Defining requirements for an Augmented Reality system to overcome the challenges of creating and using design representations in co-design sessions

ABSTRACT Within co-design sessions involving designers and non-designers, the type and characteristics of the design representations employed is known to impact the performance of such sessions in terms of idea generation, idea evaluation and communication. This study captures the challenges practitioners face in creating and using design representations for co-design sessions and goes on to investigate the potential of Spatial Augmented Reality (SAR) to overcome those challenges. The advantages of SAR in this application are that, multiple concepts can be represented using one physical model, concepts can be modified live during the session, and additional equipment (such as head mounted displays or handheld devices) is not required, thus eliminating any possible interference with the natural interactions between participants. Interviews with design practitioners and trials with a prototype SAR system are used to identify the key challenges faced by practitioners in their current use of design representations, and to capture the technology requirements for a SAR system for use in co-design sessions. These findings can inform the work of technology developers and researchers working on systems to support co-design sessions.

[1]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[2]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[3]  Jeff Rose,et al.  Rotating virtual objects with real handles , 1999, TCHI.

[4]  Christian Heath,et al.  Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction , 2000 .

[5]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Communication Behaviors in Colocated Collaborative AR Interfaces , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  Mikael Söderman Virtual reality in product evaluations with potential customers: An exploratory study comparing virtual reality with conventional product representations , 2005 .

[7]  Remko van der Lugt,et al.  How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings , 2005 .

[8]  Youn-Kyung Lim,et al.  Comparative analysis of high- and low-fidelity prototypes for more valid usability evaluations of mobile devices , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[9]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Rapid construction of functioning physical interfaces from cardboard, thumbtacks, tin foil and masking tape , 2006, UIST.

[10]  Fraser J. M. Reid,et al.  Conversational grounding and visual access in collaborative design , 2007 .

[11]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas , 2008, TCHI.

[12]  Eujin Pei,et al.  Building a common language of design representations for industrial designers and engineering designers , 2009 .

[13]  David Radcliffe,et al.  Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[14]  Rafael Radkowski,et al.  Applicability of Image-based Lighting for an Augmented Reality-based Design Review , 2009 .

[15]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  DisplayObjects: prototyping functional physical interfaces on 3d styrofoam, paper or cardboard models , 2010, TEI '10.

[16]  Ross T. Smith,et al.  Validating Spatial Augmented Reality for interactive rapid prototyping , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[17]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Design Fixation in Physical Modeling: An Investigation on the Role of Sunk Cost , 2011 .

[18]  Jacques Terken,et al.  THE USE OF DESIGN REPRESENTATIONS FOR DESIGN COMMUNICATION: INSIGHTS FROM PRACTICE , 2012 .

[19]  Bjarki Hallgrimsson,et al.  Prototyping and Modelmaking for Product Design , 2012 .

[20]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  A user study of interpretability of engineering design representations , 2012 .

[21]  Fabio Bruno,et al.  Mixed prototyping with configurable physical archetype for usability evaluation of product interfaces , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[22]  Hyungjun Park,et al.  Design evaluation of information appliances using augmented reality-based tangible interaction , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[23]  Reinhard Koch,et al.  Truthful Color Reproduction in Spatial Augmented Reality Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[24]  Andrew Irlitti,et al.  Validating Constraint Driven Design Techniques in Spatial Augmented Reality , 2013, AUIC.

[25]  Jouke Verlinden Developing an Interactive Augmented Prototyping Methodology to Support Design Reviews , 2014 .

[26]  Nathaniel Crilly,et al.  Fixation and creativity in concept development: the attitudes and practices of expert designers , 2015 .

[27]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Connections Between the Design Tool, Design Attributes, and User Preferences in Early Stage Design , 2015 .

[28]  Kwan H. Lee,et al.  Spatial augmented reality for product appearance design evaluation , 2015, J. Comput. Des. Eng..

[29]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  The effects of representation on idea generation and design fixation: A study comparing sketches and function trees , 2016 .

[30]  Mark Sage Creating Augmented Reality Experiences for Enterprise: Good practices, lessons learned, and technological insights , 2017, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine.

[31]  Vimal Dhokia,et al.  ANALYSIS OF CO-DESIGN SCENARIOS AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SPATIAL-AUGMENTED REALITY DESIGN PLATFORM , 2018 .