In vitro and in vivo degradation of bioabsorbable PLLA spinal fusion cages.

The in vitro and in vivo degradation of poly-L-lactic acid cages used as an adjunct to spinal arthrodesis was investigated. In the in vitro experiments cages were subjected to aging up to 73 weeks in phosphate-buffered solution (pH 7.4) at 37 degrees C. Inherent viscosity, crystallinity, and mechanical strength were determined at different time points. In the in vivo study, the poly-L-lactic acid cages were packed with bone graft and implanted in the L3-L4 spinal motion segment of 18 Dutch milk goats. At 12, 26, and 52 weeks, the motion segments were isolated and poly-L-lactic acid samples retrieved. On evaluation, the in vivo implanted cages showed an advanced decline in inherent viscosity compared to the cages subjected to in vitro degradation experiments. At 6 months of implantation, the geometrical shape and original height of 10 mm was maintained during 6 months of follow up. This finding fits well with the observation that mechanical strength was maintained for a period of 6 months in vitro. At 12 months, the poly-L-lactic acid cage had been disintegrated into multiple fragments with signs of absorption. Despite the high-load-bearing conditions, the poly-L-lactic acid cage allowed interbody fusion to occur without collapse of the cage.

[1]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Tissue Reaction of Bioabsorbable Ultra High Strength Poly (L‐Lactide) Rod: A Long‐Term Study in Rabbits , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  Martijn van Dijk,et al.  The Effect of Cage Stiffness on the Rate of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An In Vivo Model Using Poly(L-Lactic Acid) and Titanium Cages , 2002, Spine.

[3]  F. Quereshy,et al.  The efficacy of bioresorbable fixation in the repair of mandibular fractures: an animal study. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[4]  W C de Bruijn,et al.  Late degradation tissue response to poly(L-lactide) bone plates and screws. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[5]  K. Kaneda,et al.  In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  T. Tullberg,et al.  Failure of a Carbon Fiber Implant: A Case Report , 1998, Spine.

[7]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Compression strength of donor bone for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 1993, Spine.

[8]  Y Ikada,et al.  In vitro and in vivo studies on bioabsorbable ultra-high-strength poly(L-lactide) rods. , 1992, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  M. Aebi,et al.  Posterolateral and Anterior Interbody Spinal Fusion Models in the Sheep , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  D. Sengupta,et al.  Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases. , 1999, Spine.

[11]  P. McAfee,et al.  Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: minimally invasive spine surgery. A prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion. , 1999, Spine.

[12]  O. Böstman,et al.  Bioabsorbable fixation in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[13]  S. L. Griffith,et al.  Revision strategies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages. , 1999, Spine.

[14]  D. Williams,et al.  Mechanisms of polymer degradation in implantable devices. 2. Poly(DL-lactic acid). , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Distractive Properties of a Threaded Interbody Fusion Device: An In Vivo Model , 1996, Spine.

[16]  T. Waris,et al.  SR-PLLA and SR-PGA miniscrews: biodegradation and tissue reactions in the calvarium and dura mater. , 1999, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[17]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Interbody Lumbar Fusion Using a Carbon Fiber Cage Implant Versus Allograft Bone: An Investigational Study in the Spanish Goat , 1994, Spine.

[18]  O. Böstman,et al.  Absorbable pins of self-reinforced poly-L-lactic acid for fixation of fractures and osteotomies. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  G. Bagby Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant. , 1988, Orthopedics.

[20]  T. Smit The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine – biomechanical considerations , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[21]  C D Ray,et al.  Threaded Titanium Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusions , 1997, Spine.

[22]  P. Törmälä,et al.  Treatment of subcapital femoral neck fractures with bioabsorbable or metallic screw fixation. A preliminary report. , 2000, Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae.

[23]  P. McAfee,et al.  Minimally Invasive Anterior Retroperitoneal Approach to the Lumbar Spine: Emphasis on the Lateral BAK , 1998, Spine.

[24]  S. L. Griffith,et al.  The Bagby and Kuslich Method of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: History, Techniques, and 2‐Year Follow‐up Results of a United States Prospective, Multicenter Trial , 1998, Spine.

[25]  N. Chegini,et al.  A comparative scanning electron microscopic study on degradation of absorbable ligating clips in vivo and in vitro. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[26]  R. Suuronen,et al.  Biodegradable polylactide plates and screws in orthognathic surgery: technical note. , 1998, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[27]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Osteogenic protein versus autologous interbody arthrodesis in the sheep thoracic spine. A comparative endoscopic study using the Bagby and Kuslich interbody fusion device. , 1999, Spine.

[28]  P. Patka,et al.  Resorbierbare Implantate für Frakturfixierungen, aktueller Stand , 2000, Der Unfallchirurg.

[29]  J Mühling,et al.  Poly(L-lactide): a long-term degradation study in vivo. Part III. Analytical characterization. , 1993, Biomaterials.

[30]  J. Brantigan,et al.  A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. , 1993 .

[31]  S. Agazzi,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages: an independent review of 71 cases. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[32]  P. McAfee Interbody fusion cages in reconstructive operations on the spine. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  J. Evans Biomechanics of lumbar fusion. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  G. Entenmann,et al.  Resorbable polyesters: composition, properties, applications. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[35]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Effect of in vivo and in vitro degradation on molecular and mechanical properties of various low-molecular-weight polylactides. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[36]  D. Williams,et al.  Mechanisms of biodegradation of implantable polymers. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[37]  R C Edwards,et al.  The fate of resorbable poly-L-lactic/polyglycolic acid (LactoSorb) bone fixation devices in orthognathic surgery. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[38]  B. Weiner,et al.  Lumbar Interbody Cages , 1998, Spine.

[39]  F W Cordewener,et al.  The future of biodegradable osteosyntheses. , 2000, Tissue engineering.

[40]  Peter S. Donzelli,et al.  Real-Time In Vivo Loading in the Lumbar Spine: Part 1. Interbody Implant: Load Cell Design and Preliminary Results , 2000, Spine.