Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear--floor friction conditions.

A study on combined manual materials-handling tasks performed on floors under three friction levels was conducted. Eight male subjects participated in the study. The maximum acceptable weight of handling, including lifting, carrying for 3m, lowering, and walking 3m back at twice per minute was determined. The subject then performed the same tasks for 10 min. Heart rate, Vo2, energy efficiency, perceived sense of slip, and rating of perceived exertion for whole body strain were measured. The results showed that the effects of friction level on the maximum acceptable weights of handling, perceived sense of slip, Vo2, and energy efficiency were statistically significant (p<or=0.0006). As the friction level increased from low to high, the maximum acceptable weights of handling increased from 8.15 to 9.34 kg. The energy efficiency on the low friction condition (12.58 kg/L/min) was significantly lower than those of the medium (15.73 kg/L/min) and high (15.38 kg/L/min) friction conditions. The perceived sense of slip was the highest (5.44) on the low-friction condition, followed by the medium-friction condition (3.58), and last the high-friction condition (1.84). The implication of this study was that friction level should be regarded as one of the major environmental factors in designing MMH tasks as it affected both physiological and psychophysical responses of the subjects. Low-friction footwear-floor interface should be avoided as it resulted in not only high scores of perceived sense of slip but also in low-energy efficiency utilized in the body.

[1]  James M. Miller,et al.  "Slippery" work surfaces: Towards a performance definition and quantitative coefficient of friction criteria , 1983 .

[2]  Yueng-Hsiang Huang,et al.  Assessing floor slipperiness in fast-food restaurants in Taiwan using objective and subjective measures. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  R E Schlegel,et al.  Coefficient of Friction and Subjective Assessment of Slippery Work Surfaces , 1992, Human factors.

[4]  Stover H. Snook,et al.  Survey of manual handling tasks , 1999 .

[5]  Swei-Pi Wu,et al.  Effects of the adjustment period on psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weight of lift and the physiological cost , 2003 .

[6]  James L. Smith,et al.  Subjective assessment of floor slipperiness , 1993 .

[7]  Stover H. Snook,et al.  Distributions of manual materials handling task parameters , 1999 .

[8]  A Bhattacharya,et al.  Evaluation of workers' perceived sense of slip and effect of prior knowledge of slipperiness during task performance on slippery surfaces. , 2000, AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[9]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  The Effect of Handle Angle on MAWL, Wrist Posture, RPE, and Heart Rate , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[10]  A. Garg,et al.  Maximum acceptable weights and maximum voluntary isometric strengths for asymmetric lifting. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[11]  A. Garg,et al.  Maximum acceptable weights, heart rates and RPEs for one hour's repetitive asymmetric lifting. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[12]  S H Snook,et al.  Psychophysical considerations in permissible loads. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[13]  S H Snook,et al.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[14]  R. Cham,et al.  Heel contact dynamics during slip events on level and inclined surfaces , 2002 .

[15]  A Mital Psychophysical capacity of industrial workers for lifting symmetrical and asymmetrical loads symmetrically and asymmetrically for 8 h work shifts. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[16]  R Myung,et al.  The effect of load carrying and floor contaminants on slip and fall parameters. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[17]  Stover H. Snook,et al.  The Ergonomics Society The Society's Lecture 1978. THE DESIGN OF MANUAL HANDLING TASKS , 1978 .

[18]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[19]  M J Wang,et al.  The effects of container design and stair climbing on maximal acceptable lift weight, wrist posture, psychophysical, and physiological responses in wafer-handling tasks. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  Wen-Ruey Chang,et al.  Floor slipperiness measurement: friction coefficient, roughness of floors, and subjective perception under spillage conditions , 2004 .

[21]  Roger Haslam,et al.  Maximum acceptable loads for pushing and pulling on floor surfaces with good and reduced resistance to slipping , 2002 .

[22]  U. Saxena,et al.  Maximum frequency acceptable to female workers for one-handed lifts in the horizontal plane , 1982 .

[23]  Arun Garg,et al.  Container Characteristics and Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift1 , 1980 .

[24]  Y H Lee,et al.  The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[25]  Raoul Grönqvist,et al.  Mechanisms of friction and assessment of slip resistance of new and used footwear soles on contaminated floors. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[26]  Raymond W. McGorry,et al.  Maximum acceptable horizontal and vertical forces of dynamic pushing on high and low coefficient of friction floors , 2001 .

[27]  Anil Mital,et al.  Manual Materials Handling , 1989 .

[28]  R. Cham,et al.  Lower extremity corrective reactions to slip events. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.