Clinical use of the Oncotype DX genomic test to guide treatment decisions for patients with invasive breast cancer

Implementation of the Oncotype DX assay has led to a change in the manner in which chemotherapy is utilized in patients with early stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, node-negative breast cancer; ensuring that patients at highest risk of recurrence are prescribed systemic treatment, while at the same time sparing low-risk patients potential adverse events from therapy unlikely to influence their survival. This test generates a recurrence score between 0 and 100, which correlates with probability of distant disease recurrence. Patients with low-risk recurrence scores (0–17) are unlikely to derive significant survival benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal agents derived from using adjuvant hormonal therapy only. Conversely, adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to significantly improve survival in patients with high-risk recurrence scores (≥31). Trials are ongoing to determine how best to manage patients with recurrence scores in the intermediate range. This review outlines the introduction and impact of Oncotype DX testing on practice; ongoing clinical trials investigating its utility; and challenging clinical scenarios where the absolute recurrence score may require careful interpretation. We also performed a bibliometric analysis of publications on the topics of breast cancer and Oncotype DX as a surrogate marker of acceptability and incorporation of the assay into the management of patients with breast cancer.

[1]  W. Valentine,et al.  Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK. , 2017, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[2]  C. Hudis,et al.  Breast carcinoma with an Oncotype Dx recurrence score <18: Rate of distant metastases in a large series with clinical follow‐up , 2017, Cancer.

[3]  ONCOLOGISTS’ BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS FOR ONCOTYPE DX USE: QUALITATIVE STUDY , 2016, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  R. Rouzier,et al.  Pooled analysis of prospective European studies assessing the impact of using the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay on clinical decision making in women with oestrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early-stage breast cancer. , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[5]  A. Amini,et al.  21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay As a Predictor of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Administration for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Analysis of Use, Therapeutic Implications, and Disparity Profile. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  E. Friedman,et al.  Oncotype-DX recurrence score distribution in breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  David C. Jones,et al.  Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole genome sequences , 2016, Nature.

[8]  C. Hudis,et al.  Twenty‐one–gene recurrence score assay in BRCA‐associated versus sporadic breast cancers: Differences based on germline mutation status , 2016, Cancer.

[9]  C. Gross,et al.  Influence of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Chemotherapy Delivery in Breast Cancer. , 2016, Clinical breast cancer.

[10]  T. King,et al.  Oncotype DX in Bilateral Synchronous Primary Invasive Breast Cancer , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  Virginia G Kaklamani,et al.  Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  C. Quinn,et al.  Economic impact of 21-gene recurrence score testing on early-stage breast cancer in Ireland , 2015, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  B. Hirsch,et al.  Initial Trends in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Patients With Breast Cancer in the Medicare Population, 2005-2009. , 2015, JAMA oncology.

[14]  L. Steuten,et al.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX® versus current clinical practice from a Dutch cost perspective. , 2015, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[15]  Y. Bombard,et al.  The value of personalizing medicine: medical oncologists' views on gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment. , 2015, The oncologist.

[16]  C. Villarreal-Garza,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of the 21-Gene Breast Cancer Assay in Mexico , 2015, Advances in Therapy.

[17]  C. Perou,et al.  Chemotherapy benefit for 'ER-positive' breast cancer and contamination of nonluminal subtypes—waiting for TAILORx and RxPONDER. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  E. Rutgers,et al.  Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  Nicola Miller,et al.  The impact of Oncotype DX testing on breast cancer management and chemotherapy prescribing patterns in a tertiary referral centre , 2014, European journal of cancer.

[20]  K. Hunt,et al.  Tumor Biology Correlates With Rates of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Findings From the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial , 2014, Annals of surgery.

[21]  A. Brufsky Predictive and Prognostic Value of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Hormone Receptor–positive, Node-positive Breast Cancer , 2014, American journal of clinical oncology.

[22]  D. Lorenzetti,et al.  Experiences and attitudes toward risk of recurrence testing in women with breast cancer: a systematic review , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[23]  M. Kerin,et al.  Assessing the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the management of the breast and axilla in breast cancer. , 2014, Clinical breast cancer.

[24]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[25]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Factors Predicting Late Recurrence for Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[27]  George W. Sledge,et al.  A Multigene Expression Assay to Predict Local Recurrence Risk for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  O. Olopade,et al.  Should all BRCA1 mutation carriers with stage I breast cancer receive chemotherapy? , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[29]  W. Foulkes Size surprise? Tumour size, nodal status, and outcome after breast cancer. , 2012, Current oncology.

[30]  T. Julian,et al.  Prognostic impact of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) on disease-free and overall survival of node-positive, ER-positive breast cancer patients (pts) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: Results from NSABP B-28. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  W. Gradishar,et al.  Barriers to the use of personalized medicine in breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of oncology practice.

[32]  D. Cutter,et al.  Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100 000 women in 123 randomised trials , 2012, The Lancet.

[33]  Christopher McCabe,et al.  Economic evaluation of genomic test-directed chemotherapy for early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[34]  Funda Meric-Bernstam,et al.  Response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers: a single-institution experience. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  R. Gelber,et al.  Strategies for subtypes—dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011 , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[36]  Joseph P. Costantino,et al.  Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20 , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[37]  Päivi Heikkilä,et al.  Subtyping of Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry to Investigate a Relationship between Subtype and Short and Long Term Survival: A Collaborative Analysis of Data for 10,159 Cases from 12 Studies , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[38]  L. Carey,et al.  Women's experiences with genomic testing for breast cancer recurrence risk , 2010, Cancer.

[39]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  D. Hayes,et al.  Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  S. Martino,et al.  Adjuvant chemotherapy and timing of tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[42]  Robert B Livingston,et al.  Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[43]  A. Di Leo,et al.  Recent advances in systemic therapy. New diagnostics and biological predictors of outcome in early breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.

[44]  S. Shak,et al.  Quantitative gene expression analysis using Oncotype DX in ductal carcinomain situthat is adjacent to invasive ductal carcinoma. , 2009 .

[45]  S. Swain,et al.  The influence of a Gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions , 2008, Journal of surgical oncology.

[46]  P. Tartter,et al.  Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer? , 2008, American journal of surgery.

[47]  Robert Gray,et al.  Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  S. Paik,et al.  Development of the 21-gene assay and its application in clinical practice and clinical trials. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[49]  Sarah E Lillie,et al.  Women's interest in gene expression analysis for breast cancer recurrence risk. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[50]  M. Cronin,et al.  Analytical validation of the Oncotype DX genomic diagnostic test for recurrence prognosis and therapeutic response prediction in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 2007, Clinical chemistry.

[51]  J. Sparano,et al.  TAILORx: trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx). , 2006, Clinical breast cancer.

[52]  D. Berry,et al.  Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer. , 2006, JAMA.

[53]  M. Cronin,et al.  Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  S. Shak,et al.  A population-based study of tumor gene expression and risk of breast cancer death among lymph node-negative patients , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.

[55]  B. Fisher,et al.  National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project , 2020, Definitions.

[56]  I. Ellis,et al.  The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[57]  M. Cronin,et al.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[58]  J. Bryant,et al.  Treatment of lymph-node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: long-term findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomised clinical trials , 2004, The Lancet.

[59]  L. Bégin,et al.  Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[60]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[61]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  R. Simon,et al.  The relation between estrogen receptors and response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.