Assessing minimum environmental flows in nonpermanent rivers: The choice of thresholds

The criteria used in the computation of the minimum environmental flow regime and flow cessation periods in nonpermanent rivers are often left to open criteria. This study proposes a stochastic approach for evaluating the choice of local thresholds in the characterization of minimum environmental flows through both the Monte Carlo technique and local hydrological relationships. This approach is applied to four regimes obtained by hydrologic and hydraulic habitat modeling in a Mediterranean watershed. The operationality, defined as the probability of the calculated environmental regime being satisfied by the natural regime over 25 years, was assessed for eight different scenarios. Two monthly minimum environmental flow regimes were then generated, with 90 and 95% operationality levels. This analysis allows the generation of minimum flow regime prescriptions from a strictly hydrologic point of view. The methodology proposed constitutes a useful tool for the implementation of uncertainty analysis of environmental flows in water resource management. Minimum environmental flows are sensitive to thresholds applied in the calculations.We propose a stochastic approach for determining local thresholds.Optimization was applied to give prescriptions based on an operationality assessment.A tool for the uncertainty assessment required in risk analysis is provided.

[1]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Effect of rainfall‐sampling errors on simulations of desert flash floods , 1994 .

[2]  M. Zamorano,et al.  Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive: Integration of hydrological and regional planning at the Segura River Basin, southeast Spain , 2011 .

[3]  E. Douglas,et al.  An analysis of the allocation of Yakima River water in terms of sustainability and economic efficiency. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Ken D. Bovee,et al.  A guide to stream habitat analysis using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. IFIP No. 12 , 1982 .

[5]  Antonio Moñino,et al.  An energy balance snowmelt model in a Mediterranean site , 2009 .

[6]  J. L. Ayuso,et al.  Testing the relationship between instantaneous peak flow and mean daily flow in a Mediterranean Area Southeast Spain , 2008 .

[7]  Mike Acreman,et al.  Defining environmental river flow requirements ? a review , 2004 .

[8]  F. Martínez‐Capel,et al.  Hydrological Classification of Natural Flow Regimes to Support Environmental Flow Assessments in Intensively Regulated Mediterranean Rivers, Segura River Basin (Spain) , 2011, Environmental management.

[9]  Pavel Kabat,et al.  Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments , 2013 .

[10]  Brian Richter,et al.  Re‐thinking environmental flows: from allocations and reserves to sustainability boundaries , 2010 .

[11]  Ian G. Cowx,et al.  The changing role of ecohydrological science in guiding environmental flows , 2014 .

[12]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[13]  M. Losada,et al.  The hydrological response of baseflow in fractured mountain areas , 2009 .

[14]  F. Godinho,et al.  Integrated Procedure for Environmental Flow Assessment in Rivers , 2014, Environmental Processes.

[15]  David C. Garen,et al.  Spatially distributed energy balance snowmelt modelling in a mountainous river basin: estimation of meteorological inputs and verification of model results , 2005 .

[16]  M. Losada,et al.  Assessing risks for integrated water resource management: coping with uncertainty and the human factor , 2014 .

[17]  P. Breil,et al.  Hydrological impacts affecting endangered fish species: a Spanish case study , 2007 .

[18]  D. Marks,et al.  Methods for developing time-series climate surfaces to drive topographically distributed energy- and water-balance models , 1999 .

[19]  Rafael Muñoz-Mas,et al.  Application of Probabilistic Neural Networks to microhabitat suitability modelling for adult brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in Iberian rivers , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  Diego García de Jalón The Spanish Experience in Determining Minimum Flow Regimes in Regulated Streams , 2003 .

[21]  R. Tharme A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers , 2003 .

[22]  T. McMahon,et al.  Analysis of periodicity in streamflow and rainfall data by Colwell's indices , 1991 .

[23]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Resilience of river flow regimes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  M. Polo,et al.  Generating reference evapotranspiration surfaces from the Hargreaves equation at watershed scale , 2011 .

[25]  Antonio Moñino,et al.  WiMMed, a distributed physically-based watershed model (I): Description and validation , 2009 .

[26]  A. Millares,et al.  On the influence of cell size in physically-based distributed hydrological modelling to assess extreme values in water resource planning , 2012 .

[27]  N. Eriyagama,et al.  Developing a software package for global desktop assessment of environmental flows , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[28]  Javier Herrero,et al.  Topographic effects on solar radiation distribution in mountainous watersheds and their influence on reference evapotranspiration estimates at watershed scale. , 2010 .

[29]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  Assessment of environmental flows under limited data availability: case study of the Acheloos River, Greece , 2014 .

[30]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[31]  M. Losada,et al.  Meteomap: Generation Of Meteorological Variables For Distributed Physically-Based Hydrological Modeling , 2014 .

[32]  J. Alcázar,et al.  Establishing environmental flow regimes in a Mediterranean watershed based on a regional classification , 2010 .

[33]  A. Solera,et al.  IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS IN COMPLEX WATER RESOURCES SYSTEMS – CASE STUDY: THE DUERO RIVER BASIN, SPAIN , 2013 .

[34]  Robert T. Milhous,et al.  Physical habitat simulation system reference manual: version II , 1989 .

[35]  Ming-Hsi Hsu,et al.  Water quality modeling to determine minimum instream flow for fish survival in tidal rivers. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  H. Fill,et al.  Estimating Instantaneous Peak Flow from Mean Daily Flow Data , 2003 .

[37]  J. Alcázar,et al.  A neural net model for environmental flow estimation at the Ebro River Basin, Spain , 2008 .

[38]  Mike Acreman,et al.  Linking science and decision-making: features and experience from environmental river flow setting , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[39]  D. Hughes Hydrological issues associated with the determination of environmental water requirements of ephemeral rivers , 2005 .

[40]  Basin influence on natural variability of rivers in semi‐arid environments , 2005 .

[41]  Hervé Capra,et al.  A new tool to interpret magnitude and duration of fish habitat variations , 1995 .

[42]  Brian Richter,et al.  Application of the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration Software in Environmental Flow Setting 1 , 2007 .

[43]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[44]  Lei Cheng,et al.  The effect of spatial rainfall variability on water balance modelling for south-eastern Australian catchments ☆ , 2013 .

[45]  M. Acreman,et al.  Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive. , 2010 .

[46]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[47]  J. Alcázar,et al.  The basic flow method for incorporating flow variability in environmental flows , 2012 .

[48]  Brian Richter,et al.  A PRESUMPTIVE STANDARD FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW PROTECTION , 2012 .