The rapid appearance of homostyly in a cultivated distylous population of Primula forbesii

Abstract Evolutionary breakdown from rigorous outbreeding to self‐fertilization frequently occurs in angiosperms. Since the pollinators are not necessary, self‐compatible populations often reduce investment in floral display characteristics and pollination reward. Primula forbesii is a biennial herb with distribution restricted to southwest China; it was initially a self‐incompatible distylous species, but after 20 years of artificial domestication, homostyly appeared. This change in style provides an ideal material to explore the time required for plant mating systems to adapt to new environmental changes and test whether flower attraction has reduced following transitions to selfing. We did a survey in wild populations of P. forbesii where its seeds were originally collected 20 years ago and recorded the floral morph frequencies and morphologies. The floral morphologies, self‐incompatibility, floral scent, and pollinator visitation between distyly and homostyly were compared in greenhouse. Floral morph frequencies of wild populations did not change, while the cultivated population was inclined to L‐morph and produced homostyly. Evidence from stigma papillae and pollen size supports the hypothesis that the homostyly possibly originated from mutations of large effect genes in distylous linkage region. Transitions to self‐compatible homostyly are accompanied by smaller corolla size, lower amounts of terpenoids, especially linalool and higher amounts of fatty acid derivatives. The main pollinators in the greenhouse were short‐tongued Apis cerana. However, homostyly had reduced visiting frequency. The mating system of P. forbesii changed rapidly in just about 20 years of domestication, and our findings confirm the hypothesis that the transition to selfing is accompanied by decreased flower attraction.

[1]  S. Barrett,et al.  Evolutionary breakdown of distyly to homostyly is accompanied by reductions of floral scent in Primula oreodoxa , 2022, Journal of Systematics and Evolution.

[2]  M. Lenhard,et al.  Female self-incompatibility type in heterostylous Primula is determined by the brassinosteroid-inactivating cytochrome P450 CYP734A50 , 2021, Current Biology.

[3]  J. Shao,et al.  Evolution of Autonomous Selfing in Marginal Habitats: Spatiotemporal Variation in the Floral Traits of the Distylous Primula wannanensis , 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[4]  Z. Su,et al.  Chemical analysis of floral scents in sympatric Ficus species: highlighting different compositions of floral scents in morphologically and phylogenetically close species , 2021, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[5]  M. Friberg,et al.  Evolution of floral scent in relation to self-incompatibility and capacity for autonomous self-pollination in the perennial herb Arabis alpina , 2021, Annals of botany.

[6]  M. Mescher,et al.  Inbreeding in Solanum carolinense alters floral attractants and rewards and adversely affects pollinator visitation. , 2021, American journal of botany.

[7]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Phylogenomic analysis reveals multiple evolutionary origins of selfing from outcrossing in a lineage of heterostylous plants. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[8]  S. Barrett 'A most complex marriage arrangement': recent advances on heterostyly and unresolved questions. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[9]  A. Golonka,et al.  Floral Scent Variation in the Heterostylous Species Gelsemium sempervirens , 2019, Molecules.

[10]  E. Conti,et al.  Intraspecific variation of self-incompatibility in the distylous plant Primula merrilliana. , 2019, AoB PLANTS.

[11]  J. Shao,et al.  Pollen morphological variation of Primula merrilliana and its systematic significance , 2019, Flora.

[12]  D. Levin,et al.  Losing a Scent of One’s Self: Is There a Reduction in Floral Scent Emission in Self-Pollinating Phlox cuspidata versus Outcrossing Phlox drummondii? , 2019, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[13]  Qixiang Zhang,et al.  Transcriptomics Investigation into the Mechanisms of Self-Incompatibility between Pin and Thrum Morphs of Primula maximowiczii , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[14]  X. Li,et al.  Genetics of distyly and homostyly in a self-compatible Primula , 2018, Heredity.

[15]  M. Lenhard,et al.  A short story gets longer: recent insights into the molecular basis of heterostyly. , 2017, Journal of experimental botany.

[16]  P. Meirmans,et al.  Outbreeding depression and breeding system evolution in small, remnant populations of Primula vulgaris: consequences for genetic rescue , 2017, Conservation Genetics.

[17]  S. Barrett,et al.  Ecological correlates and genetic consequences of evolutionary transitions from distyly to homostyly , 2017, Annals of botany.

[18]  X. Zhang,et al.  Floral morphology and hybrid fruiting characteristics of distylous Primula forbesii , 2017 .

[19]  D. Schoen,et al.  Transitions from distyly to homostyly are associated with floral evolution in the buckwheat genus (Fagopyrum). , 2017, American journal of botany.

[20]  Qing‐Jun Li,et al.  Self‐ and intra‐morph incompatibility and selection analysis of an inconspicuous distylous herb growing on the Tibetan plateau (Primula tibetica) , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[21]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Phylogeographic insights on the evolutionary breakdown of heterostyly. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[22]  F. Schiestl,et al.  Real-time divergent evolution in plants driven by pollinators , 2017, Nature Communications.

[23]  M. Lenhard,et al.  Repeated Inactivation of the First Committed Enzyme Underlies the Loss of Benzaldehyde Emission after the Selfing Transition in Capsella , 2016, Current Biology.

[24]  D. Swarbreck,et al.  Genetic architecture and evolution of the S locus supergene in Primula vulgaris , 2016, Nature Plants.

[25]  Zongxin Ren,et al.  Reproductive biology of Primula beesiana (Primulaceae), an alpine species endemic to Southwest China , 2015 .

[26]  D. Carr,et al.  Variation in reward quality and pollinator attraction: the consumer does not always get it right , 2015, AoB PLANTS.

[27]  Dianxiang Zhang,et al.  Distyly and cryptic heteromorphic self‐incompatibility in Mussaenda macrophylla (Rubiaceae) , 2015 .

[28]  R. Brys,et al.  Disruption of the distylous syndrome in Primula veris. , 2015, Annals of botany.

[29]  H. Bradshaw,et al.  Floral volatile alleles can contribute to pollinator-mediated reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). , 2014, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[30]  D. Carr,et al.  Inbreeding in Mimulus guttatus Reduces Visitation by Bumble Bee Pollinators , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  A. Haddadchi,et al.  Self-compatibility and floral traits adapted for self-pollination allow homostylous Nymphoidesgeminata (Menyanthaceae) to persist in marginal habitats , 2014, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[32]  Rafael O. Wüest,et al.  SMALL AND UGLY? PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE “SELFING SYNDROME” REVEAL COMPLEX EVOLUTIONARY FATES OF MONOMORPHIC PRIMROSE FLOWERS , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  R. Raguso,et al.  Dramatic vestigialization of floral fragrance across a transition from outcrossing to selfing in Abronia umbellata (Nyctaginaceae). , 2013, American journal of botany.

[34]  J. Arroyo,et al.  DECONSTRUCTING HETEROSTYLY: THE EVOLUTIONARY ROLE OF INCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEM, POLLINATORS, AND FLORAL ARCHITECTURE , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  S. Kalisz,et al.  Evolutionary consequences of self-fertilization in plants , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Floral volatile organic compounds: Between attraction and deterrence of visitors under global change , 2013 .

[37]  A. Kessler,et al.  Natural selection on floral volatile production in Penstemon digitalis: Highlighting the role of linalool , 2013, Plant signaling & behavior.

[38]  E. Conti,et al.  Reproductive implications of herkogamy in homostylous primroses: variation during anthesis and reproductive assurance in alpine environments , 2012 .

[39]  J. Busch,et al.  The relative importance of reproductive assurance and automatic selection as hypotheses for the evolution of self-fertilization. , 2012, Annals of botany.

[40]  A. Naiki Heterostyly and the possibility of its breakdown by polyploidization , 2012 .

[41]  M. Lenhard,et al.  The selfing syndrome: a model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. , 2011, Annals of botany.

[42]  K. Idzikowska,et al.  Morphological differentiation of Primula veris L. pollen from natural and cultivated populations , 2011 .

[43]  S. Dötterl,et al.  The chemical ecology and evolution of bee-flower interactions: a review and perspectives' , 2010 .

[44]  C. Darwin The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species: INTRODUCTION , 2010 .

[45]  Richard H. Ree,et al.  Correlated evolution of mating system and floral display traits in flowering plants and its implications for the distribution of mating system variation. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[46]  M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al.  Evolutionary pathways to self-fertilization in a tristylous plant species. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[47]  T. Ashman,et al.  The sweet smell of success: floral scent affects pollinator attraction and seed fitness in Hesperis matronalis , 2009 .

[48]  Ming-Lin Chen Comparative reproductive biology of Primula merrilliana Schltr. and P. cicutariifolia Pax , 2009, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[49]  M. Carlson,et al.  The Role of Reproductive Assurance in the Arctic: a Comparative Study of a Homostylous and Distylous Species Pair , 2008 .

[50]  J. Gershenzon,et al.  Diversity and distribution of floral scent , 2006, The Botanical Review.

[51]  S. Barrett,et al.  New Insights on Heterostyly: Comparative Biology, Ecology and Genetics , 2008 .

[52]  A. McCubbin Heteromorphic Self-Incompatibility In Primula: Twenty-First Century Tools Promise To Unravel A Classic Nineteenth Century Model System , 2008 .

[53]  M. Ferrari,et al.  Inbreeding effects on blossom volatiles in Cucurbita pepo subsp. texana (Cucurbitaceae). , 2006, American journal of botany.

[54]  E. Conti,et al.  Are any primroses (Primula) primitively monomorphic? , 2006, The New phytologist.

[55]  D. A. Moeller Geographic structure of pollinator communities, reproductive assurance, and the evolution of self-pollination. , 2006, Ecology.

[56]  H. E. Dobson Relationship between Floral Fragrance Composition and Type of Pollinator , 2006 .

[57]  L. F. Delph,et al.  Effect of variation in herkogamy on outcrossing within a population of Gilia achilleifolia , 2006, Heredity.

[58]  L. Bohs,et al.  Ancient polymorphism reveals unidirectional breeding system shifts , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  D. Carr,et al.  Effects of herbivory and inbreeding on the pollinators and mating system of Mimulus guttatus (Phrymaceae). , 2005, American journal of botany.

[60]  E. Conti,et al.  Floral Odor Variation in Two Heterostylous Species of Primula , 2005, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[61]  L. Harder,et al.  Heteromorphic incompatibility and efficiency of pollination in two distylous Pentanisia species (Rubiaceae). , 2004, Annals of botany.

[62]  Alfred Ernst Self-fertility in monomorphic Primulas , 1955, Genetica.

[63]  J. Oostermeijer,et al.  Integrating demographic and genetic approaches in plant conservation , 2003 .

[64]  M. Johnston,et al.  Comparative floral morphometrics of distyly and homostyly in three evolutionary lineages of Amsinckia (Boraginaceae) , 2001 .

[65]  D. Laloi,et al.  Changes with age in olfactory conditioning performance of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) , 2001 .

[66]  C. Eckert,et al.  Tristyly, self-compatibility and floral variation in Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae) , 1994 .

[67]  S. Barrett,et al.  Incompatibility in heterostylous plants , 1994 .

[68]  R. Knox,et al.  Genetic control of self-incompatibility and reproductive development in flowering plants , 1994, Advances in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plants.

[69]  C. J. Webb,et al.  The Evolution of Heterostyly , 1992 .

[70]  S. Barrett Evolution and Function of Heterostyly , 1992, Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[71]  F. Wedderburn,et al.  Variation in within‐morph incompatibility inhibition sites in heteromorphic Primula L. , 1990 .

[72]  S. Barrett,et al.  VARIATION AND EVOLUTION OF BREEDING SYSTEMS IN THE TURNERA ULMIFOLIA L. COMPLEX (TURNERACEAE) , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[73]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Breeding system evolution in Primula vulgaris and the role of reproductive assurance , 1986, Heredity.

[74]  F. R. Ganders,et al.  Breeding systems and genetic variation in Amsinckia spectabilis (Boraginaceae) , 1985 .

[75]  F. R. Ganders The biology of heterostyly , 1979 .

[76]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The Maintenance and Breakdown of Distyly , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[77]  K. Mather,et al.  Adaptation and Counter-Adaptation of the Breeding System in Primula: THE NATURE OF BREEDING SYSTEMS , 1941 .

[78]  Xiang Shu,et al.  The Flora of China , 1889, Nature.

[79]  W. T. THISELTON DYER,et al.  The Effects of Cross- and Self-Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom , 1877, Nature.

[80]  Charles Darwin,et al.  The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom , 1972 .