Does Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Raise the Bar in Fistula Surgery?

BACKGROUND: The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure has been reported to have high cure rates, with minimal impairment of continence. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rates and functional outcome after the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure. DESIGN: This study was performed as a retrospective review. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota and at affiliated hospitals in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota, between March 2007 and September 2011. PATIENTS: Ninety-three patients with transsphincteric cryptoglandular anal fistula were included. INTERVENTIONS: Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure was defined as persistent or recurrent drainage, air leakage from a patent external opening, or intersphincteric incision or reoperation for recurrent fistula. Success was defined as healing of the external fistula opening and intersphincteric incision. Patients were followed up with a questionnaire to assess the recurrence rate and the Wexner incontinence score. RESULTS: The median follow-up time for was 19 months (range, 4–55). Thirty patients (32%) had a history of previous surgery for their fistula. The success rate of fistula healing was 40% after the first ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure. When including patients with repeat ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract and subsequent intersphincteric fistulotomy after ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract repair, the success rates were 47% and 57%. Patients with successful fistula closure reported a mean Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence score of 1.0 (SD 2.3). No predictor for successful fistula closure was found. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, limited accuracy of diagnosing fistula failure, and lack of baseline continence were limitations of this study. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure for transsphincteric fistulas has a significant risk for failure but good functional outcome in patients with no recurrence.

[1]  I. Skinner,et al.  Managing fistula‐in‐ano with ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure: the Western Hospital experience , 2012, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[2]  K. Tan,et al.  The Anatomy of Failures Following the Ligation of Intersphincteric Tract Technique for Anal Fistula: A Review of 93 Patients Over 4 Years , 2011, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[3]  A. Kaji,et al.  Early Result of Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract for Fistula-in-Ano , 2011, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[4]  B. Champagne,et al.  Tract Length Predicts Successful Closure With Anal Fistula Plug in Cryptoglandular Fistulas , 2010, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[5]  J. Rostas,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes With the Use of Bioprosthetic Plugs for the Management of Complex Anal Fistulas , 2010, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[6]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract: An Effective New Technique for Complex Fistulas , 2010, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[7]  N. Amri,et al.  Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT): A Sphincter-Saving Technique for Fistula-in-Ano , 2010, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[8]  A. Mellgren,et al.  Treatment of Transsphincteric Anal Fistulas by Endorectal Advancement Flap or Collagen Fistula Plug: A Comparative Study , 2009, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[9]  C. N. Ellis,et al.  Outcomes After Repair of Rectovaginal Fistulas Using Bioprosthetics , 2008, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[10]  C. Sahakitrungruang,et al.  Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. , 2007, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[11]  O. Zmora,et al.  Endorectal Advancement Flap , 2002, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[12]  T. Sonoda,et al.  Outcomes of Primary Repair of Anorectal and Rectovaginal Fistulas Using the Endorectal Advancement Flap , 2002, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[13]  H. Ortiz,et al.  Endorectal flap advancement repair and fistulectomy for high trans‐sphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas , 2000, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  R. Pearl,et al.  Repair of fistulas-in-ano using fibrin adhesive , 2000, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[15]  J. Briel,et al.  Transanal advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas , 1999, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[16]  K. Venkatesh,et al.  Fibrin glue application in the treatment of recurrent anorectal fistulas , 1999, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[17]  J. Garcia-Aguilar,et al.  Cutting seton versus two‐stage seton fistulotomy in the surgical management of high anal fistula , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  P. Lunniss,et al.  Total sphincter conservation in high fistula in ano: Results of a new approach , 1993, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  S. Wexner,et al.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence , 1993, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[20]  J. Williams,et al.  Seton treatment of high anal fistulae , 1991, The British journal of surgery.