Parameter estimation of perfusion models in dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging: a unified framework for model comparison

&NA; Patients follow‐up in oncology is generally performed through the acquisition of dynamic sequences of contrast‐enhanced images. Estimating parameters of appropriate models of contrast intake diffusion through tissues should help characterizing the tumour physiology. However, several models have been developed and no consensus exists on their clinical use. In this paper, we propose a unified framework to analyse models of perfusion and estimate their parameters in order to obtain reliable and relevant parametric images. After defining the biological context and the general form of perfusion models, we propose a methodological framework for model assessment in the context of parameter estimation from dynamic imaging data: global sensitivity analysis, structural and practical identifiability analysis, parameter estimation and model comparison. Then, we apply our methodology to five of the most widely used compartment models (Tofts model, extended Tofts model, two‐compartment model, tissue‐homogeneity model and distributed‐parameters model) and illustrate the results by analysing the behaviour of these models when applied to data acquired on five patients with abdominal tumours. HighlightsWe propose a mathematical framework to analyse models of perfusion.We estimate parameters from dynamic imaging data.We compare the most widely used compartment models of perfusion.We apply our methodology to data acquired on patients with abdominal tumours. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available.

[1]  Ursula Klingmüller,et al.  Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood , 2009, Bioinform..

[2]  C. Nasel,et al.  A standardized method of generating time-to-peak perfusion maps in dynamic-susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  Michael Ingrisch,et al.  Tracer-kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT: a primer , 2013, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[4]  Laurent D. Cohen,et al.  Registration of Free-Breathing 3D+t Abdominal Perfusion CT Images via Co-segmentation , 2013, MICCAI.

[5]  A. Jackson,et al.  Experimentally‐derived functional form for a population‐averaged high‐temporal‐resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  A. Padhani,et al.  Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[7]  D. Sahani,et al.  Assessing tumor perfusion and treatment response in rectal cancer with multisection CT: initial observations. , 2005, Radiology.

[8]  Xiangyu Yang,et al.  Improving the pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI by use of the arterial input function: Theory and clinical application , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  D L Buckley,et al.  Tracer kinetic modelling in MRI: estimating perfusion and capillary permeability , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Y. Ohno,et al.  CT hepatic perfusion measurement: comparison of three analytic methods. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[11]  K. Zierler,et al.  On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. , 1954, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  G. Brix,et al.  Tracer kinetic modelling of tumour angiogenesis based on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MRI measurements , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[14]  H. Künsch,et al.  Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models , 2001 .

[15]  A. Jackson,et al.  Modeling of contrast agent kinetics in the lung using T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  A. Roche,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US): a new tool for the early evaluation of antiangiogenic treatment , 2010, Targeted Oncology.

[17]  N. Holalkere,et al.  Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: CT perfusion of liver and tumor tissue--initial experience. , 2007, Radiology.

[18]  Susanne Keiding,et al.  Bringing Physiology into PET of the Liver , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  W. Sangren,et al.  A mathematical derivation of the exchange of a labeled substance between a liquid flowing in a vessel and an external compartment , 1953 .

[20]  C. Thng,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: feasibility of a prolonged dual-phase imaging protocol with tracer kinetics modeling , 2009, European Radiology.

[21]  Maksat Ashyraliyev,et al.  Systems biology: parameter estimation for biochemical models , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[22]  Frédérique Frouin,et al.  Comprehensive model for simultaneous MRI determination of perfusion and permeability using a blood-pool agent in rats rhabdomyosarcoma , 2005, European Radiology.

[23]  QiongLi Wu,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Functional Structural Plant Modelling , 2012 .

[24]  M. Bahner,et al.  Regional blood flow, capillary permeability, and compartmental volumes: measurement with dynamic CT--initial experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[25]  D. Buckley,et al.  Perfusion estimated with rapid dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging correlates inversely with vascular endothelial growth factor expression and pimonidazole staining in head-and-neck cancer: a pilot study. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  James W. T. Yates,et al.  Structural Identifiability of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models , 2006, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[27]  C. Thng,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of head and neck tumors: perfusion measurements using a distributed-parameter tracer kinetic model. Initial results and comparison with deconvolution-based analysis , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  G. Brix,et al.  Simulation-based comparison of two approaches frequently used for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI , 2010, European Radiology.

[29]  M. P. Hayball,et al.  Current status and guidelines for the assessment of tumour vascular support with dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography , 2012, European Radiology.

[30]  C. Thng,et al.  Hepatic metastases: in vivo assessment of perfusion parameters at dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with dual-input two-compartment tracer kinetics model. , 2008, Radiology.

[31]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  S. Prasad,et al.  Tumor Response Evaluation in Oncology: Current Update , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[33]  D. Sahani,et al.  Body perfusion CT: technique, clinical applications, and advances. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[34]  A. Padhani,et al.  Tumor response assessments with diffusion and perfusion MRI , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  S. Sourbron Technical aspects of MR perfusion. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[36]  M. Morales,et al.  On the theory of blood-tissue exchange of inert gases; validity of approximate uptake expressions. , 1948, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[37]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[38]  S. Delorme,et al.  On impulse response functions computed from dynamic contrast-enhanced image data by algebraic deconvolution and compartmental modeling. , 2012, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[39]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[40]  I. Sobol Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[41]  G. Brix,et al.  Pharmacokinetic analysis of tissue microcirculation using nested models: multimodel inference and parameter identifiability. , 2009, Medical physics.

[42]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  Inverse Modelling, Sensitivity and Monte Carlo Analysis in R Using Package FME , 2010 .

[43]  Anders Forsgren,et al.  Interior Methods for Nonlinear Optimization , 2002, SIAM Rev..

[44]  Florence d'Alché-Buc,et al.  A Multi-task Learning Approach for Compartmental Model Parameter Estimation in DCE-CT Sequences , 2013, MICCAI.

[45]  C. Thng,et al.  Fundamentals of tracer kinetics for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[46]  J. Banga,et al.  Structural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods , 2011, PloS one.

[47]  K. B. Larson,et al.  Tracer-Kinetic Models for Measuring Cerebral Blood Flow Using Externally Detected Radiotracers , 1987, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[48]  David Atkinson,et al.  Bayesian estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters for DCE-MRI with a robust treatment of enhancement onset time. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[49]  O. Lucidarme,et al.  Optimisation of reconstruction for the registration of CT liver perfusion sequences , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[50]  Mikael Karlsson,et al.  A Novel Estimation Method for Physiological Parameters in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Application of a Distributed Parameter Model Using Fourier-Domain Calculations , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[51]  Jianji Pan,et al.  Quantitative study of lung perfusion SPECT scanning and pulmonary function testing for early radiation-induced lung injury in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. , 2012, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[52]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[53]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Quantitative tumor perfusion assessment with multidetector CT: are measurements from two commercial software packages interchangeable? , 2007, Radiology.

[54]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain: I. Theoretical Derivation , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.