning the high-rate capability of any battery electrode material. In apparent contradiction, nanoparticulate LiFePO4, a commercially important cathode material, displays exceptionally high rates, whereas its lithium-composition phase diagram indicates that it should react via a kinetically limited, two-phase nucleation and growth process. Knowledge concerning the equilibrium phases is therefore insufficient, and direct investigation of the dynamic process is required. Using time-resolved in situ x-ray powder diffraction, we reveal the existence of a continuous metastable solid solution phase during rapid lithium extraction and insertion. This nonequilibrium facile phase transformation route provides a mechanism for realizing high-rate capability of electrode materials that operate via two-phase reactions.

[1]  Rahul Malik,et al.  Kinetics of non-equilibrium lithium incorporation in LiFePO4. , 2011, Nature materials.

[2]  Byoungwoo Kang,et al.  Battery materials for ultrafast charging and discharging , 2009, Nature.

[3]  Bernard Lestriez,et al.  Heterogeneous behaviour of the lithium battery composite electrode LiFePO4 , 2013 .

[4]  J. Choi,et al.  Factors that Affect the Phase Behavior of Multi-Component Olivine (LiFexMnyCo1-x-yPO4; 0 < x, y< 1) in Lithium Rechargeable Batteries: One-Phase Reaction vs. Two-Phase Reaction , 2013 .

[5]  M. Calleja,et al.  Colossal Positive and Negative Thermal Expansion in the Framework Material Ag3[Co(CN)6] , 2008, Science.

[6]  Thomas J. Richardson,et al.  Electron Microscopy Study of the LiFePO4 to FePO4 Phase Transition , 2006 .

[7]  T. R. Jow,et al.  Analysis of the FePO4 to LiFePO4 phase transition , 2008 .

[8]  J. E. Hilliard,et al.  Free Energy of a Nonuniform System. I. Interfacial Free Energy , 1958 .

[9]  Alain Mauger,et al.  Study of the Li-insertion/extraction process in LiFePO4/FePO4 , 2009 .

[10]  P. Rudman An X‐ray diffraction method for the determination of composition distribution in inhomogeneous binary solid solutions , 1960 .

[11]  Karim Zaghib,et al.  The phase transition behaviors of Li1−xMn0.5Fe0.5PO4 during lithium extraction studied by in situ X-ray absorption and diffraction techniques , 2009 .

[12]  C. Ionica-Bousquet,et al.  Operando 57Fe Mössbauer and XRD investigation of LixMnyFe1-yPO4/C composites (y = 0.50; 0.75) , 2012 .

[13]  A. Yamada,et al.  Phase Diagram of Li x ( Mn y Fe1 − y ) PO 4 ( 0 ⩽ x , y ⩽ 1 ) , 2001 .

[14]  J. Krumhansl,et al.  Twin Boundaries in Ferroelastic Media without Interface Dislocations , 1984 .

[15]  W. Craig Carter,et al.  Size-Dependent Lithium Miscibility Gap in Nanoscale Li1 − x FePO4 , 2007 .

[16]  Charles Delacourt,et al.  Study of the LiFePO4/FePO4 Two-Phase System by High-Resolution Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy , 2006 .

[17]  N. Sharma,et al.  Direct evidence of concurrent solid-solution and two-phase reactions and the nonequilibrium structural evolution of LiFePO4. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  Xiao‐Qing Yang,et al.  Correlating Capacity Fading and Structural Changes in Li1 + y Mn2 − y O 4 − δ Spinel Cathode Materials: A Systematic Study on the Effects of Li/Mn Ratio and Oxygen Deficiency , 2001 .

[19]  Marnix Wagemaker,et al.  Dynamic solubility limits in nanosized olivine LiFePO4. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  Glenn G. Amatucci,et al.  Synthesis and Characterization of Nanostructured 4.7 V Li x Mn1.5Ni0.5O4 Spinels for High-Power Lithium-Ion Batteries , 2006 .

[21]  J. L. Dodd,et al.  Phase Diagram of Li_xFePO_4 , 2006 .

[22]  Y. Orikasa,et al.  Direct observation of a metastable crystal phase of Li(x)FePO4 under electrochemical phase transition. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  J. L. Dodd,et al.  Phase diagram of LixFePO4 , 2006 .

[24]  Xiao‐Qing Yang,et al.  In situ X-ray absorption and diffraction studies of carbon coated LiFe1/4Mn1/4Co1/4Ni1/4PO4 cathode during first charge , 2009 .

[25]  G. Ceder,et al.  Architecture Dependence on the Dynamics of Nano-LiFePO4 Electrodes , 2014 .

[26]  Daniel A. Cogswell,et al.  Suppression of phase separation in LiFePO₄ nanoparticles during battery discharge. , 2011, Nano letters.

[27]  M. Järvinen Application of symmetrized harmonics expansion to correction of the preferred orientation effect , 1993 .

[28]  Jean-Marie Tarascon,et al.  The existence of a temperature-driven solid solution in LixFePO4 for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 , 2005 .

[29]  Jian Yu Huang,et al.  In Situ Atomic‐Scale Imaging of Phase Boundary Migration in FePO4 Microparticles During Electrochemical Lithiation , 2013, Advanced materials.

[30]  E. F. Rauch,et al.  Confirmation of the domino-cascade model by lifepo4/fepo 4 precession electron diffraction , 2011 .

[31]  Kyle R Fenton,et al.  Intercalation pathway in many-particle LiFePO4 electrode revealed by nanoscale state-of-charge mapping. , 2013, Nano letters.

[32]  G. S. Pawley,et al.  Unit-cell refinement from powder diffraction scans , 1981 .

[33]  D. Guyomard,et al.  Ionic vs Electronic Power Limitations and Analysis of the Fraction of Wired Grains in LiFePO4 Composite Electrodes , 2010 .

[34]  K. Kang,et al.  Combined First‐Principle Calculations and Experimental Study on Multi‐Component Olivine Cathode for Lithium Rechargeable Batteries , 2009 .

[35]  Takashi Ida,et al.  Isolation of Solid Solution Phases in Size‐Controlled LixFePO4 at Room Temperature , 2009 .

[36]  J. Cabana,et al.  Cation ordering in Li[NixMnxCo(1-2x)] O2-layered cathode materials: A nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), pair distribution function, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and electrochemical study , 2007 .

[37]  K. S. Nanjundaswamy,et al.  Phospho‐olivines as Positive‐Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries , 1997 .

[38]  Tsutomu Ohzuku,et al.  Novel lithium insertion material of LiCo1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2 for advanced lithium-ion batteries , 2003 .

[39]  Y. Chiang,et al.  Extended solid solutions and coherent transformations in nanoscale olivine cathodes. , 2014, Nano letters.

[40]  K. Wiaderek,et al.  The AMPIX electrochemical cell: a versatile apparatus for in situ X-ray scattering and spectroscopic measurements , 2012 .

[41]  J. Molenda,et al.  Electrical conductivity and reaction with lithium of LiFe1−yMnyPO4 olivine-type cathode materials , 2007 .

[42]  T. Tyliszczak,et al.  High-resolution chemical analysis on cycled LiFePO4 battery electrodes using energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy , 2014 .

[43]  C. Delmas,et al.  Lithium deintercalation in LiFePO4 nanoparticles via a domino-cascade model. , 2008, Nature materials.

[44]  N. Popa Texture in Rietveld refinement , 1992 .

[45]  Y. Orikasa,et al.  Transient phase change in two phase reaction between LiFePO4 and FePO4 under battery operation , 2013 .