Gender and the Automobile

With a focus on individual motorists in car-owning households in Germany, this analysis econometrically investigates the determinants of automobile travel for nonwork service activities against the backdrop of two questions: (a) Does gender play a role in determining the probability of car use and the distance driven? and (b) If so, how is this role mitigated or exacerbated by other socioeconomic attributes of the individual and the household in which he or she resides? Drawing on a panel of data collected between 1996 and 2003, Heckman's sample selection model is specified to control for biases that otherwise could arise from the existence of unobservable variables that determine both the discrete and the continuous choices pertaining to car use. The results indicate that although women, on average, undertake more nonwork travel than men, they undertake less such travel by car, implying a greater reliance on other modes. Moreover, employment status, age, the number of children, automobile availability, and the proximity to public transit are all found to have significantly different effects on the probability of nonwork car travel between men and women but—with the exception of automobile availability—not on the distance driven. Taken together, these results suggest that policies targeted at reducing automobile dependency and associated negative externalities, such as congestion, are unlikely to have uniform effects across the sexes. These findings have implications for both policy evaluation and travel demand forecasting.

[1]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[2]  S. Sarmiento,et al.  HOUSEHOLD, GENDER, AND TRAVEL , 2000 .

[3]  Y. Bussière,et al.  HOUSEHOLD STRUCTURE AND MOBILITY PATTERNS OF WOMEN IN O-D SURVEYS: METHODS AND RESULTS BASED ON THE CASE STUDIES OF MONTREAL AND PARIS , 2000 .

[4]  Wilko Manz,et al.  Infrastructure Development in Germany Under Stagnating Demand Conditions: A New Paradigm? , 2004 .

[5]  Maria Limbourg Mobilität im Alter: Probleme und Perspektiven , 1999 .

[6]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .

[7]  Langche Zeng,et al.  Analyzing Censored and Sample-Selected Data with Tobit and Heckit Models , 1999, Political Analysis.

[8]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[9]  G. Maddala Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[10]  S. Rosenbloom TRENDS IN WOMEN'S TRAVEL PATTERNS , 2000 .

[11]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Deriving conditional and unconditional marginal effects in log earnings equations estimated by Heckman's procedure , 2005 .

[12]  Elmar Brockfeld,et al.  On the Role of Gender as a Determinant of Car Use: Evidence from Germany , 2005 .

[13]  J. Dargay,et al.  Volatility of car ownership, commutingmode and time in the UK , 2007 .

[14]  P. Pécheur,et al.  JOURNEY TO WORK , 1982 .

[15]  P. Gordon,et al.  Gender Differences in Metropolitan Travel Behaviour , 1989 .

[16]  W. Greene Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: Comment , 1981 .

[17]  S. Hanson,et al.  GENDER DIFFERENCES IN WORK-TRIP LENGTH: EXPLANATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS , 1985 .

[18]  Perry O. Hanson,et al.  Gender and Urban Activity Patterns in Uppsala, Sweden , 1980 .