Psycholinguistic and corpus-linguistic evidence for L2 constructions

In Construction Grammar, highly frequent syntactic configurations are assumed to be stored as symbolic units in the mental lexicon alongside words. Considering the example of gerund and infinitival complement constructions in English (She tried rocking the baby vs. She tried to rock the baby), this study combines corpus-linguistic and experimental evidence to investigate the question whether these patterns are also stored as constructions by German foreign language learners of English. In a corpus analysis based on 3,343 instances of the two constructions from the British component of the International Corpus of English, a distinctive collexeme analysis was computed to identify the verbs that distinguish best between the two constructions; these verbs were used as experimental stimuli in a sentence completion experiment and a sentence acceptability rating experiment. Two kinds of short-distance priming effects were investigated in the completion data: we checked how often subjects produced an ing-/to-/’other’-construction after having rated an ing- or to-construction (rating-to-production priming), and how often they produced an ing-/to-/’other’-construction when they had produced and ing- or to-construction in the directly preceding completion (production-to-production priming). Furthermore, we considered the proportion of to-completions before a completion in the questionnaire as a measure of a within-subject accumulative priming effect. We found no rating-to-production priming effects in the expected direction, but a weak effect in the opposite direction; short-distance production-to-production priming effects from ing to ing and from ‘other’ and to to to, and, on the whole at least, a suggestive accumulative production-to-production priming effect for both constructions. In the rating task, we found that subjects rate sentences better when the sentential structure is compatible with the main verb’s collexemic distinctiveness.

[1]  Michael H. Schwartz,et al.  THE ROLE OF FREQUENCY IN SLA: AN ANALYSIS OF GERUNDS AND INFINITIVES IN ESL WRITTEN DISCOURSE , 2007 .

[2]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? , 2003, Cognition.

[3]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The Return of Constructions , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[4]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition , 2008 .

[5]  H. Hughes The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2003 .

[6]  Randolph Quirk The linguist and the English language , 1974 .

[7]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Structural priming across languages , 2003 .

[8]  Irene Mazurkewich,et al.  The Acquisition of Infinitive and Gerund Complements by Second Language Learners , 1988 .

[9]  G. Rohdenburg,et al.  Determinants of grammatical variation in English , 2003 .

[10]  Christian Mair Gerundial complements after begin and start: Grammatical and sociolinguistic factors, and how they work against each other , 2003 .

[11]  Patricia K. Werner,et al.  Mosaic 2: Grammar , 2001 .

[12]  Leon A. Jakobovits,et al.  Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology , 1971 .

[13]  Hans Jürgen Ohlbach,et al.  Author ’ s Address , 2022 .

[14]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions , 2003 .

[15]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs , 1997 .

[16]  S. Gries,et al.  Do foreign language learners also have constructions , 2005 .

[17]  D. Larsen-Freeman,et al.  The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course , 1983 .

[18]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Structural priming: Purely syntactic? , 2020, Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[19]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[20]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition. , 1997 .

[21]  A. Goldberg Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[22]  D. Bolinger,et al.  语言要略 = Aspects of Language , 1968 .

[23]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[24]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Examining the role of lexical frequency in the acquisition and processing of sentential complements , 2006 .

[25]  Stefanie Wulff,et al.  Do foreign language learners also have constructions ? Evidence from priming , sorting , and corpora * , 2005 .

[26]  K. Bock,et al.  Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.

[27]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[28]  S. Gries,et al.  Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .

[29]  Sabine Schulte im Walde Experiments on the Automatic Induction of German Semantic Verb Classes , 2006, CL.

[30]  S. Gries,et al.  Some Proposals towards a More Rigorous Corpus Linguistics , 2006 .

[31]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning , 2000 .

[32]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[33]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Book Reviews: Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English , 2001, Computational Linguistics.

[34]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Chapter 19. Conclusion: Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition and L2 Instruction—Issues for Research , 2008 .

[35]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[37]  R. M. W. Dixon The Semantic Basis of Syntactic Properties , 1984 .

[38]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[39]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  USAGE-BASED AND FORM-FOCUSED LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 endstate , 2008 .