Comparing apples and oranges?: trends in IVC simulations

Looking back at recent years in Inter-Vehicle Communication (IVC) research, tremendous improvements in precision and realism of simulation models concerning all its aspects can be observed. These models offer a vast number of parameters, enabling investigations of a huge variety of different scenarios. Reviewing simulation studies published at major vehicular network conferences from 2009 to 2011, we reflect on the impact of these developments. We are glad to present a clear trend to conduct simulations based on a consolidated set of established standards, models, and tools. However, looking at individual papers, we commonly find key information (such as the used model) missing. We argue that this trend threatens to compromise both the reproducibility and the comparability of simulations conducted, but acknowledge that space constraints often make it impossible to describe current, complex simulations in full. We hope that the presented commonly used basic building blocks of simulations can serve as first step towards deriving an agreed-upon set to base IVC simulations on and, thus, ultimately, help keep future research reproducible and comparable.

[1]  Reinhard German,et al.  A computationally inexpensive empirical model of IEEE 802.11p radio shadowing in urban environments , 2011, 2011 Eighth International Conference on Wireless On-Demand Network Systems and Services.

[2]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  Congestion and Awareness Control in Cooperative Vehicular Systems , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Krzysztof Pawlikowski,et al.  On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[4]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  Modeling and simulating ITS applications with iTETRIS , 2011, PM2HW2N '11.

[5]  Falko Dressler,et al.  On the Necessity of Accurate IEEE 802.11P Models for IVC Protocol Simulation , 2012, 2012 IEEE 75th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[6]  Ilja Radusch,et al.  simTD: a car-to-X system architecture for field operational tests [Topics in Automotive Networking] , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Giovanni Pau,et al.  CORNER: a realistic urban propagation model for VANET , 2010, 2010 Seventh International Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS).

[8]  Theodore L. Willke,et al.  A survey of inter-vehicle communication protocols and their applications , 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[9]  Amit Kumar Saha,et al.  Modeling mobility for vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2004, VANET '04.

[10]  Harsha Sirisena,et al.  Survey of simulators of Next Generation Networks for Studying Service Availability and Resilience , 2006 .

[11]  Javier Gozálvez,et al.  Impact of the radio channel modelling on the performance of VANET communication protocols , 2012, Telecommun. Syst..

[12]  Mate Boban,et al.  Impact of Vehicles as Obstacles in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[13]  Falko Dressler,et al.  Progressing toward realistic mobility models in VANET simulations , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Reinhard German,et al.  Bidirectionally Coupled Network and Road Traffic Simulation for Improved IVC Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.