It has been discussed in the recent literature that every Wh-question in Japanese must be accompanied by an appropriate prosodic (pitch) contour. Deguchi and Kitagawa (2002) and Ishihara (2003) point out that, for the speakers of Tokyo Japanese, the Wh-scope domain of a sentence correlates with the domain of focus prosody (henceforth FPD). The two alternative Wh-scope readings in (1) below contrast in the end position of FPD wherein the Wh-focus receives pitch prominence (indicated by bold-face capitals), followed by post-focal pitch-range reduction (henceforth PFR; indicated by a shade). The end of FPD is marked by post-COMP F0 rise (whose high tones indicated by capitals). This rise occurs at the matrix verb (e.g., tasikameta “confirmed”) in (1a) for subordinate Wh-scope, while no such rise takes place for matrix Wh-scope, and hence PFR continues through the sentence-final matrix Q-COMP in (1b). We will refer to the former prosodic pattern as "Local" FPD and the latter pattern as "Global" FPD.
[1]
Haruo Kubozono,et al.
Focus and Intonation in Japanese: Does Focus Trigger Pitch Reset? *
,
2005
.
[2]
Yoshihisa Kitagawa,et al.
PROSODY, SYNTAX AND PRAGMATICS OF WH-QUESTIONS IN JAPANESE
,
2005
.
[3]
Marica de Vincenzi,et al.
Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian
,
1991
.
[4]
Yoshihisa Kitagawa,et al.
Production-Perception Asymmetry in Wh-scope Marking1
,
2010
.
[5]
Lyn Frazier,et al.
Sentence processing: A tutorial review.
,
1987
.
[6]
S. Ishihara.
Intonation and interface conditions
,
2003
.
[7]
A. Watanabe.
Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ
,
1992
.
[8]
Taisuke Nishigauchi,et al.
Quantification in the theory of grammar
,
1990
.